Posted on 07/21/2009 1:50:48 AM PDT by neverdem
NEW ORLEANS — One in six elderly patients who visit an emergency department receives a potentially inappropriate medication, according to a national study.
That adds up to an estimated 2.7 million geriatric patients each year who get one or more medications with unfavorable risk-benefit ratios because of age-related changes in pharmacodynamics, according to Dr. William J. Meurer, who spoke at the annual meeting of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
If the geriatric individual was prescribed two or more medications during their time in the emergency department, the odds that at least one of them would be potentially inappropriate jumped sevenfold, compared with the odds among recipients of a single medication, according to Dr. Meurer of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, another strong predictor of receiving a potentially inappropriate medication was geographic location: Elderly patients who visited an emergency department in any part of the country other than the Northeast were at twofold greater risk.
The other significant predictors were being a woman, which was associated with a 1.49-fold increased risk; being age 65-74 years, with a 1.48-fold greater risk than in patients aged 75 years and up; and being seen only by an attending emergency physician without resident involvement, which conferred a 1.19-fold increased risk.
He presented an analysis of National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for the years 2000-2006. The data set provided a weighted estimate encompassing 116 million ED visits by elderly individuals who were ultimately discharged home.
About 80% of the emergency department visits entailed no resident involvement.
At least one drug on the updated Beers Criteria of potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly was prescribed in 16.8% of visits (Arch. Intern. Med. 2003;163: 2716-24). The absolute risk was 1% lower in 2005-2006 than in 2000-2004, a significant difference because of the large numbers involved.
The study was funded by the National Institute on Aging.
Dr. Meurer reported no financial conflicts of interest.
I am sure government health care will fix it. sarc
T. Package RN
Potentially inappropriate drugs are, by definition, also potentially appropriate. This story is beyond pointless.
The authors forgot Oxygen. Risk of suppressing the drive to breathe in COPD’ers. Boy - that ought to be way up there. (/ sarcasm)
Phenergan, that is what they tried to give my MIL the last time we had her at the emergency room. She was dehydrated and all we needed was an IV and they wanted to give her that and Dramamine. I swear the Dr. was mad because we wouldn’t let him give her any medication.
If your MIL wasn’t vomiting and was dehydrated why did she “need an IV”. All she needed to do was drink some water or gatoraid.
Thank you very much!
(...and what's that about an unsafe drop in blood pressure anyway? All the blood rushes to your...head? /sarc>)
Cheers!
Did Dr. Meurer examine these patients? Did he formulate a treatment plan, taking into account all of the relevant variables?
Or does he just have his head up his ass?
And, he reported no financial conflicts of interest. None, that is, except the fact that his paymasters are looking for a specific conclusion, which his "research" just happened to provide.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.