Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawaii "Certification of Live Birth" - Date Accepted vs. Date Filed (Some clues)
DecaLogos ^ | February 8, 2009 | Mike C (Comment Section)

Posted on 07/30/2009 6:25:00 PM PDT by trueamerica

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-247 next last

1 posted on 07/30/2009 6:25:01 PM PDT by trueamerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: trueamerica

Ping. This information could be very important.


2 posted on 07/30/2009 6:28:54 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trueamerica

Interesting catch! Too many questions about this matter, it won’t be long before HolyO will HAVE to answer questions, and not in a mocking manner!! This story is spreading like wildfire, and going viral, that’s for sure!


3 posted on 07/30/2009 6:32:31 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trueamerica
bttt!

That is interesting. Not enought information about him then either, starting to see a pattern here...

4 posted on 07/30/2009 6:33:04 PM PDT by 1ofmanyfree ((No jobs, licenses,mortgages,bank accounts or amnesty for any illegal alien criminals ! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trueamerica

tag


5 posted on 07/30/2009 6:35:01 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

ping


6 posted on 07/30/2009 6:39:34 PM PDT by MrDem (From Morning in America to Mourning in America...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trueamerica

It would be helpful if someone would post side-by-side images of the DeCosta COLB and the Obama COLB to illustrate what is being claimed here.


7 posted on 07/30/2009 6:40:02 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trueamerica

Was discussed quite a bit last year. Good to bring it back up again. Axelrod is on a flop sweat now.


8 posted on 07/30/2009 6:42:05 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Ping

Lost my ping list!


9 posted on 07/30/2009 6:42:48 PM PDT by jcsjcm (Upholding the Constitution til my last breath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

10 posted on 07/30/2009 6:45:12 PM PDT by MrDem (From Morning in America to Mourning in America...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trueamerica

Right across the bottom of the COLB, it says:

ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE


11 posted on 07/30/2009 6:50:13 PM PDT by Former MSM Viewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trueamerica

ping


12 posted on 07/30/2009 6:52:45 PM PDT by w4women
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1ofmanyfree

“...starting to see a pattern here...”

.
The most important pattern that should be observed and remembered is that no congress critter is willing to stand up and deliver to shine some light on this matter.


13 posted on 07/30/2009 6:52:54 PM PDT by 353FMG (Death is Life without Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MrDem

A question about DeCosta. The line “date accepted by state registrar”. The date is 1930. That is 29 years before Hawaii attained statehood. There would have been a territorial registar, but not a state registrar. Or does the computer program that produces these COLBs not differentiate pre and post statehood dates? Just asking and am open to explanations.


14 posted on 07/30/2009 6:54:07 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MrDem

First COLB has an entry that states: ‘DATE ACCEPTED BY REGISTRAR’.

Second COLB states: ‘DATE ACCEPTED BY STATE REGISTRAR’


15 posted on 07/30/2009 6:58:22 PM PDT by 353FMG (Death is Life without Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: trueamerica

Ping.


16 posted on 07/30/2009 6:59:07 PM PDT by jazminerose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trueamerica

This discrepancy, along with the other missing records, make it appear that Obama is definitely hiding something that he doesn’t want the American people to find out. Obama is losing the faith of the American People and the foreign governments as well because of his deception on his origins. He will always be suspect until he levels with the people. He sounds and acts like a habitual liar.


17 posted on 07/30/2009 7:02:01 PM PDT by ArtyFO (I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire at the moonbat loonery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Ping!


18 posted on 07/30/2009 7:03:10 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MrDem

Here is the long-form birth certificate of one of the Nordyke twins. The Nordyke example is important, because if Obama was born around the same date in the same hospital (Kapiolani), Obama's long-form birth certificate should look just like the Nordyke certificate.

Looking at the fields on the Nordyke birth certificate, both fields 20 and 22 refer to "accepted."

The Nordyke-style basis for birth registration seems consistent with the Decosta short-form birth certificate, in that the operative word is "accepted."

The different word "filed" in Obama's may be indicative that a document other than a hospital-generated certificate of live birth was the basis of the birth registration, such as an affidavit of birth filed by a family member.

What would be useful would be to see what a short-form COLB based on the Nordyke original birth certificate would look like - would it use "accepted" or "filed?"

Not enough information to reach any conclusion on this.

19 posted on 07/30/2009 7:07:24 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
A question about DeCosta. The line “date accepted by state registrar”. The date is 1930. That is 29 years before Hawaii attained statehood. There would have been a territorial registar, but not a state registrar. Or does the computer program that produces these COLBs not differentiate pre and post statehood dates? Just asking and am open to explanations.

Very good question. NOT a state in 1930. What is going on?

20 posted on 07/30/2009 7:11:00 PM PDT by mc5cents (Never apologize for our country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson