Posted on 08/30/2009 10:06:54 AM PDT by RobinMasters
The Times of London continues to rip to shreds the official explanations from Edinburgh and London over the so-called compassionate release of Abdel Baset Ali al-Megrahi, the terrorist who killed 270 people, mostly Americans, in the 1987 bombing of Pan Am flight 103. The Scots insisted that the release was consistent with their values, while the Gordon Brown government insisted that they did nothing to influence the decision. New documents unearthed by the Times show both to be lying:
The British government decided it was in the overwhelming interests of the United Kingdom to make Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, the Lockerbie bomber, eligible for return to Libya, leaked ministerial letters reveal.
Gordon Browns government made the decision after discussions between Libya and BP over a multi-million-pound oil exploration deal had hit difficulties. These were resolved soon afterwards.
The letters were sent two years ago by Jack Straw, the justice secretary, to Kenny MacAskill, his counterpart in Scotland, who has been widely criticised for taking the formal decision to permit Megrahis release.
The correspondence makes it plain that the key decision to include Megrahi in a deal with Libya to allow prisoners to return home was, in fact, taken in London for British national interests.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
This could bring down 2 governments.
Is there anyone that believes that our government didn’t know about this? Which Czar was involved?
I dont think the guy even had cancer.
You are probably right on this one. This was done for OIL.
America truly stands alone, France sold us out for Saddam’s oil, now the UK sells us out for Libyan oil.
We sold ourselves out at the outset of the Iraq Warr when Ghaddafi bought his way back into the fold with cooperation. The Bush admin forgave him and western interests jumped at the chance to do business with Libya. You can bet that this deal will fill US petroleum coffers.
Bet Obama knew about it and was right up there agreeing with it.
This deal was vetted with the U.S. before it happened. Just like the Korean journalist deal was vetted before Clinton flew over.
That is true. I never liked letting Libya off the hook. It flew in the face of everything that stood for “The War on Terror”.
And judging by the hero’s reception the bomber got back in Libya, the tiger hasn’t changed their stripes.
Perfidious Albion. I’m interested in seeing what the Brit posters say about this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.