Skip to comments.
White House: 'War on terrorism' is over ('Jihadists' and 'global war' no longer acceptable terms)
The Washington Times ^
| August 6, 2009
| Jon Ward
Posted on 08/06/2009 9:56:08 AM PDT by jazusamo
It's official. The U.S. is no longer engaged in a "war on terrorism." Neither is it fighting "jihadists" or in a "global war."
President Obama's top homeland security and counterterrorism official took all three terms off the table of acceptable words inside the White House during a speech Thursday at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank.
"The President does not describe this as a 'war on terrorism,'" said John Brennan, head of the White House homeland security office, who outlined a "new way of seeing" the fight against terrorism.
The only terminology that Mr. Brennan said the administration is using is that the U.S. is "at war with al Qaeda."
"We are at war with al Qaeda," he said. "We are at war with its violent extremist allies who seek to carry on al Qaeda's murderous agenda."
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in March that the administration was not using the term "war on terror" but no specific directive had come from the White House itself. Mr. Obama himself used the term "war on terror" on Jan. 23, his fourth day as president, but has not used it since.
Mr. Brennan's speech was aimed at outlining ways in which the Obama administration intends to undermine the "upstream" factors that create an environment in which terrorists are bred.
The president's adviser talked about increasing aid to foreign governments for building up their militaries and social and democratic institutions, but provided few details about how the White House will do that.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: agenda; bho44; bhogwot; counterterrorism; crushislam; democras; democrats; dhimmicrats; globalwar; islam; islamicterrorism; jihadist; obama; politicalcorrectness; terrorism; terrorists; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
08/06/2009 9:56:08 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
To: All
Please bump the Freepathon and donate if you havent done so!
2
posted on
08/06/2009 9:57:36 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
Well....’kiss my butt’ is still ‘kiss my butt’.
3
posted on
08/06/2009 9:59:49 AM PDT
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Obama. Clear and Pres__ent Danger.)
To: jazusamo
“....increasing aid to foreign governments...”
Unbelievable. He is going to throw more away overseas with much going to our enemies at a time when the economy is totally trashed.
4
posted on
08/06/2009 10:00:50 AM PDT
by
rod1
To: rod1
Yep, he’s got some extra money from cutting military spending. The turkey’s doing exactly what he said he’d do when campaigning.
5
posted on
08/06/2009 10:03:25 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
Glibness. Proper words are the true end of those who govern. We will probably be attacked again. “The Divine One” and his Apostles virtually guarantee that. This creatures governance will dissolve into near chaos. What a mess!
6
posted on
08/06/2009 10:04:00 AM PDT
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: jazusamo
The Thug clearly desires a terrorist attack so that he can impose Martial Law, suspend all elections indefinitely, and start rounding up opponents for "re-education".
7
posted on
08/06/2009 10:08:27 AM PDT
by
kromike
To: jazusamo
Obama has decided to surrender to foreign Islamic terrorists so he can concentrate on fighting the vast right wing conspiracy terrorists here at home. Or, to look at it another way, He's confidant that if He can't destroy the nation himself, he'll need to position foreign enemies to do so.
There is almost no deed so Unamerican or so despicable that someone could suggest Obama is up to that I would immediately disbelieve.
To: jazusamo
I hope that someone in the White house remembered to give this memo to the various Jihadists groups around the globe. They all need to know that they must be affiliated with al Qaeda to attack the United States under the current Obama administration. I know they would all like to avoid the embarrassment of following improper procedure while employing terrorism.
To: dog breath
Good point. The US did not start the Jihad; the only way that the Jihadists will not strike us again is if they believe that Obama is one of them and he is in the process of Jihad within the US.
10
posted on
08/06/2009 10:18:43 AM PDT
by
madinmadtown
(Nuclear...better to mispronounce it, than not understand it.)
To: bitterohiogunclinger
Russian tanks cruising down our streets?
Could it happen?
11
posted on
08/06/2009 10:23:14 AM PDT
by
Califreak
(My word calibrator's in the shop)
To: dog breath
Absolutely, there’s a lot of jihadists that aren’t al Qaeda out there.
12
posted on
08/06/2009 10:26:47 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
BARACK OBAMA CONCEDES DEFEAT IN WAR ON TERROR.
13
posted on
08/06/2009 10:37:35 AM PDT
by
paulycy
(Screw the RACErs.)
To: jazusamo
Bo Tox is a jihadist. The enemy within.
Will we re-elect this traitor?
BO Tox is doomed.
14
posted on
08/06/2009 10:43:34 AM PDT
by
Candor7
(The weapons of choice against fascism are ridicule ,derision ,truth. (member NRA)
To: jazusamo
What next? Is he going to turn the White House into a mosque?
To: Catholic Canadian
To: jazusamo
Snerdley just asked "who won"
Excellent question, will someone ask "the one"?
17
posted on
08/06/2009 10:46:49 AM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Americans, just reading the bills and doing the jobs their representatives won't do)
To: jazusamo
And Obama’s ‘War On America’ has begun!
18
posted on
08/06/2009 10:48:06 AM PDT
by
penelopesire
("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
To: jazusamo
Mute Point since we DO NOT have a whitehouse as we know it!
19
posted on
08/06/2009 10:48:14 AM PDT
by
Cheetahcat
(Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
To: jazusamo
Terrorism good, al Qaeda bad.
Is that the jist of it?
what a bunch of assholes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson