Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: motoman
alleged fake version with the 47044 document number

That is the real version from her website

I'm confused now as to what Orly had even originally posted. Was it the version with the 47644 doc number?

No she posted 47O44. Then someone quickly screen captured it sunday morning and posted it here. It was a poor version with jpg artifacts that made the O look like a 6.

or, did her adversaries take her original, modify it to look fake, and then spread it all over the internet to discredit her?

No the adversaries are not involved with the O to S problem, that was created innocently here. The adversaries are creating other forgeries like the Aussie one to muddy the waters.

1,760 posted on 08/04/2009 9:42:22 AM PDT by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1749 | View Replies ]


To: palmer

Your comments seem to be just the opposite of the explanation provided from http://usurpador.blogcindario.com/

See excerpt below:

“According to the free republic, some obama-loving hackers were able to hack Mrs. Orly Taitz website and modify the original document. They also hacked her main blog, located at the following address:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ – Do not go there as your computer could get infected.

In any event – people pointed out error’s in the birth document. Here were two of the main arguments:

1.) E.F. Lavender was the supposed signature of the district registrar on this birth document. It turns out that E.F. Lavender is a laundry detergent.

Answer: The original document says K.F. Lavender, NOT E.F. lavender. To view the original document in enlarged format, click here.

2.) The birth certificate # is 47,044 – representing Obama’s age(47), the number 0 = O, as in obama, and 44 would represent the fact that he is the ‘44th’ president.

Answer:This was planted and it is obvious by the 0 in the modified/hacked version. The real number, when examined closely and carefully on the original version – is actually 47,644.

Again, click here to see the enlarged version.

If you are unable to make out the details, I took the image with photoshop. I decreased the brightness, but enhanced the contrast features of the photograph. The purpose of this was to see the font better.
Check that version out here.”


1,763 posted on 08/04/2009 9:47:02 AM PDT by motoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1760 | View Replies ]

To: palmer

If there are obvious forgeries going on here, and many people got screen captures of them, how do you know there wasn’t multiple versions? Why are you so insistant of what we all have?


1,767 posted on 08/04/2009 9:51:26 AM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1760 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson