[SeattleBruce]

That’s pretty lacking is specifics, Bruce. e.g. was “Republic Of Kenya” used on a BC at that time? That would settle one major point of debate.
++++++++

Please see my post #809; thanks to politicalmerc.
*************

Also the use of the term “appear to be” leaves a bit of wiggle room in case it’s a fake. If WND would post images of it’s comparsion BCs (or whatever docs it’s using) with the private info blacked out, that would certainly be helpful.
++++++++

I’m hoping they’ll do that. It may also shed light on the numerology concerns people are having..

[LouieFisk]

SeattleBruce - Please see my post #809; thanks to politicalmerc. *************

You mean "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA, 1963" reference? That's interesting, but it's somewhat of an apples/oranges thing since it's not a birth certificate. I have in mind something that would fly in court - for example, that it was the standard or common for BCs for the time this one is credited to.

I’m hoping they’ll do that. It may also shed light on the numerology concerns people are having.

I imagine that WND will either have to provide something tangible by way of collaborating contemporary evidence or they'll start walking back on this story. Many of the questions raised here could be answered one way or another - the birth number, Republic Of Kenya - would seem to be pretty easily beaten down with comparative records. I'd think WND must be aware of the basic objections.