Could you do me a favor and go back through my posts? I don’t recall posting anything regarding Barry’s opinion.
I didn’t imply such and don’t see how you infered as much.(hey, I made rhyme).
And get over the whole “marriage was Void” issue. I didn’t bring it up but went with your position that the marriage was not recognized.
However, father hood is recognized, just as motherhood is recognized.
Skip the jive talk too. You are the only one discussing someones thought or thought process and I don’t see how made the leap.
What considerations and plans of possibilities would you want an attorney to consider?
“The fact is Barry admits to a dual citizenship and that makes his “jurisdiction” at the time of birth divided. How you can see it any other way, I can’t figure out. “
It doesn’t. I explained why. Void Ab Initio doesn’t have anything to do with his opinion about his citizenship. He has no opinion at birth. Citizenship could not be conferred and just because he thinks it is so does not make it so.
My position is ...and I would tell this to anyone that is roped into a lawsuit under the assurance that Barry was a UK citizen...that there could be grounds for malpractice if the lawyer fails to disclose this information. The lawyer better find a piece of the law that would make Barry a UK citizen. It may be out there. But most of you are refusing to acknowledge this is an issue and not looking for something that would help them in their case.
A person is putting their life and their career and the well being of their family on the line if they file a lawsuit against Obama. To have a lawyer scoff at this idea and totally disregard it is inexcusable.
The same goes for refusing to disclose the out of wedlock provision of citizenship requirements if born in Kenya. They better have some law to back them up that the out of wedlock provision doesn’t apply to a marriage that is Void Ab Initio.
This is a significant issue.