Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Rick Santorum trying to save the GOP from Sarah Palin?
http://trueslant.com/level/2009/08/12/is-rick-santorum-trying-to-save-the-gop-from-sarah-palin/ ^ | August 13, 2009 | Michael Roston

Posted on 08/13/2009 6:15:42 AM PDT by DB9

Is Rick Santorum trying to save the GOP from Sarah Palin?

Don't get out your hedge trimmers just yet, Rick - Image via Wikipedia Rick Santorum is testing the waters in Iowa for a possible presidential run in 2012 according to Jonathan Martin in Politico. But what I think he’s really doing is a favor for his friend Mitt Romney, hoping to undercut Sarah Palin’s votes within the Republican Party’s ‘base’ of religious voters, and, in his view, possibly saving the GOP in the process.

As Jonathan explains, Santorum is probably tilting at windmills – he’s just not electable:

But having been thumped by 18 percentage points in his bid for a third term and out of office since 2006, Santorum may have a difficult time appealing to a savvy Hawkeye state electorate that is likely to have a full complement of social conservatives to choose from.

“One of the things we’ve seen from the Iowa caucuses is candidates that appeal to the base do very well,” Santorum said when asked how his conservative profile would fit the state. “I think historically that’s always been sort of a key in Iowa. Whether I do or not, I don’t know—I mean, we’ll see.”

But I think that’s not really at issue here. Santorum just wants to cockblock Palin so that religious voters in Iowa will continue to pick doughy white guys like him instead of her.

And then Mitt Romney will race past a split base in Iowa.

I guess that would be a doughy orange guy. For starters, let’s go back to February 2008 when Mitt Romney was already virtually knocked out of the presidential race because of his poor showing in early primaries. Santorum took to the radio and came out swinging against John McCain, and had this to say about Romney in an appearance on Laura Ingraham’s show:

If you’re a Republican, if you’re a Republican in the broadest sense, there is only one place to go right now and that’s Mitt Romney.

That’s a pretty strong endorsement from one man to another he knew at that time would not be the GOP’s presidential candidate. Santorum was throwing his weight behind Romney not just out of spite, but because he believes in Mitt in the long-term. He knew McCain wasn’t going to win and was trying to elect his party’s eventual standard-bearer with his big mouth.

So that takes us to Palin. I don’t think Santorum cares for her, on a personal or political level. First, let’s look at the personal. When asked about the revelation that Bristol Palin was with child, this is what Santorum told The Hill about how Palin was dealing with her family:

You don’t want to see have a child going out, and obviously, getting involved in sex outside of marriage. That’s not a good thing. … You take something that is not a good thing, which is for her to be engaged in that activity, and you take what happened, which is a pregnancy, and you turn it into the best thing possible, which is that you love her, you support her, and you love and support that baby, and that’s what Sarah and her family is doing.

So, Bristol was doing something that Santorum was critical of, but thankfully Sarah was showing love and support for her and her baby. Many other conservative pols, as that article showed, were happy to leave it at statements that Palin’s family should not be a campaign issue. Santorum passed judgment on her daughter’s pre-marital behaviors, which is his coded way of saying, “if she was a better mother, she wouldn’t have this problem.”

Next, onto the political. Santorum appeared on Greta van Susteren’s Fox News show shortly after Palin announced she would resign as Alaska’s governor, and said the following:

Her biggest fans that I know is my wife, Karen (ph), and she loves her, and she felt really bad that she quit. She felt like, number one, it hurt her, it hurt Sarah. And number two, it hurt women in politics. And although my wife is not an elected official, she was very much a part of my career and she was always trying to promote women in politics. And it looks like, you know, she couldn’t take it, and that’s not a good thing for women.

And you know, I’m — I’m speaking for my wife, not for me. I’m not — I’m not telling you how I feel about it. That’s how she feels about it, and I think that’s — that’s probably going to — going to hurt. It’s going to hurt her.

That’s a pretty rough start. Saying of Palin, “My wife doesn’t like you,” is pretty much Santorum-speak for, “You are a two-bit former sportscaster snowbunny who doesn’t belong anywhere near Washington (where I’ve lived all the time for the past 15 years even though I pretended I was a senator from Pennsylvania for awhile). If my wife, a good, common Christian Republican woman is offended at your quitting the governorship, imagine how everyone else is going to feel.”

He then added:

I think it’s — you say 70 percent, you know, but that’s a question, you know, Would you vote for her for president against a Democrat? I mean, most Republicans will get 90 percent of the Republican vote, not 70. So I don’t think that’s necessarily a strong number for her, unfortunately.

Translation: A lot of Republicans are as creeped out by you as I am. There’s no way we’re letting you run away with the nomination by putting together a psychotic populist coalition of crazed birthers, Creationists, gun nuts, and security moms.

I suspect it’s going to be a long four years for the GOP.

The proof will ultimately be in who is funding Santorum’s politcking over the next four years. If you see Santorum and Romney getting a lot of donations from the same people to whatever pre-campaign PACs they set up, their efforts will obviously be coordinated. And watch for Santorum to constantly find ways to steadily and sneakily stick shivs in Palin’s belly like he did on that Greta appearance in July. Then you’ll see why he’s really flying to Iowa on a regular basis.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; brutusromney; mythromney; palin; palin2012; romneyantigop; romneyantipalin; romneybotantipalin; romneythrewelection; santorum2012; santorumantigop; stenchofromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: angkor

“The U.S. Congress is totally out of control.”

Naw, it is the fact that they are IN control that worries you and I. ;-)


41 posted on 08/13/2009 7:25:33 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

OK Nana......you have earned the right to sweep up the ashes. ;-)


42 posted on 08/13/2009 7:28:05 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DB9

Dear Rick:

Republicans who sell-out their nation, their constituents and the American people in general are NOT exactly in favor just now! Oh sure...you were of service to the ever classy Arlen Specter! And didn’t THAT work out well. Look for Arlen to repay that debt by making a profound gesture utterly contrary to HIS best interests REAL SOON!!!! You see, Rick, traitors are extremely popular with the party heads—the McCains, Grahams and Steeles just love your type. But actual CONSERVATIVES...that is, those who have always BEEN AND STILL ARE the republican party, do not like limp-wristed, spineless little unprincipled weasels. So do actual Americans—that is, CONSERVATIVES everywhere— a real favor and shut up, go home and re-discover the profound obscurity you so richly deserve.


43 posted on 08/13/2009 7:30:47 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Cinderella was the one who got the prince...

:)


44 posted on 08/13/2009 7:31:18 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Abby4116
I think you are shooting from the hip, not thinking. Bush wanted Specter. He was needed at the time to get Roberts and Alito confirmed (yes, I know they hadn't been named yet, but the openings were coming up). Had Santorum endorsed Toomey, I think you would be looking at Senator Hoeffel, which would have been much worse. PA was not about to elect Toomey.

You may call it shooting from the hip, but we are early in the history of what kind of 'judges' Roberts and Alito will be. Time will tell if there was 'wisdom' in throwing Toomey to the liberal wolves was the 'right' thing to do. Santorum used up his political capital by hooking up his boat to the liberal Spector one man kayak. Spector sure did repay that favor now didn't he?

There does come a time when the chaff has to be blown off the grains of the wheat and nobody can say yet that what Rove advised President Bush to do was in the best interest of this nation. Personally I prefer an unadulterated liberal than a play actor republican using the 'right' in this nation as their pinata.

45 posted on 08/13/2009 7:32:34 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Bama and Company are reenacting the Pharaoh as told by Moses in Genesis!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DB9
The author of this barely-disguised hit piece (Michael Roston) is a flaming left-winger who writes for HuffPo and the Village Voice.

Take what he says about the GOP with this:


46 posted on 08/13/2009 7:33:41 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
I like Rick Santorum, he's basically conservative, he's nice looking and he speaks good, however, he doesn't have the charisma that will be needed to run for President at this time in history....that certain something that makes people drop what they're doing and listen, that makes them want to attend an event just to hear him/her speak. Sorry to say, neither does Mitt Romney have it....

Sarah has "it". She speaks common sense about the everyday issues affecting our lives...she speaks in plain language and she speaks with conviction....she gets people fired up with her speeches. She reminds me of Rush when he started out twenty years ago...people were saying, "oh my God, he's saying out loud what I'm thinking."

That is exactly how it is with Sarah Palin. They're hearing from her exactly what they're thinking, and they're not hearing that from other politicians.

47 posted on 08/13/2009 7:38:00 AM PDT by Auntie Toots (The GOP has taken on new life..wirh Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment
Santorium is one of the good guys. He is experienced and has a very strong social conservative record. Yes, he lost in PA, but 2006 was tough on a lot of Republicans, particularly those in blue states.

I think Rick would make a very good candidate and if nothing else, bring proper attention to social conservative issues.

48 posted on 08/13/2009 7:39:31 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Check my post #12


49 posted on 08/13/2009 11:29:14 AM PDT by frogjerk (tagline pulled for verification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DB9

Ricky is a Slick Willardbot. Go away, Ricky.


50 posted on 08/13/2009 12:43:04 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB9
Santorum wrote a book about the upholding the traditional family in 2005. HE sugguested that the healthiest families are those which have a stay at home mom. Perhaps, Santorum think Palin needs to stay in the kitchen.
51 posted on 08/13/2009 12:48:40 PM PDT by yongin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB9; 2nd Amendment; andy58-in-nh; Arizona Carolyn; Bishop_Malachi; CharterOakie; Cheburashka; ...

Sarah will kick that soft-headed whiner’s but.

His only positive is that he is pro-life, and lots of dummacraps are just like him.


52 posted on 08/13/2009 1:12:14 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

I have always liked Santorum but if he plays spoiler for Romney(or anybody else does like Huckabee)...his/their name will be dirt in our home!


53 posted on 08/13/2009 1:26:16 PM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Agreed.


54 posted on 08/13/2009 1:42:16 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DB9
It doesn't matter if they undercut Palin in the primaries.

GRASSROOTS ARE NOT GOING TO SUPPORT SLICK MITT!
Santorum, you are a tool and putting you and your elitist GOP friends' selfish goals ahead of what's good for the nation.

55 posted on 08/13/2009 7:26:43 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("It (Gov't) can't make you happier, healthier, wealthier, and wise" - Sarah Palin 07/26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB9

Sara Palin will run for President as the head of a Third Party.

The RINOs will back Santorum or Pawlenty.

This split will put Obama back in for four more years.

You read it here first.


56 posted on 08/13/2009 7:31:06 PM PDT by Palladin (Me to Gubmint Healthcare Counselor: "Get your ass out of here or YOU will be in intensive care!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB9
I heard ricksanitizer say that he WOULD NEVER RUN IN POLITICS AGAIN DUE TO FAMILY REASONS... if the man runs again... he is a liar like 99% of those pukes in DC today... NO MORE FAKES AND NO MORE LIARS!

LLS

57 posted on 08/17/2009 4:19:27 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson