The owner of the birth certificate says it was real. ::shrugs:: Don’t know.
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2646009.htm
Adelaide man caught up in bid to oust Obama
Listen to that interview more carefully. The old chap didn't have his original copy to compare and was merely comparing general facts about himself with those on the web image. He didn't compare the incriminating details (document numbers & clerk names) which were inserted by the forgers into the image of his BC.
I’m sure the guy had a Birth Certificate, but the latest one we see is definitely a forgery. They took the bits out of his real one and put them in the DU issued template.
Easy way to tell. The “District” printed in real documents unrealistically overlays the signature in the forged Australian.
By the way. Someone with access to the family tree website must have been party to it, cos they had to change the original jpg to the new forged one.
I think that what he is saying is that it has HIS personal data on it. To him, that makes it "real." It matches what he knows about himself and his parents.
But I bet he doesn't know who signed his certified copy... or who registered his birth. Unless he is comparing his actual copy with the one that is now on the internet, in detail, he can't certify that the one that is currently on his family's geneology website is what he placed there.