Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sun's Cycle Alters Earth's Climate
Space.com ^ | 27 August 2009 | SPACE.com Staff

Posted on 08/28/2009 9:45:03 AM PDT by tricky_k_1972

Sun's Cycle Alters Earth's Climate
By SPACE.com Staff

posted: 27 August 2009
02:08 pm ET

Weather patterns across the globe are partly affected by connections between the 11-year solar cycle of activity, Earth's stratosphere and the tropical Pacific Ocean, a new study finds.

The study could help scientists get an edge on eventually predicting the intensity of certain climate phenomena, such as the Indian monsoon and tropical Pacific rainfall, years in advance.

The sun is the ultimate source of all the energy on Earth; its rays heat the planet and drive the churning motions of its atmosphere.

The amount of energy the sun puts out varies over an 11-year cycle (this cycle also governs the appearance of sunspots on the sun's surface as well as radiation storms that can knock out satellites), but that cycle changes the total amount of energy reaching Earth by only about 0.1 percent. A conundrum for meteorologists was explaining whether and how such a small variation could drive major changes in weather patterns on Earth.

Earth-space connection

An international team of scientists led by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) used more than a century of weather observations and three powerful computer models to tackle this question.

The answer, the new study finds, has to do with the Sun's impact on two seemingly unrelated regions: water in the tropical Pacific Ocean and air in the stratosphere, the layer of the atmosphere that runs from around 6 miles (10 km) above Earth's surface to about 31 miles (50 km).

The study found that chemicals in the stratosphere and sea surface temperatures in the Pacific Ocean respond during solar maximum in a way that amplifies the sun's influence on some aspects of air movement. This can intensify winds and rainfall, change sea surface temperatures and cloud cover over certain tropical and subtropical regions, and ultimately influence global weather.

"The sun, the stratosphere, and the oceans are connected in ways that can influence events such as winter rainfall in North America," said lead author of the study, Gerald Meehl of NCAR. "Understanding the role of the solar cycle can provide added insight as scientists work toward predicting regional weather patterns for the next couple of decades."

The findings are detailed in the Aug. 28 issue of the journal Science.

How it happens

The changes occur like this: The slight increase in solar energy during the peak production of sunspots is absorbed by stratospheric ozone, warming the air in the stratosphere over the tropics, where sunlight is most intense. The additional energy also stimulates the production of additional ozone there that absorbs even more solar energy.

Since the stratosphere warms unevenly, with the most pronounced warming occurring nearer the equator, stratospheric winds are altered and, through a chain of interconnected processes, end up strengthening tropical precipitation.

At the same time, the increased sunlight at solar maximum — a peak of sunspot and solar storm activity we're currently headed toward — causes a slight warming of ocean surface waters across the subtropical Pacific, where sun-blocking clouds are normally scarce. That small amount of extra heat leads to more evaporation, putting additional water vapor into the atmosphere. The moisture is carried by trade winds to the normally rainy areas of the western tropical Pacific, fueling heavier rains and reinforcing the effects of the stratospheric mechanism.

These two processes reinforce each other and intensify the effect.

These stratospheric and ocean responses during solar maximum keep the equatorial eastern Pacific even cooler and drier than usual, producing conditions similar to a La Nina event. However, the cooling of about 1-2 degrees Fahrenheit is focused farther east than in a typical La Nina (the opposite sister effect of the warm-water El Nino), is only about half as strong, and is associated with different wind patterns in the stratosphere.

The solar cycle does not have as great an effect on Earth's climate as the El Nino cycle.

But the Indian monsoon, Pacific sea surface temperatures and precipitation, and other regional climate patterns are largely driven by rising and sinking air in Earth's tropics and subtropics. The new study could help scientists use solar-cycle predictions to estimate how that circulation, and the regional climate patterns related to it, might vary over the next decade or two.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: capandtax; catastrophism; solaractivity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: ForGod'sSake
I don't think anyone is ignoring the solar wind/ cosmic ray processes. As I posted HERE,

"With this mechanism, the cosmic ray mechanism, and the negative feedback cloud mechanism proposed by Dr.Spencer (essentially meaning the climate models are confusing cause and effect), there are now three strong hypotheses to enhance the direct effect of solar radiation. None of these are included in current GCMs, and have the effect of invalidating all predictions previously made by these models."

41 posted on 08/31/2009 9:52:44 AM PDT by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
I don't think anyone is ignoring the solar wind/ cosmic ray processes.

Understood, and that's a good post I had noticed earlier you linked to. It seems more plausible as a factor than a, what, .01% change in the sun's temperature. Now, it's possible the authors of this article may have alluded to the effect of "solar storms" couched in terms such as increased "solar activity" or "solar energy", but it appears their theory only addressed the miniscule temperature change as the primary mover.

Just curious, is the other theory you linked to VERY new?

42 posted on 08/31/2009 6:06:42 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have two choices and two choices only: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: tricky_k_1972

btt


43 posted on 08/31/2009 6:11:11 PM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Cosmic Ray was first proposed about 30 years ago, but mechanism was really only solidified about 10 years ago. Svensmark is the leading proponent now, and is leading the CLOUD09 project at CERN. It was critiqued as “doesn’t agree with data” but that is increasingly being shown untrue. There is a “delay” of 7-30 days after cosmic ray initiates the nucleation which is only now being realized which made the correlation with data difficult to see. Svensmark et al recently showed that to be true, though. The CLOUD09 experiment will go a very long way toward advancing it.

Roy Spencer’s hypothesis published in last 2-3 years. He is pretty much out in front on that one. It is a very strong positive feedback for solar irradiance. I would not be surprised if his proposal fits in to reinforce the process proposed in this article, but that will be up to him and these researchers to hash out.

The process mentioned in this article, stratophere/ocean combo, is brand new.

Bottom line, though, is that the “no way for solar irradiance to be amplified that we know of” the fool climate models insist on up to now is clearly inaccurate. That means that in the future, the GCMs are going to have to pay much more attention to these “inadequate” changes in the Sun to remain credible. (This finally vindicates Lassen and others who consistently maintain the strong correlation of Earth’s temperature with sunspots/ solar cycles for decades and even centuries demonstrates a stronger than “understood” influence of the Sun.)


44 posted on 08/31/2009 8:34:20 PM PDT by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: tricky_k_1972

Whoda thunk that big yellow thing up there would affect the weather? Seriously?

Sheesh.


45 posted on 08/31/2009 8:36:51 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (You're either in or in the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Thanks for your insights. I suppose what I can gather from all this is that a career herding cats might be less frustrating than trying to figure out what drives the earth’s climate? And speaking of cat herders, how much of this fur ball can be attributed to the PC and AGW crowd?


46 posted on 08/31/2009 10:06:40 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have two choices and two choices only: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson