Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Awesome new(old) engine tech...TURBO COMPOUNDING
Layover.com ^ | 2009-02-24 | ?

Posted on 08/23/2009 7:08:39 PM PDT by mamelukesabre

ARLINGTON, Va. —The Truck Writers of North America (TWNA) announced Detroit Diesel Corporation’s DD15 engine turbo compounding as the winner of its Technical Achievement Award for 2008 during TMC’s 2009 Annual Meeting in Orlando, Fla., Feb. 9-12.

(Excerpt) Read more at layover.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: diesel; efficiency; engine; turbo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: truth_seeker

They won’t, they don’t want to increase the supply of diesel in the country.

This goes against the strategy of “Energy Denial” that the libs are executing.

Even though it would be more efficient, they will oppose it because it defeats a bigger goal of destroying the average persons’ energy freedom. If you can get better mileage and diesel’s cost stays the same, you will drive more and this is not good. If they make more diesel so you can all drive more diesel cars and thus be freer, and even though pollution will be down because it’s cleaner now, they don’t want us to have all this energy we can use.

They believe we are using too much, and so they oppose cleaner technology because that allows us to use more without harming the environment (control is important, not the environment); they oppose new exploration and development of US sources of oil and coal and gas (because control is important, not energy independence OR energy abundance); and they oppose the cleanest and newest designs in nuclear (because control is important, not the environment, cheap energy, or clean energy).

They are in the process of taking us down as a superpower. They are forcing us to remain dependent on foreign energy, wasting our money on windmills, they are tanking the currency that will ultimately lead to hyperinflation by printing so much of it but there’s nothing backing it.

We have to get the country back fast or it’s all over and global government and national sovereignty are gone. These people are traitors and need to be exposed as such. This isn’t just incompetence, it’s deliberate destruction and takeover.


21 posted on 08/23/2009 8:25:40 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

Ok, here’s what’s happening. a turbo increases power by boosting the intake. Doing so increases the required fuel to maintain proper fuel air ratio. A compound turbo boosts power without any increase in fuel demand. How? because a compound turbo doesn’t boost intake pressure. It dumps all it’s energy directly to the crankshaft. More power without more fuel or more heat or more manifold pressure.

I think you should understand it now, right?

In WWII, they gave up on the compound turbo because they realized the output shaft of the turbo was producing more power than the output shaft of the engine. So they decided to get rid of the engine all together and just have the turbo...

That’s what we call a TURBOPROP.


22 posted on 08/23/2009 8:25:42 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
Yup...probably the most popular aviation turbo-compound was the Wright-Cyclone 3350..


23 posted on 08/23/2009 8:29:58 PM PDT by Niteflyr ("Just because something is free doesn't mean it's good for you".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

If you are dumping mechanical energy directly to the crankshaft, what are you doing?

Answer: Driving the #$^& wheels. Or if it is a plane, you are driving the prop.

Just read the wiki article like I said.


24 posted on 08/23/2009 8:30:02 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Niteflyr

The last of the turbo compounds were used in the final versions of civilian piston airliners (before the conversion to the turbine technology of today)...and also notably the B-29 Superfortress bomber...


25 posted on 08/23/2009 8:35:38 PM PDT by Niteflyr ("Just because something is free doesn't mean it's good for you".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Niteflyr

That connection at the crank is NOT turbine power going back to the crankshaft, That’s one stage of this compound turbine POWERED by the crank. you can see the boost side tubing running to the intake side top rear of the engine, as well as the exhaust side pipes running to the back of the unit from both sides of the engine to a “t” joint. The crank drives an secondary turbo charger which compresses the compressed air from the primary turbocharger at the rear.


26 posted on 08/23/2009 8:38:46 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
Sorry, your not dumping mechanical energy to the crankshaft with ANY exhaust driven turbocharger.

Your compressing air and dumping into the intake. period.

It's not a jet engine, it's a piston engine.

27 posted on 08/23/2009 8:42:17 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

and look at that wiki page, and read it yourself. see the pic? thats a Nomad engine. See that pointy thing after the turbo? thats the air intake for the compressor side of the unit.


28 posted on 08/23/2009 8:44:09 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
"Sorry, your not dumping mechanical energy to the crankshaft with ANY exhaust driven turbocharger."

But a lot of diesel mechanics would laugh if you tried.

29 posted on 08/23/2009 8:47:20 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

the secondary turbine’s output is hydrodynamically coupled to the engine’s drive gears.

