Posted on 08/04/2009 8:02:34 AM PDT by Red Steel
Nevermind I found it:
EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489
Not to stir a hornets’ nest, but have the birth announcements been authenticated? Has anyone examined the actual microfilm and done an age analysis?
It would be interesting to contact the other folks named in those announcements (like the twins) and see if they kept a clipping from the newspaper in their baby book.
I think we need to apply equal forensic standards to all documents.
And, if this has been done and I missed it, I apologize in advance.
bookmark
YES, there were many, many reasons for Obama to be “registered” at a Hawaii hospital, even if not born in Hawaii.
BTW, why can't Obama even be sure WHICH hospital he was born in? Check the records, yourself.
The Obama camp has been all over the map, on that one!
Under the law, that could be considered ‘Consciousness of Guilt’. Obama and the democrats have demonstrated many such ‘Consciousness Of Guilt’ moves of late...and so has the media.
0bama wasted to time signing Executive Order 13489, signed on January 21, 2009.
0bama wasted no time signing Executive Order 13489, signed on January 21, 2009.
He is not my boy, $hitbird!
Independence Day
I thought I remembered reading in obamafile that there was no published newspaper announcement of the birth of the twins born the same day at the same hospital. But that their physician father did have a medical clinic address on Kalanianiole Hwy.
We are also pressing Hawaii if they released the short form birth certificate. We have reason to believe they did not.
!!!!!??
I want to defeat Democrats in 2010 and 2012 and get OBAMA out of Office in 2012.
It is as far as I see fit to "think that one through".
What was the name of the Clinton Secretary of Trade who disapared many years ago? Ron Brown. Why would Hillary fly suddenly to Kenya on Monday evening. I Pray for her safety.
Hopefully she doesn’t have a meeting scheduled with Raila Odinga?
You think that the belief that one man and his agenda trump the US Constitution .... is “minor”?
That it is minor he would swear an oath in front of the entire nation and world to support and defend the US Constitution while knowingly defrauding it? And that an entire national political and media establishment would abet this?
That is a significant dividing line
Corsi is saying that short form could be a possible forgery because Hawaii may not have issued Obama the COLB on June 6, 2007. So WND is asking Hawaii if they issued a short form COLB to Obama then when? The answer would not violate any of Hawaii’s silly BC privacy law(s). Hawaii is stalling.
Of course you realize that this dividing line makes us all racist...that’s what team 0bama is preaching....quite the unifier that 0bama!
The newspaper announcements would have used either data from the LFCOLB or from the 'COLB application'. If I am right about there being such a form, then it could have been filled out with fake data.
But if the microfiche has actually been tampered with then that is a different order of fakery. It would point to NO contemporary COLB. It would also be prima facie evidence of fraud.
Exactly!! Whatever reason he has to hide all his documentation it leaves him and therefore the US open to blackmail.
For this reason alone he should be forced to come clean.
With international intelligence sources- it would be a calculation whether having obama in office (and under their blackmail power) would be more beneficial to their interests
than ever abetting those who want to expose a shocking truth that could throw the USA into a great turmoil and political and social instability
Don’t depend on support from abroad, friend or foes
Concealment and silence may have already tainted far too many (British govt) for them to allow the truth
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.