Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Iran seeking nuclear weapons technology: ElBaradei"

Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:51pm EDT

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE55G21V20090617

Iran wants the ability to build nuclear weapons to gain the reputation of a major power in the Middle East, the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog said in a BBC interview broadcast on Wednesday.

1 posted on 08/10/2009 1:43:25 PM PDT by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: james500
That statement alone identifies him as a lying hack whose opinion on the matter is of no value whatsoever.
2 posted on 08/10/2009 1:44:54 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james500
"One of the main justifications for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 by the administration of President George W. Bush was the assertion that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction."

Actually is was about not honoring the surrender agreement. The MSM made the Iraq War into a single issue war.

3 posted on 08/10/2009 1:47:50 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james500

Iran, not Iraq, always was the greater threat to the US.

I wish we would have kept out powder dry for Iran. Unfortunately, we have fewer options today than what we had before Iraq II.

(not flaming President Bush)


4 posted on 08/10/2009 1:48:19 PM PDT by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james500
One of the main justifications for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 by the administration of President George W. Bush was the assertion that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. No such weapons were found in the years since the war began.

There is evidence that Saddam was seeking such weapons.

A convicted felon out on parole seeking a firearm is still guilty of violating probation even if he doesn't acquire the gun.

Saddam resumed the first Gulf War when he violated the terms of the peace.

And there has not been anything to dispute the claims that weapons may have been smuggled out (to Syria) during the run up to the invasion date.

5 posted on 08/10/2009 1:50:14 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james500

IAEA? Isn’t that the store that sells cheap, Chinese slave labor produced furniture you have to assemble yourself?


7 posted on 08/10/2009 1:54:12 PM PDT by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james500

He’s a friggin a-hole liar.

The most reliable counts of deaths due the US invasion of Iraq but the figure around 100,000 — most were combatants.

How many did Saddam kill? At least 100,000 Kurds were killed or disappeared under Saddam’s rule. His total count — over 2 million, including the Iran-Iraq wars.

The US, George W. Bush in the lead, have saved the lives of the hundreds of thousands by taking out that genocidal tyrant.


11 posted on 08/10/2009 1:57:06 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james500
Awww...Saddam and Son's defense team still bawling over their deaths?

So sad that these UN racists don't have Saddam's $$$$ to blow up Israeli kids in their school buses, restaurants, or clubs anymore.

13 posted on 08/10/2009 1:58:52 PM PDT by roses of sharon (It is not actual suffering but a taste of better things which excites people to revolt: Hoffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james500
“That hundreds of thousands of people lost their lives on the basis of fiction, not facts, makes me shudder,” ElBaradei said.”

Yeah right I guess we should have tried him also having inside information.. If El-Idiot-oughto there took these numbers and applied them as the lives saved by killing Saddam he would be close on the very low side..

17 posted on 08/10/2009 2:07:17 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james500

ElBaradei is the guy who has never stopped anyone from getting a nuke. Ever.

His job, as he sees it, is not to stop them but rather just to document the process. He is a fairly useless man heading a fairly useless agency.


18 posted on 08/10/2009 2:08:05 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james500
"We are not sure that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons. The jury is still out," ElBaradei said.

Right. The jury is still out.

He still has more reports to file. Then when they pop off a nuke, he'll write up another report.

As I say, the guy and the agency are useless.

20 posted on 08/10/2009 2:10:11 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james500

When someone says, “the jury is still out on Iran”, what does it mean, actually? Do they need to see Iran showing off a nuclear weapon in a national parade, and go, “Oh yeah, they do have nuclear weapon program...”?


26 posted on 08/10/2009 3:02:22 PM PDT by paudio (Road to hell is paved by unintended consequences of good intentions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james500

——— “One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.” President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

“If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.” President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

“Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.” Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.” Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, ‘98

“We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.” Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.” Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

“Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.” Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of St ate, Nov. 10, ‘99

“There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.” Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

“We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.” Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.” Al Gore, Sept. 2002

“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.” Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.” Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 (Now who is lying???)

“The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons...” Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

“I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force— if necessary— to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.” Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.” Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

“He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do” Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.” Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.” Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

“Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real.” Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003


28 posted on 08/10/2009 3:12:01 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: james500

ElBaradei was upset because it took his title of “the most important person in the world” away. When Iran launches a nuclear attack he will say “we didn’t know”. He wants to keep searching but more so he doesn’t want to find anything. Paging Hans Blix


32 posted on 08/10/2009 6:51:35 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson