Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ForGod'sSake
I don't think anyone is ignoring the solar wind/ cosmic ray processes. As I posted HERE,

"With this mechanism, the cosmic ray mechanism, and the negative feedback cloud mechanism proposed by Dr.Spencer (essentially meaning the climate models are confusing cause and effect), there are now three strong hypotheses to enhance the direct effect of solar radiation. None of these are included in current GCMs, and have the effect of invalidating all predictions previously made by these models."

41 posted on 08/31/2009 9:52:44 AM PDT by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: AFPhys
I don't think anyone is ignoring the solar wind/ cosmic ray processes.

Understood, and that's a good post I had noticed earlier you linked to. It seems more plausible as a factor than a, what, .01% change in the sun's temperature. Now, it's possible the authors of this article may have alluded to the effect of "solar storms" couched in terms such as increased "solar activity" or "solar energy", but it appears their theory only addressed the miniscule temperature change as the primary mover.

Just curious, is the other theory you linked to VERY new?

42 posted on 08/31/2009 6:06:42 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have two choices and two choices only: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson