John Avlon.....................................Shepard Smith.
Posted on 07/20/2009 1:06:50 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
One hundred seventy soldiers may be on the verge of refusing to serve—because their president might not be a natural-born citizen. Welcome to the world of the Birthers, right-wing conspiracy theorists whose anti-Obama movement is spreading to Congress.
Last week, a U.S. Army major named Stefan Frederick Cook made news when he refused deployment to Afghanistan on the grounds that President Barack Obama might not be a natural-born citizen and therefore is constitutionally ineligible to give orders as commander in chief. Now Cook’s lawyer says she has 170 more soldiers willing to file similar protests against the president.
Welcome to the world of the “Birthers”—right-wing conspiracy theorists committed to undoing the 2008 presidential election by trying to prove that Barack Obama was not born in the United States. The movement is evidence that Obama Derangement Syndrome is going viral from the far right, proliferating beyond fringe-festival Internet sites. It’s in danger of a quiet mainstreaming along partisan lines—reaching into talk radio, cable news, the armed services, and even the halls of Congress.
The 170 number thrown out by Cook’s lawyer has the feel of Joe McCarthy’s claim that he had a list of 205 communists working in Harry Truman’s State Department—i.e. pseudo-specific, intentionally inflammatory, and ultimately bogus. But what’s not in question is the nine Republican congressmen who have co-sponsored a bill that, in response to this much-debunked conspiracy theory, would require presidential campaigns to provide “a copy of the candidate’s birth certificate.”
Asked whether Obama “is a U.S. citizen,” bill co-sponsor Randy Neugebauer, a Texas Republican, replied: “I don’t know. I’ve never seen him produce documents that would say one way or another.”
Major Cook—a distinguished combat veteran—appears to have been a willing pawn in the Birthers’ efforts to bring attention to their cause. He re-enlisted as a reservist in May, with the apparent intention of carrying out this political performance-art litigation. When the military shrugged and said he didn’t have to go to AfPak (issuing a statement saying, "This in no way validates any of the outlandish claims made by Major Cook") and a judge threw out the case, Cook’s legal team celebrated it as a smoking-gun victory. WorldNetDaily—whose editor and CEO has been a major supporter of Birther petition efforts and roadside billboards—trumpeted it as “Bombshell: Orders Revoked for Soldier Challenging Prez.”
In the wake of this “success,” Cook’s lawyer, Dr. Orly Taitz, and her frequent plaintiff, Ambassador Alan Keyes, appeared on CNN to debate the issue. I’d hit the Birthers in my “Wingnut Watch” segment on the Campbell Brown show earlier in the week and was asked to counter their claims alongside New York Daily News columnist Errol Louis.
Before going on air, Keyes had his eyes closed as if in prayer while Taitz was jumpy and pie-eyed, like a patient off her meds. Anchor Kitty Pilgrim then went through a thorough 3-1/2 minute dismantling of the Birther arguments, including the long-ago issuance of Obama’s August 1961 certificate of live birth, its validation by Hawaii’s Republican Gov. Linda Lingle, and two birth announcements published in Honolulu papers. (Both FactCheck.org and Snopes have published detailed investigations and refutations of the non-scandal.)
Asked what more he needed to be convinced, Keyes’ response was an instant classic in the clueless overconfidence of conspiracy theorists: “Some evidence.”
Keyes can be considered patient zero in the spread of Obama Derangement Syndrome. The one-time protégé of Reagan U.N. Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and three-time presidential candidate was recruited to run against then-state Senator Barack Obama in 2004 for the Illinois U.S. Senate seat, despite the fact that Keyes lived in Maryland. (That the GOP could not find an African-American candidate to run in all of Illinois is its own evidence in the Party of Lincoln’s fall.)
In his book Audacity of Hope, Obama recounts Keyes’ campaign claim that “Christ would not vote for Barack Obama.” The tone went downhill from there.
Keyes has only ratcheted up his rhetoric since then, both in his 2008 third-party campaign for the presidency and in February 2009 comments outside a Nebraska antiabortion fundraiser.
“Obama is a radical communist, and I think it is becoming clear. That is what I told people in Illinois and now everybody realizes it’s true,” Keyes told a reporter from local station KHAS-TV. “He is going to destroy this country, and we are either going to stop him or the United States of America is going to cease to exist.”
While Keyes calls Obama a radical communist, Taitz reaches for the opposite end of the ideological spectrum, repeatedly referring to the Obama administration as the “Gestapo-SS establishment” on her blog. She extends the metaphor with an ugly call for investigation and execution: “They all should and would be tried in Nurenberg (sic) style trials for harassing, intimidating, blackmailing and terrorizing fellow citizens, for defrauding the whole country. Patriots of this country didn’t fight and defeat Nazi Germany to end up with Obamas, McCuskill (sic), Soros, Brunner and the rest of this squad.”
Keyes and Taitz are connected by their relationship to Orange County Baptist Pastor Wiley Drake, who served as Keyes’ VP nominee in 2008 and Taitz’s first plaintiff in the Birther lawsuits. If the name sounds familiar, it’s because a few months ago Drake announced that he was praying for Obama’s death after his prayers for the death of Kansas abortionist George Tiller were “answered.” He has been offering “imprecatory prayers” against “the usurper that is in the White House…B. Hussein Obama.”
It’s the “usurper” line that ties the whole deranged tale together. Since the 2008 campaign, the far right has ginned up a steady stream of Internet rumors and rhetoric that are variations on the idea that Obama is fundamentally un-American. These range from “Obama is the Antichrist” emails passed on by people, including a South Carolina mayor, to the “Obama is a Manchurian candidate” theories posited by WorldNet Daily, among others. The underlying theme is not just paranoid politics, where a center-left president is called a socialist and then communist, but also discomfort with the idea of an African-American president—especially one who emerged from obscurity so quickly that there must be a sinister conspiracy at work.
All this might be laughable, if there weren’t deadly serious hyper-partisan hatred behind it all. There is plenty to debate over the administration’s policies, but Obama Derangement Syndrome is not healthy for our democracy—it is pathological hatred of the president posing as patriotism.
********
John P. Avlon is the author of Independent Nation: How Centrists Can Change American Politics. He writes a weekly column for The Daily Beast. Previously, he served as chief speechwriter for New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and was a columnist and associate editor for The New York Sun.
“in response to this much-debunked conspiracy theory”
When did that happen?
I know I haven’t been a coma and I still haven’t seen the real vault copy.
Did I miss something?
/s
Silly, it occurred during the globull warming discussions....
“So where are all these people? Why are they remaining silent on this issue?”
The Kenyan government has silenced all the witnesses to his birth.
“is why won’t obama just release his long form birth certificate??????”
For the exact same reason I can’t release a unicorn in your yard.
Oops...always thought Orly was a man....
Kinda like assuming O really was born outside USA. Orly and most everyone associated with these lawsuits, all of which so far have been dismissed, is a certified kook. If he is declared ineligible to be Prez I will eat a bug. Better to try to defeat him in 2012 election with strong candidate.
Trevor Loudon, a great anti-Communist researcher also has a lot of info on Obama and Communist here: http://newzeal.blogspot.com/
Ohhhhh...that explains it.
What *that* is discussed, my eyes roll back into my head and I go to my “happy place” rather suffer the insult of people lying right to my face.
But its is healthy for the U.S. President to “stonewall” possibly lie and commit fraud to the American people, when he can very easily provide what the American people want to see, and help repair the doubts of the American people.
It’s comic and tragic how many stupid commentators and Democrats there are. They haven’t even bothered to understand the question, let alone understand the answers.
The CNN Gal spent 75% of the time giving her analysis, and then giving the Beast idiot time to ad hominem, and then give Orly no reply.
These CNN morons are going to look so stupid when Obama goes down. They will never recover.
Yep, and Bill Richardson has literally dropped off the radar since making that statement about Obama.
That says a whole lot.
Good point. I'm sure he wrote a scathing rebuttal of the Texas Air National Guard desertion conspiracy theories that were rife on the internet. Backed up by the very evidence that Dan Rather famously used to bring Bush down. /extreme bitter sarc
John Avlon.....................................Shepard Smith.
Seems a pertinent question.
On the other hand, Senator Joseph McCarthy? Well, the Venona papers eventually showed him to be correct, didn't it. But the same MSM that vilified him so terribly has managed to ignore the facts yet again, and report the truth that McCarthy was right!
Mark
Simple, basic issue to resolve.
In the old days, the State Department certainly was riddled with moles, but for the last 2 decades at the very least, enemies of the United States been operating out in the open at Foggy Bottom!
The State Department is one of the most anti-American organizations in the US, on par with the UN. The whole rats nest should have been cleaned out when they opposed President Reagan's "Tear Down This Wall" speech!
Mark
Welcome to the Spin Cycle where seeking to verify qualifications is viewed as a conspiracy theory.
“So he’s paying him a compliment?”
Right you are! McCarthry was in fact right and as far as I’m concerned a hero of our country.
Also...during the campaign Obama supporters claimed that it was improper to smear Obama because of his associates but now it seems totally appropriate to smear Taitz and Keyes, etc. by their associates.
Gloves off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.