Your comments seem to be just the opposite of the explanation provided from http://usurpador.blogcindario.com/
See excerpt below:
“According to the free republic, some obama-loving hackers were able to hack Mrs. Orly Taitz website and modify the original document. They also hacked her main blog, located at the following address:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ – Do not go there as your computer could get infected.
In any event – people pointed out error’s in the birth document. Here were two of the main arguments:
1.) E.F. Lavender was the supposed signature of the district registrar on this birth document. It turns out that E.F. Lavender is a laundry detergent.
Answer: The original document says K.F. Lavender, NOT E.F. lavender. To view the original document in enlarged format, click here.
2.) The birth certificate # is 47,044 – representing Obama’s age(47), the number 0 = O, as in obama, and 44 would represent the fact that he is the ‘44th’ president.
Answer:This was planted and it is obvious by the 0 in the modified/hacked version. The real number, when examined closely and carefully on the original version – is actually 47,644.
Again, click here to see the enlarged version.
If you are unable to make out the details, I took the image with photoshop. I decreased the brightness, but enhanced the contrast features of the photograph. The purpose of this was to see the font better.
Check that version out here.”
Again the one labelled “original” is a poor quality image that someone saved Sunday morning in a rush job. If you want to believe otherwise, you would also have to believe that someone infiltrated the website where the courthouse stores their image (share.acrobat.com). That is much less plausible than a jpg artifact (which are plentiful on the image labelled “original”).
No, Motoman, "Lavender" is a make of laundry detergent. The name itself means "launderer" in the languages it is derived from. The EF or KF are irrelevant to the argument about the "laundry detergent" which is a red herring anyway. There are people today living in Kenya with the surname Lavender. Just as there are in Great Britain and the USA.
Answer: The original document says K.F. Lavender, NOT E.F. lavender. To view the original document in enlarged format, click here.
No, it doesn't. For the Umpteenth time, the K is an artifact of the JPEG process to compress the file. Orly's court filing speak of E.F. Lavender, her website requests help from people in locating said E.F. Lavender, and the file of the BC proxy submitted to the court, before the thread ever started on FR, says E.F. Lavender. There NEVER was a "K" except in the illusion created by JPEGing the PNG file I captured from Orly's site... and that PNG file clearly shows an "E."
If you are unable to make out the details, I took the image with photoshop. I decreased the brightness, but enhanced the contrast features of the photograph. The purpose of this was to see the font better.
It matters not, Motoman. You are working with the JPEGed file... and you can't put back details that were removed when it was made into a JPEG. Garbage in results in Garbage Out. GIGO.