|
Lady D:
Thanks so much for sending me these.
Boy, I wish I had known last year that you had this. It's a 2007 COLB, and I was scouring the countryside looking for another one like it.
I've attached a copy of the only 2007 COLB I had prior to getting yours.
Now, what I'd really would appreciate is if you can make me another set of scans, but this time, with higher output levels, sort of like the one I attached.
The first set is a bit underexposed to make out all the detail.
If you are using the the HP software (PrecisionScan Pro, I think it's called), or even just the driver, I believe that there is a setting for output level or exposure control on the output menu.
I used to use an HP6250cxi and I recall that either a Settings or Options selection is on the top menu. I stopped using it because the software does not run under Vista.
Seeing your COLB is like really great news and not so great news.
It's really great news because it's a real 2007 COLB made during the same year that Obama's bogus COLB was allegedly made.
It's not so good news because it confirmed one of my fears -- that the DOH used both the larger and smaller Seal designs in the same year. If you ever saw that Seal comparison made by XXXXXXXXX, then you'll know what I mean.
I went out on a limb last year by stating that the DOH only used the larger Seal, and when I saw the smaller Seal in the Factcheck photos, I thought that was a red flag. It's a false alarm, but no matter because the object that Factcheck photographed is a fabricated document.
Thanks ever so much,
XXXXXXXXX
From: Lady D <XXXXXXXXXXXXX>
Subject: polarik@XXXXXXXXXXXX
To: polarik@XXXXXXXXX
Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 12:41 AM
Hey Pol,
Here is the COLB, both sides. They were scanned by me just now with an HP C4200 Printer Scanner on Custom Settings of 600 DPI all other color settings at default.
Again I wish to stress that I do not want to see my personal information on the internet. The reason I am sending this to you is because the Department of Heath in Hawaii just confirmed to me by phone that this document was indeed requested in Feb of 2000, they have a computer record of it. and it shows that my Mom requested it. If MY colb could have a MISTAKEN date like this, because its supposed to be for the date of the PRINTING, then it is conceivable that it could be changed to ANY date the person printing out could want.
I hope this helps.
XXXXXXXXXX
|
