Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

W.H. on offense on health care rumors
Politico ^ | August 4th, 2009 | Carrie Budoff Brown

Posted on 08/04/2009 5:12:17 PM PDT by Cheap_Hessian

The White House launched a coordinated effort Tuesday to combat what it calls a “viral whisper campaign” to torpedo health care reform.

Its playbook: the same one Barack Obama’s campaign used in 2008 to shoot down rumors and questions about his citizenship, faith and patriotism.

The new offensive started early Tuesday morning when the White House posted a video response to a hodgepodge of clips on the Drudge Report that portrayed President Obama as favoring the elimination of private insurance. On the White House blog, Obama’s director of new media, Macon Phillips, asked supporters to send in leads for debunking chain e-mails or anything else that “seems fishy.”

It continued through the day with press secretary Robert Gibbs and Democratic National Committee spokesman Brad Woodhouse both saying a series of confrontational town hall meetings were manufactured by Republicans, conservative groups and lobbyists who are paid to drum up opposition.

Woodhouse described them as “angry mobs of rabid right-wing extremists” that populated McCain-Palin rallies last year.

Tuesday was just the start of the offensive, White House aides said.

The White House and its allies are developing a clearinghouse website to debunk rumors and myths — similar to the FightTheSmears.com site used during the campaign. They plan to use more video, Twitter, e-mail lists and other new media tools to “combat the right-wing noise machine” and dedicate new resources to rapid response on health care, according to a White House official.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bho44; bhofascism; bhohealthcare; bhotyranny; communism; denialaintariver; dncbrownshirts; dnctalkingpoints; donttreadonme; fubo; healthcare; healthers; liberalfascism; marxism; obama; obamabrownshirts; obamacare; socializedmedicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 08/04/2009 5:12:17 PM PDT by Cheap_Hessian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

They are certainly OFFENDING a lot of people.


2 posted on 08/04/2009 5:14:36 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian
Alinsky tactics doesn't work very well on an informed public...


3 posted on 08/04/2009 5:15:35 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

You know, the thing about Twitter is anyone can go to a particular hash (#) tag thread and post. Ahem. Such as # White House Health Care. Ahem.


4 posted on 08/04/2009 5:16:23 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian
obama change   hope  sucks kool aid sexy Pictures, Images and Photos
5 posted on 08/04/2009 5:16:46 PM PDT by AmericanSphinx71 (Emanuel and Axelrod - The new Haldeman and Ehrlichman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

An informed public with a multitude of means of communication. We’ll go to Short Wave and Morse Code if we have to.


6 posted on 08/04/2009 5:17:15 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
When Alinsky wrote his rules he didn't know about instant news and the Internet...


7 posted on 08/04/2009 5:19:56 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian
re: W.H. on offense on health care rumors

MSM spin alert! Notice the slick use of the word ‘rumors’ in the headline! They know a lot of people won't read beyond that and will be left with the impression that all the stories about the shortcomings of the current effort are just rumors. It's all about bias and spin and being in the pocket of The One.

An unbiased headline would say “W.H. on offense on health care claims” or some such non-loaded word. Rumors is pejorative term in and of itself.

The deck is certainly stacked against those who are beginning to sound the alarm as to what a danger this man and his cohorts are to America.

8 posted on 08/04/2009 5:22:35 PM PDT by jwparkerjr (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Yup. He relied on limited venues of information such as they were 40 years ago.


9 posted on 08/04/2009 5:22:59 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

When you starting screwing around with people’s pocketbooks and quality of life, they tend to turn hostile very quickly.

Also, I really don’t believe that most people are as left-leaning as some would like to believe. I also thing many people were completely hoodwinked by this bastard. Having an opponent like Mcpain didn’t help matters much either.

Let these Dim Bulbs continue to overreach and see how many come out of this without getting burned.


10 posted on 08/04/2009 5:23:20 PM PDT by grimalkin (Under capitalism everybody is the architect of his own fortune. - Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
No they don't. Just a reminder for those who don't know.

Rules for Radicals


In 1971, Saul Alinsky wrote an entertaining classic on grassroots organizing titled Rules for Radicals. Those who prefer cooperative tactics describe the book as out-of-date. Nevertheless, it provides some of the best advice on confrontational tactics. Alinsky begins this way:
What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.

His “rules” derive from many successful campaigns where he helped poor people fighting power and privilege

For Alinsky, organizing is the process of highlighting what is wrong and convincing people they can actually do something about it. The two are linked. If people feel they don’t have the power to change a bad situation, they stop thinking about it.

According to Alinsky, the organizer — especially a paid organizer from outside — must first overcome suspicion and establish credibility. Next the organizer must begin the task of agitating: rubbing resentments, fanning hostilities, and searching out controversy. This is necessary to get people to participate. An organizer has to attack apathy and disturb the prevailing patterns of complacent community life where people have simply come to accept a bad situation. Alinsky would say, “The first step in community organization is community disorganization.”

Through a process combining hope and resentment, the organizer tries to create a “mass army” that brings in as many recruits as possible from local organizations, churches, services groups, labor unions, corner gangs, and individuals.

Alinsky provides a collection of rules to guide the process. But he emphasizes these rules must be translated into real-life tactics that are fluid and responsive to the situation at hand.

Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.

Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people.
The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.

Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”

Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.

Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”

Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. When Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of O’Hare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the city’s reputation.

Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”

Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.

According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. “The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”


11 posted on 08/04/2009 5:30:18 PM PDT by CajunConservative (ObamaCare. It's "shovel ready"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

"These mobs are bussed in by well funded, highly organized groups run by Republican operatives."

12 posted on 08/04/2009 5:33:54 PM PDT by Wardenclyffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian
“viral whisper campaign”?

ROTFL! What a bunch of audibly challenged idiots! Americans are SHOUTING! Hell no to Socialism/Communism and death. There isn't any "whisper" to it!

13 posted on 08/04/2009 5:41:48 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Stop the DemocRATS' War On America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CajunConservative
Every one of these "rules" can be used by our side too. We're the radicals now, anyway. At least according to some.

Some thoughts:

Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

Or than communists can live up to communism. It's the specifics that make them into fools and hypocrites. Our side is using this rule to destroy Obama Death Care. Just keep asking the question: will Members of Congress and the President be signing up for Obama Death Care? Why can't voters and taxpayers sign up for the plan the National Democrats in Congress get?

Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

Listened to Paul Shanklin's latest bit on Rush's show?

How 'bout this:

Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”

I'm thinking of the folks who chased Queen Hillary's Health Care Express bus out of every town it showed up in, back in 1994. I'm sure there's fun to be had now, or will be.

Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.

Tell that to Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson.

Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”

'Nuff said.

Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. When Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of O’Hare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the city’s reputation.

Look at the reaction of the National Democrats to the threat of the real story of Obama's BC coming out.

Look at their reaction to the threat posed by a Sarah Palin candidacy in 2012. 'Nuff said.

Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”

We've gotta work more on this one.

Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.

Oh, just watch us. Heh heh.

14 posted on 08/04/2009 6:11:51 PM PDT by Steely Tom (RKBA: last line of defense against vote fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
Those rumors wouldn't be: " . . . a hodgepodge of clips on the Drudge Report that portrayed President Obama as favoring the elimination of private insurance.

Or, in other words, HIS OWN WORDS!

15 posted on 08/04/2009 6:18:27 PM PDT by sportutegrl (If liberals could do math, they would be conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs accuses conservatives of "manufacturing anger".

16 posted on 08/04/2009 7:19:11 PM PDT by gitmo (History books will read that Lincoln freed the slaves and Obama enslaved the free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheap_Hessian

“viral whisper campaign”

I see they found a new term for people who don’t want what he’s peddling. A term or rather an excuse for this debacle if their mad push goes down in defeat.


17 posted on 08/04/2009 7:55:20 PM PDT by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: long hard slogger; FormerACLUmember; Harrius Magnus; hocndoc; parousia; Hydroshock; skippermd; ...


Socialized Medicine aka Universal Health Care PING LIST

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or removed from this ping list.

**This is a high volume ping list! (sign of the times)**


18 posted on 08/05/2009 10:18:17 AM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CajunConservative
Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.

This one will work when calling congressional offices. Imagine the poor interns answering phones who are hit with "How can work for a person who would do this to our country? Shame on you" as an ending to some of our calls. I really want their staffers to have to make the choice of quitting or having a mental break.

19 posted on 08/05/2009 11:38:41 AM PDT by lovesdogs (I will not lay down and die. This is my country and with God's help I will take it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: socialismisinsidious

Obama says he wants you to call him and report the lies.

Phone Numbers

Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FAX: 202-456-2461

You can also call or write to the President:

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Please include your e-mail address

Or use their online form here
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/


20 posted on 08/05/2009 11:40:10 AM PDT by listenhillary (90% of our problems could be resolved with a government 10% of the size it is now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson