Larry Fag? Dong Ensign? Oral Hatch?
1 posted on
07/10/2009 11:15:54 PM PDT by
pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: pissant
WTF?
Perhaps the metrosexual “conservative” of the NYT was fantasizing?
2 posted on
07/10/2009 11:18:02 PM PDT by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: pissant
4 posted on
07/10/2009 11:19:16 PM PDT by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
To: pissant
I sat next to a Republican senator once at dinner and he had his hand on my inner thigh the whole time. He didnt get up? move ? punch the guy ? pat his hand and say no...?
5 posted on
07/10/2009 11:20:06 PM PDT by
woofie
To: pissant
Nah, probably Chris Matthews reaching around from behind.
To: pissant
7 posted on
07/10/2009 11:20:39 PM PDT by
Chet 99
To: pissant
8 posted on
07/10/2009 11:21:00 PM PDT by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: pissant; rabscuttle385
We have Republican Senators ?
10 posted on
07/10/2009 11:21:33 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: pissant
OR...he’s MAKING IT UP???
11 posted on
07/10/2009 11:22:31 PM PDT by
Hildy
To: pissant
Senator Scottish Law
12 posted on
07/10/2009 11:24:04 PM PDT by
woofie
To: pissant
Probably lying, he does work for that newspaper you know
13 posted on
07/10/2009 11:24:25 PM PDT by
GeronL
( Patriotic Insurrectionist is no longer a contradiction in terms!)
To: pissant
I sat next to a Republican senator once at dinner and he had his hand on my inner thigh the whole time. I'd bet this is a flat lie. Or maybe it's different for guys, but, speaking as a woman, if someone (man or woman) put a hand on my thigh without my invitation, he or she would be told to remove it instantly. That hand wouldn't stay there "the whole time" - it would be gone in a split second.
15 posted on
07/10/2009 11:25:54 PM PDT by
hsalaw
To: pissant
Nope not one bit of bias here..... Yet No one mentions the Banking Queen Barney Frank.....He refuses to say any name....Kind of like the old liberal trick...Sources say......
To: pissant
Oh, yeah, David Brooks is so hot. /s
In his dreams.
17 posted on
07/10/2009 11:27:00 PM PDT by
kcvl
To: pissant
"I sat next to a Republican senator once at dinner and he had his hand on my inner thigh the whole time. I was like, ehh, get me out of here."
ok, what men among the non-metrosexual crowd out there would allow a man to have his hand on his inner thigh for more than 1 second?
at the least he should have acted like a 5 year old and started screaming "i need an adult i need an adult i need an adult".
Sounds like abosolute unadulterated b.s. to me... unless Brooks wanted that hand on his thigh.
19 posted on
07/10/2009 11:28:27 PM PDT by
laxcoach
(our salvation will come from the states pushing back the feds, if it comes at all.)
To: pissant
HAAHAHAHA “Oral Hatch!”
At least the mystery glad-hander wasn’t moslem. As far as we know.
23 posted on
07/10/2009 11:30:11 PM PDT by
Islam=Murder
(The United States - surrendering to Sharia without a peep.)
To: pissant
He’s lying.
DemoL:iberals...So mentally lazy and morally warped, they even have to steal their insults and accusations.
24 posted on
07/10/2009 11:34:36 PM PDT by
DGHoodini
(The New York Times, are lying 'Rats!)
To: pissant
You know, all three of us spend a lot of time covering politicians and I dont know about you guys, but in my view, theyre all emotional freaks of one sort or another. Is he saying that a Senator is an emotional freak just because he's gay? Or that he'd have to be an emotional freak to be attracted to David Brooks?
25 posted on
07/10/2009 11:38:15 PM PDT by
AZLiberty
(Yes, Mr. Lennon, I do want a revolution.)
To: pissant
Perhaps the senator naturally assumed that all NYTimes writers are gay.
Since they are.
The fact that Brooks sat thru that event with a man’s hand on his inner thigh means HE is gay also.
Gay men forget that the things they say make it obvious they’re gay. You cannot mention you were wearing sandals and a mumu, then exclaim “But they were so UGLY!” and expect people to conclude that you’re not gay because the nuance of the outfit didn’t please you.
It sounds more like he felt “a bit pushed/rushed” than “shocked or panicked” that a man was grabbing his inner thigh.
The only man I would let grab my inner thigh is Omoslem, so I could go on FoxNews 10 seconds later screaming OMOSLEM GRABBED MY THIGH, HE’S A MOSLEM QUEEN!!!!!!!!! .....over and over until he admits he banged Larry Sinclair in that limo, and the USA renames Obama to “Ohomo,” and the world realizes that democrats elected a blazing moslem communist.
26 posted on
07/10/2009 11:41:30 PM PDT by
Islam=Murder
(The United States - surrendering to Sharia without a peep.)
To: pissant
Larry Fag? Dong Ensign? Oral Hatch? How 'bout he's lying? Since when did you believe anything the lying media had to say? ;o)
To: pissant
Brooks failed to mention where he had his hand.
29 posted on
07/10/2009 11:57:24 PM PDT by
FTJM
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson