Skip to comments.
LIVE vote - Sotomayor vote
CSPAN2 ^
| 8-6-09
Posted on 08/06/2009 12:05:28 PM PDT by STARWISE
Votes presently
Ds= 69
Rs = 31
______________
Pubbies:
Vitter Alexander Martinez
so far voting AYE!
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; scotus; sotomayor; vitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: GeronL
How many GOPers will vote against her? Probably not many
Only the ones with an ounce of integrity.
To: null and void
Another incompetent piece of trash added to the Obama administration.
22
posted on
08/06/2009 12:17:31 PM PDT
by
mulligan
To: STARWISE
La Raza in the Supreme Court. Great. (Did anybody in the hearings ask her about her membership in this racist organization?)
23
posted on
08/06/2009 12:17:34 PM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: 13Sisters76
I heard an Isaacson voting no .. is there
more than 1 with that name ?
24
posted on
08/06/2009 12:17:51 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
To: Bobkk47
25
posted on
08/06/2009 12:19:31 PM PDT
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
To: beethovenfan
Remember, racism only counts when it is the racism of “whitey” — all other ethnic groups get a free pass.
To: STARWISE
Martinez is clearly a racist.
27
posted on
08/06/2009 12:20:43 PM PDT
by
Schnucki
To: boomop1
I am shocked!! shocked!! Never saw it comin.. Say it ain’t so.
28
posted on
08/06/2009 12:21:24 PM PDT
by
acsrp38
(The founders READ the Constitution BEFORE they signed it)
To: STARWISE
The RINO's are(all voted yes)
Alexander
Bond
Collins
Graham
Gregg
Lugar
Martinez
Snowe
Voinovich
29
posted on
08/06/2009 12:21:48 PM PDT
by
walsh
To: acsrp38
The vote 68 to 31, according to the AL Franken sound bite Hannity just played
30
posted on
08/06/2009 12:22:29 PM PDT
by
Son House
(President Øbama Turns His Back On The Oppressed During Their Darkest Hours)
To: beethovenfan
My stupid senator, Voinovich voted Yay. He should’ve put a D in front of his name years ago. Thank God, he’s going out to pasture in 2010 - retiring. He votes with the Dems most of the time. What a useless pos. He used to be our governor here in Ohio, and wasn’t any good at that either. Hope we get a good conservative to fill his seat next year.
31
posted on
08/06/2009 12:24:51 PM PDT
by
Catsrus
To: STARWISE; All
32
posted on
08/06/2009 12:25:19 PM PDT
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: acsrp38
Jeeeeeeze ... Judd Gregg voting AYE ??????????????????
and
The traitorous 9
Alexander
Bond
Collins
Graham
Gregg
Lugar
Martinez
Snowe
Voinivich
Kennedy .. absent
33
posted on
08/06/2009 12:26:12 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
To: STARWISE
Congratulations!
34
posted on
08/06/2009 12:29:49 PM PDT
by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: 13Sisters76
I’m not surprised. Isakson has got to go.
35
posted on
08/06/2009 12:31:27 PM PDT
by
Heart of Georgia
(BHO Administration = America-destroying thugs)
To: STARWISE
Certainly is a sign of the times and what direction they’re pushing for this country to go.... and it certainly isn’t toward freedom or protecting what it is that made this country the best in the world
36
posted on
08/06/2009 12:33:17 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Americans, just reading the bills and doing the jobs their representatives won't do)
To: STARWISE
Have there been any further insights on her stance on Roe v. Wade?
37
posted on
08/06/2009 12:34:10 PM PDT
by
funkyant
To: GeronL
Vitter has caved (?), as he knows liberals are out to get him in 2010. This vote will make it easier for the liberals to get him out of the Senate.
To: Catsrus
You have my sympathy in trying to convince the blockheads of OH of the error of their ways.
To: Theodore R.
Apparently Vitter voted “No”, as expected. Liberals are still out to remove him.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
