To: Eye of Unk
This is the one I copied this morning from the same address. It has a torn out piece on the top, deckled edges and isn't bright white. The new one has obviously been copied and retouched. Why go to all the bother to clean it up?
478 posted on
08/02/2009 8:51:51 PM PDT by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: skr
Interesting that your copy here has a rip in it....the one I have seen doesn’t.
482 posted on
08/02/2009 8:55:40 PM PDT by
tuckrdout
("Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it." - Thomas Jefferson)
To: skr; Salamander
This was an attempt by a FReeper to make the document more readable with Photoshop. It is nothing more than a manipulation of the other picture on the red tablecloth.
484 posted on
08/02/2009 8:57:55 PM PDT by
perfect_rovian_storm
(The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
To: skr
Delete the copy with the black background. Salamander made that copy for another user on the main thread to make it easier to read. It is not ripped, he admittedly just isn’t very good with photoshop. There is nothing to this picture.
490 posted on
08/02/2009 9:00:12 PM PDT by
Tedro
To: skr
Nothing nefarious. Probably to brighten and make it easier to read, send, or fax so as not to cause damage to the original document. I would sure like to have a REAL forensic analysis of the paper and whatever old prints might be on this thing. It is a copy of he same document. The one you just posted is even more startling. It does look as though someone had this put away for a very, very long time.
I posted on an older thread a long time ago that whoever had this thing would release it if obama got too far out of line or lost his usefulness.
The other day, I said he had missed an important deadline.
My money is still on bill clinton. If that sounds crazy, so be it.
501 posted on
08/02/2009 9:10:17 PM PDT by
MestaMachine
(OREO, Milk's favorite cookie. At least that's what my TV said.)
To: skr
They didn’t really clean it up. They just made a photo copy of it.
To: skr
Now that does look more like I would expect from an original.
To: skr
This is the one I copied this morning from the same address. It has a torn out piece on the top, deckled edges and isn't bright white. The new one has obviously been copied and retouched. Why go to all the bother to clean it up?
Has salamander responded to you? This version is one he made from the original with the fabric background. The notch in the upper right fold was an artifact of his selection sensitivity level. It's otherwise exactly the same as the other one.
568 posted on
08/02/2009 10:15:03 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: skr
OH lord, that was done by a Freeper when the story first broke to help makes the document clearer. It was admitted and apologized for at the full thread for the topic.
592 posted on
08/02/2009 11:04:18 PM PDT by
Brytani
(DC Freeper Convention and National Tea Party - FreepMail Me for rooms and convention info!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson