Posted on 08/03/2009 5:14:43 PM PDT by don-o
Document from Australia
Document from Kenya
I saw the same thing.
Number of folds is wrong.
ping
>>> You sure dont take much to convince! What if the other one is a hoax?
Lavender doesn’t even sound Kenyan... the newspaper...
the apparent ease of photo-shopping multiple versions...
the whole flap with the attack site...
My interest might be restored with REAL news on the progression of the motion to validate.
The fact that Hawaii refused to validate their own COLB is bigger news to me right now.
Color is wrong as well. But, the format is identical and they got sloppy in not changing Mr. Lavender’s name and the Book number and page number.
I am not saying that it is real or not. I am saying that Dr. Ortiz might have more information than she is releasing. Furthermore I would expect disinformation to come out if it was real. Lavender could very well be an English name or that of a Kenyan with English heritage. I’m just saying PATIENCE. It is either real or it isn’t. There is no need to jump to either conclusion.
As Moe used to say, "One of us is crazy, and it can't be you!"
I have found myself asking 'Whom has the most to gain from putting forth the Orly exhibit if it is a forgery, and whom has the most to gain by bringing forth teh new exhibit if it is a forgery? Then, would Obam benefit from bringing forth a pretty good forgery directing interested parties to keep looking in Kenya for documentation of his supposed birth there?
Of course it’s a forgery. Only a moron would latch on to this crap.
G.F. could have been the father of E.F . Maybe he retired and his son took over his job ?
In the same vein, here is a birth certificate from Kapiolani Hospital in Honolulu from someone born one day after Obamas’ date of birth:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105365
The birth certificate of Obama, if it exists, should be identical in form and appearance to the one illustrated in the above link. Real typewriters were used in those days with identifiable letter characteristics unique to each typewriter, as with fingerprints.
Some have speculated that Obama never had a real birth certificate from Kapiolani Hospital, and, that he actually filed, legally, under Hawaiian law for a certificate in 2006 or 7 using only the single newspaper announcement from 1961 related to his birth at Kapiolani Hospital. Interestingly, a second Honolulu hospital is recorded in another birth announcement for Obama. So, there are two Honolulu hospitals that have newspaper notices referring to Obamas’ birth.
My bad - we’re talking Australia and Kenya . I’m losing it !
Agreed.
I have no problem with us thinking through a problem and working it out...even when the results aren’t what we might have hoped. But when we find the answer, we need to embrace the truth and walk away.
Obama is hiding something and his minions are setting up all kinds of traps and road blocks for us to fall into. This is just another of their misdirections and does not in anyway change the fact that Obama is hiding something big about himself.
It is our duty to find out exactly what it is, regardless of how tough it might be to do so.
>>> Im just saying PATIENCE.
Thats all I have left.
All we have is a photo of a copy, and an unknown plaintiff.
I thought I saw in an earlier thread that Keyes was involved in this.... Is he giving any info on it at his site?
And District Registrar Miller?
The Australian copy is clearly a fake. The number “2” in the “No.” field at the top would indicate there was only 1 prior copy issued that year in the district.
Thanks. Hmmmm....
Do we know that that's what "No." refers to or are we just assuming it?
....of course its a forgery...
Finally, a voice of reason instead of people tying themselves in knots trying to prove this crapola is real.
Thanks to FreepShop1
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.