1 posted on
08/04/2009 1:00:09 PM PDT by
topher
To: topher
Yeah. Opening them packets used to drive me nuts!
2 posted on
08/04/2009 1:02:24 PM PDT by
woofer
('Senator Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth' - Steyn)
To: topher
I hate condoms. glad I am free from them now !
To: topher
To: topher
Safe sex with condoms, is probably a lot better for mental health than no sex.
5 posted on
08/04/2009 1:04:15 PM PDT by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.)
To: topher
Sex without condoms is better than sex with condoms? Any teenager could tell you that. This is not really earth shattering news.
6 posted on
08/04/2009 1:05:09 PM PDT by
Uncle Hal
To: topher
“heterosexual sex without using condoms is more likely to make people happy than “safe sex” with condoms”
in other news the sky is blue
yeesh someone paid to have this study done anyone could have told these guys that
7 posted on
08/04/2009 1:05:09 PM PDT by
DM1
To: topher
This may explain the actions of the guys at nbn.
8 posted on
08/04/2009 1:05:14 PM PDT by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Please God Save The United States From Barack Hussein Al-Obama. Amen.)
To: topher
Yep. That’s why sailors getting into port are all so miserable. Facing the prospect of all those condoms...
To: topher
What in the world is an “immature psychological defense mechanism” with regards to sex? Always great when researchers just blow smoke ... ooops probably should have said something more mature
To: topher
What bothers me most about this drivel is that someone got PAID good money for even attempting this “research”.
Some folls are all too soon parted from their money.
Governments in general worldwide need to review what they spend taxpayer money on.
This is ludicrous.
AIDS is anough of a problem all over the globe. This “research” doesn’t help one little bit.
To: topher
1950 definition of ‘Safe Sex’: Use a padded headboard!
14 posted on
08/04/2009 1:19:50 PM PDT by
TRY ONE
(NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
To: topher
Peter Tatchell, one of Britain's leading homosexualist spokesmen, called the research "unscientific and extreme" and said it contradicted other studies by the US sex researchers Masters and Johnson. Tatchell said, "Brody's is an extreme and disparaging stance to adopt and he seems to have an ideological agenda to promote conventional heterosexual intercourse."
Brody responded at the time, "The radical left wants sex research done, but only if the results are politically acceptable to them."
At least one reason I can think of is that Masters and Johnson paired up total strangers to observe them having sex. They were two of the architects of the Marxist sex revolution in this country, and they were marital cheaters as well.
This researcher interviewed people who presumably chose their own partners.
17 posted on
08/04/2009 1:23:31 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
("Media: quit making things up." --Sarah Palin)
To: topher
If you are using a condom, you might worry about the diseases that woman has.
If you are using a condom, you might worry about the condom breaking and her becoming pregnant.
If...
However, no condom, you are more “secure” in thinking “everything’s covered” or “what’s the harm”. You may also be in a committed relationship.
You can abort away a pregnancy but you can’t abort an STD.
20 posted on
08/04/2009 1:30:34 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
To: topher
24 posted on
08/04/2009 1:41:50 PM PDT by
668 - Neighbor of the Beast
("Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless.")
To: topher
Bad news for Sebelius and 7-Eleven.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson