“You are a whole citizen under the jurisdiction of the United States only, upon birth or you are not”
At birth, you don’t have an opinion as to whether you are a citizen.
The fact is, AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH, the marriage in Hawaii was VOID AB INITIO.
You seem to be saying that his status at birth was later changed because he THOUGHT he had UK citizenship when , in fact, he did not. (Of course this is based on the Hawaiian marriage- doesn’t take into account being born in Kenya or a marriage in Kenya)
It doesn’t jive with the first sentence.
But think what you will and ignore what you will.
I wouldn’t want an attorney to represent me that didn’t consider and plan for the possibilities.
Could you do me a favor and go back through my posts? I don’t recall posting anything regarding Barry’s opinion.
I didn’t imply such and don’t see how you infered as much.(hey, I made rhyme).
And get over the whole “marriage was Void” issue. I didn’t bring it up but went with your position that the marriage was not recognized.
However, father hood is recognized, just as motherhood is recognized.
Skip the jive talk too. You are the only one discussing someones thought or thought process and I don’t see how made the leap.
What considerations and plans of possibilities would you want an attorney to consider?