[Adammon]

You’re seeing what you want to see, not what’s actually there. There is a different in resolution between the two documents; you’re seeing JPEG artifacting that’s making it appear that the characters are different. They are not. The “obvious” K is easily readable as an E if one just takes the time to not TRY to see a K. The 0 still resembles an 0 even at high resolution - there’s a very obvious JPG artifact obscuring the top right of the 0 which is making people believe it to be a 6. They’re both pictures of the same document.

All fuddle-duddle over nothing.

[pissant]

No, they aren’t. I see it plainly with my bare eye. I see it even clearer when I download and zoom

[outlawjake]

yea.. i think the lower resolution and the font type of the E..makes it look like a k

[ScreamingFist]

You’re seeing what you want to see, not what’s actually there.

With all due respect sir, the E is darker and plainly obvious.....

[Swordmaker]

You’re seeing what you want to see, not what’s actually there. There is a different in resolution between the two documents; you’re seeing JPEG artifacting that’s making it appear that the characters are different. They are not. The “obvious” K is easily readable as an E if one just takes the time to not TRY to see a K. The 0 still resembles an 0 even at high resolution - there’s a very obvious JPG artifact obscuring the top right of the 0 which is making people believe it to be a 6. They’re both pictures of the same document.

All fuddle-duddle over nothing.

Absolutely. I created that first image... it's an "E" and any "K" that is being seen is an artifact of converting a large PNG file to a small JPEG file.