Posted on 08/06/2009 11:53:16 AM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com
It’s looking more and more like the forged “Kenyan birth certificate” released by Orly Taitz on Sunday was a prank by a supporter of President Obama. Politijab points to an anonymous blogger at FearlessBlogging, who has uploaded four photos of the original forgery and a mocking declaration:
Fine cotton business paper: $11Inkjet printer: $35
1940 Royal Model KMM manual typewriter: $10
2 Shilling coin: $1
Pilot Varsity fountain pen: $3
Punkin’ the Birthers: Priceless
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonindependent.com ...
Yes, they ran Edwards out of town!!!
Can't you read??
Who has said any unjustified reproach???
Maybe he is the one who sold it on Ebay and she bought it - what she does with it is her business.
Do you honestly think that it is the duty of a court to take any document an attorney gives them and authenticate it.
If an attorney cannot authenticate a document he is submitting then he may as well paper his office with it.
Yikes! Sounds too much like “identity politics” for my taste.
What happened to him after he was exposed on gay.com, hmmm???
Orly and a cast of 100s of thousands?
If you know anything about the different types of paper stock you can tell at a glance, it is not difficult. On Wednesday before this new picture of the paper carton came to light I recognized it was 8 1/2 x by 11 and said so.
I am familiar with both the American and European sizes.
You should have added a comment about what fun this whole affair has been for the Freepers in general. I for one had a great time reading and posting to the various threads. It's fun watching the FR Investigative Engine get revved up and really cranking. The fact of the matter is that it is something awesome to behold (just ask Dan Rather). Anybody here that feels their motivation has been injured by this affair is free to leave. Not me. On to the next battle. |
I agree... not to mention I learned a lot about Kenyan history ;)
No good riggers.
The SIN is that OBOZO is allowed to make a Mockery of OUR AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AND AMERICA! as he hides his Legal Birth Certificate while presenting a Forgery and/or a Worthless State Document and traveling the World Apologizing for Manufactured Lies about OUR AMERICA! and Obviously Not OBOZO’S AMERICA!
re:
“What are you talking about?
Can’t you read??
Who has said any unjustified reproach???”
Just by suggesting that I cannot read, you are flinging a reproach on me right there. It is wholly unjustified, because I can read. Also I thought you knew what the word “reproach” meant.
Re: “If you know anything about the different types of paper stock you can tell at a glance, it is not difficult.”
That’s great, but how would you explain that to a courtroom? Anything concrete or measurable?
Does this Wretched Picture cause anyone else to have a Barf Tsunami? or was it just me?*
Note: The picture technically is fine, its just the subject:-(
The only reasonable explanations are that he would not be Commander in Chief should the certificate(s) be released or the he would only be CinC until January 20 2013, if his own party didn't boot him out first.
In the courtroom one would have the physical document, not a digital representation.
We all know what can be done with digital images.
8 1/2” x 11” seems easily measurable as would 210mm x 297mm
If the Kenyan government refused to authenticate or refute the document, wouldn't the next stop be a Kenyan court?
However, as I said before, she did have the obligation to prove that the document wasn't an obvious forgery first. A jewelers loop is sufficient to discern if a document is a product of ink jet or laser technology and this cursory inspection by a document examiner would seem to be the threshold of what might be expected as due diligence in this.
I would think another essential element of due diligence would have been to obtain an account of the document's provenance from the source of the document. That was the cause of my immediate skepticism when I first heard of the document. Who would have requested the certificate in 1964, I asked myself, and how did it subsequently fall into unfriendly hands? Not having a satisfactory answer, I started off assuming it was a forgery.
Also, it appears Orly never had anything to examine beyond the bad photo of the document that was posted on the web. Zooming in on digital images of limited resolution is no substitute for a loupe on a physical document, as numerous posters on these threads have learned. Is it an E or K?? LOL! Sheesh! Pixel abuse is no way to examine documents.
Aahh, but there is no legal proof of that. The Long Form/Certificate of Live Birth would be one piece of that proof which is likely why it, if it exists, is locked away in a vault in Hawai`i.
Best educational I’ve had in a long time and it was enjoyable.
wouldn’t the copy have been made, then photographed and either electronically transmitted or mailed? even if it was scanned, or generated in photoshop or some other image editing/graphics software, it was still made in one of those forms and transmitted somehow.
That to me seems to fit the bill, but I’m not a lawyer - I just have read an awful lot of legal garbage, so my brain may be stew as it is...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.