I know what that means. i would think you should be able to read it and understand what it says too.


30 posted on 08/23/2009 8:50:00 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

Are you sure it’s not the exhaust outlet?


31 posted on 08/23/2009 8:52:06 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

ping


32 posted on 08/23/2009 8:59:43 PM PDT by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Truck diesel engines are already "blowdown" type turbochargers, they don't use superchargers driven by the crankshaft as this wiki article suggests.

Huh? Detroit Diesel engines have a LONG history of using "roots" superchargers, in fact the 4/71 and 6/71 "roots blowers" (which later made their way to hot rods and drag racers) were standard on Detroit Diesels (the 8/71 and larger were aftermarket, rather than GMC manufactured.)

Take another look at the design. The "compound turbocharger" is NOT used to increase the intake charge density. What's happening here that the exhaust gasses from a 2 stroke engine power a turbine whos output shaft is coupled to the engine's output shaft, thereby using some of the wasted power from the exhaust gasses and using that to augment the output of the 2 stroke engine.

Regarding the compound turnbsharger, this has nothing to do with the intake side.

Mark

33 posted on 08/23/2009 9:02:50 PM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Here's the direct quote from Wiki-

A Turbo-compound engine is a reciprocating engine that employs a blowdown turbine to recover energy from the exhaust gases.

The turbine is usually mechanically connected to the crankshaft but electric and hydraulic systems have been investigated as well.

The turbine increases the output of the engine without increasing its fuel consumption, thus reducing the specific fuel consumption. The turbine is referred to as a blowdown turbine (or power-recovery turbine), as it recovers the energy developed in the exhaust manifold during blowdown, that is the first period of the exhaust process when the piston still is on its expansion stroke (this is possible since the exhaust valves open before bottom dead center).

When a blowdown turbine is attached to an engine it will not reduce power due to exhaust gas flow restriction,

since a blow down turbine is a velocity turbine not a pressure turbine as is a turbo supercharger.

Mark

34 posted on 08/23/2009 9:12:29 PM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

You can see at this link:

http://www.pilotfriend.com/aero_engines/images2/40.jpg

The exhaust-driven turbine is not used to drive a compressor for the intake. Instead it is coupled to the output shaft and adds to the torque produced by the “main” engine.


35 posted on 08/23/2009 9:17:49 PM PDT by WayneM (Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Just sounds like the exhaust gases drive a turbine which is hydro-
dynamically connected to the drive gears..using waste energy
to help drive the wheels...decent idea.

I suppose this could work with a gasoline engine also. Anyone know
about that ?

How about using the waste heat to power stirling engines which
help recharge batteries in a hybrid?
I wonder if anyone has ever tried this combination:

Hybrid Car
High pressure(higher than normal diesel in diesel system)
and same in gas engine
Solar cell array on roof,trunklid, engine hood to recharge batteries.
Stirling engines to recover all waste heat(exhaust, cabin temp)
to recharge batteries
Superoverdrive transmission
Low final drive ratio
Super low coefficient of drag
I wonder if they could apply such considerations on the
new Volt.
Anybody here with a car engineering degree who would know
about these things?


36 posted on 08/23/2009 9:28:02 PM PDT by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Getready

Turbosteamer. BMW is building them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbosteamer


37 posted on 08/23/2009 9:31:17 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: barb-tex

If I remember correctly, the exhaust melted the asphalt pavement when they came to a stop.


38 posted on 08/23/2009 10:51:51 PM PDT by nightwalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WayneM
The exhaust-driven turbine is not used to drive a compressor for the intake. Instead it is coupled to the output shaft and adds to the torque produced by the “main” engine.

Interesting. I wonder if that recovered exhaust energy would be better utilized by dedicating that output shaft to, say, turning a generator in a hybrid application? Sounds like a natural for a large diesel-electric application - public transit buses, perhaps.

Seems like the configuration needed to return that energy directly to the engine's crankshaft (as per your linked image) would be a challenge in an automotive application. You'd likely have to tie it in to the front end of the crank, rather than the rear (as in aircraft applications).

39 posted on 08/24/2009 4:39:21 AM PDT by Charles Martel (NRA Lifetime Member since 1984; TSRA rookie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Getready

“I suppose this could work with a gasoline engine also. Anyone know about that ?”

When I was a kid we could fire a potato out of the exhaust pipe of my neighbors’ car. Does that count? ;-)


40 posted on 08/24/2009 5:09:37 AM PDT by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson