Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presidential Authority to Shut Down the Internet?
Common Sense 2020 ^ | 2009-08-28C | LukeAmerica2020

Posted on 08/29/2009 3:49:42 AM PDT by Phree Non-Phixion

A Senate bill, S-773, would offer President Obama emergency control of the Internet and may give him authority to shut down online traffic by seizing private networks.

Details of a revised version of the CyberSecurity Act of 2009 emerged late Thursday (August 27th), months after an initial version authored by Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV). The original version was highly criticized in Silicon Valley as a dangerous government intrusion.

The new version of the CyberSecurity Act of 2009 changes the wording to allow the President to “declare a cyber-security emergency” relating to “non-governmental” computer networks. As with the original bill, however, the revised bill does not explain what a cyber-security emergency is.

(this article includes more details and links to the bill)

Presidential Authority to Shut Down the Internet?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cybersecurity; internet; obama; s773
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 08/29/2009 3:49:42 AM PDT by Phree Non-Phixion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Phree Non-Phixion

I see that Rockefeller, America’s Uriah Heep, is at it again. He must be tired of screwing-up our intelligence gathering capability and leaking top secrets to the New York Times. The man is dangerous, very dangerous.


2 posted on 08/29/2009 4:41:28 AM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phree Non-Phixion

I know we have folks on Free Republic in West Virginia and I think it is a beautiful state.......BUT.......any State that has Jay Rockefeller and R Byrd as it’s Senators should be ashamed of themselves.

They steal money from everyone else in the country and pay off all the whores that keep them in office.


3 posted on 08/29/2009 4:42:26 AM PDT by Recon Dad ( MARSOC DAD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phree Non-Phixion
WOH
Got my attention! ! ! ! !
4 posted on 08/29/2009 4:48:34 AM PDT by DeaconRed (Drop Kick me Jesus through the Goal Post of Life.. . . . .But keep me in the MOB-& send -0- packing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

agree


5 posted on 08/29/2009 4:49:17 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

Well ... R. Byrd probably won’t be around the Senate for much longer ...


6 posted on 08/29/2009 4:51:55 AM PDT by Phree Non-Phixion (Humor in Perilous Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phree Non-Phixion
R. Byrd probably won’t be around the Senate for much longer ...

Yeah, well, that was said about Teddy the K.

.

.

In 1969.

7 posted on 08/29/2009 4:57:43 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Phree Non-Phixion

Well ... R. Byrd probably won’t be around the Senate for much longer ...

The light at the end of the tunnel.


8 posted on 08/29/2009 4:57:43 AM PDT by Recon Dad ( MARSOC DAD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Melchior

Why anybody would vote for a Rockefeller, Kennedy, Bush, ect is beyond me. Don’t vote for an oligarch (or the offspring of one) and expect anything but a loss of liberty for the common man.


9 posted on 08/29/2009 5:03:28 AM PDT by RAO1125 (Neoconservatism:Failed. Socialism:Failing (again). Next up: Libertarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Phree Non-Phixion
Amendment III

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

The security I put on my computer network is not unlike the lock I put on my front door. I don't give the government a key to my house and I don't want to give them a key to my computer network.

The only time it should be permitted for the government to even consider messing with my computer is when a formal declaration of war has been passed. Even with a such a declaration, it doesn't mean they kick me out of my own computer network and off the internet.

The value of property rights has been decreasing.

10 posted on 08/29/2009 5:04:06 AM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537

Once they get firm control of the Internet and the broadcast media, they will have gone a long way to silencing the opposition. They are working on both plans as we speak. Folks, our liberties are severely threatened.


11 posted on 08/29/2009 5:08:09 AM PDT by bytesmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Phree Non-Phixion

Belated welcome to FR.


12 posted on 08/29/2009 5:16:28 AM PDT by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bytesmith

Indeed. It’s not about cyber-security; it’s about controlling information to/for/from we, the people.

If they ‘own’ the Internet and Mark Lloyd, the new FCC Diversity Czar, closes talk radio ... we will lose two vital tools of communication.


13 posted on 08/29/2009 5:17:14 AM PDT by Phree Non-Phixion (Humor in Perilous Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung

“The value of property rights has been decreasing.”

and will become illegal eventually.


14 posted on 08/29/2009 5:18:54 AM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Phree Non-Phixion

we will be stuck with the US mail, shortwave - if you have a transmitter and can find a freq that isn’t jammed the moment you come up and can survive the result of your signal being tracked, located, and destroyed in a few minutes.

Then there is always that old stand by - horse back...


15 posted on 08/29/2009 5:21:59 AM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RAO1125

Give me a break! As much as you obviously dislike President Bush, he would NEVER have proposed this or anything like what the Obama administration is doing.


16 posted on 08/29/2009 5:23:51 AM PDT by srmorton (Choose life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Phree Non-Phixion

Contact your Congress critters on this one!


17 posted on 08/29/2009 5:38:19 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

Oly Snowe has her fingerprints on this too.


18 posted on 08/29/2009 5:44:28 AM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Better make this yet another theme of the Tea Party. They are basically proposing a modern Stamp Act. Also, get secession movements in gear in case Washington is unsalvageable.


19 posted on 08/29/2009 5:44:41 AM PDT by coydog (Time to feed the pigs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Our government is more corrupt and power-grabbing now than I ever remember.


20 posted on 08/29/2009 5:57:23 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson