Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin Radio Interview tonight at 8 PM EST [Youtube at #129] "I'm going to be freeer, now, to fight..
http://www.kfar660.com/pages/639282.php ^ | Stardate: 0907.10

Posted on 07/10/2009 4:57:00 PM PDT by The Wizard

I don't know if this is posted, but this is a reminder that you can listen at

http://www.kfar660.com/pages/639282.php


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: free; freeeeeeer; freeeeeer; freeeeer; freeeer; freeer; freer; palin; palin2012; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 last
To: American Dream 246

Thanks...I thought I was listening to the more recent interview. I will check out the more recent one and go from there.

Regardless, the questions and answers from the first interview are what they are, and I was not impressed. She was given 3 or 4 chances to rip global warming and cap and trade and didn’t, and she pushed for the LOST treaty, which appears to be a U.N./globalist reg.


161 posted on 07/11/2009 8:29:17 AM PDT by Yooper4Life (47% voted against him, and millions stayed home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: techno

I apparently clicked on the wrong link because I apparently heard an interview from last month or something. I will listen to the recent one and take it from there.

See my #161 response: regardless of when the interview I heard took place, her global warming/cap and trade and answers regarding the Russian/Alaskan islands were not what I expected.


162 posted on 07/11/2009 8:39:46 AM PDT by Yooper4Life (47% voted against him, and millions stayed home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: NellieMae

Grins, at this point, my dream ticket would be either Palin-Thompson, (Fred, we hardly knew ye), or Hunter, or Sessions, or.... well - you get the idea ; }

Tatt


163 posted on 07/11/2009 10:29:20 AM PDT by thesearethetimes... ("Courage, is fear that has said its prayers." DorothyBernard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Yooper4Life
Remaining off-topic by discussing the May 28 interview on a thread that is about the July 10 interview... she answered the cap and trade question very specifically as Governor of Alaska about Alaskan preparedness for a Federally imposed problem. Unlike you, I think her answer was reasonable. She was not giving a campaign speech. She was on topic for the venue. She is to be commended for doing the job she is getting paid to do at the moment instead of giving what would have been the non-answer you seem to have expected. I think you are going out of your way to criticize.
164 posted on 07/11/2009 10:43:13 AM PDT by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim; imperat animus sibi, et resistitur -- Augustini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Yooper4Life

She is inexperienced and needed more time in office to learn and grow as a leader.

Sorry, I know how much she is loved, but it seems to me that she is interested in going on a speaking circuit to cash in on her popularity. The pessimist in me says she quit before she had to do unpopular things, and became unbankable.

It is a pity, because I believe she had great promise and was the best hope the republican party had for a real leader. If she had only stayed on as Governor to learn the craft of leadership....


165 posted on 07/11/2009 10:59:16 AM PDT by tuckrdout ("Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

>PALIN / NUGENT 2012

Would a secret service detail even be necessary?<

LOL!

Love it!


166 posted on 07/11/2009 11:19:44 AM PDT by Califreak (Dissident under duress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: delacoert; techno; American Dream 246

I listened to the May 28 interview again, as well as the July 10 one. Sorry in advance for the long post but sometimes it takes that too handle an issue.

I understand what you are saying (”as Gov. of Alaska...”, etc.), and I agree that “she is to be commended...”, but what she gave WAS a non-answer, or at best was vague on the issue. The questioner was asking about the premise of cap and trade, and he specifically referenced both Alaska and the U.S. He, not me, asked for for her position on the fraud that is global warming and if or how she would deal with it. He clarified twice, and host did as well. Her answers made it sound is if she assumed that cap and trade would be a reality. She apologetically stated that she did not want to be a “defeatist” on the issue but that this is “reality” and she is being “pragmatic”.

I understand the venue and realize that she was not “campaigning”; however, the caller asked for her position, and as the first poster on this issue put it, “she seems to have no fight in her on this issue” (or something like that). In fact, she seemed like a defeatist. The host helped her out in the end which clarified some, but I’ll bet the caller felt either like he did not get a real answer, or that she was only going to work within the confines of cap and trade (which obviously is not law today), rather than try to kneecap its premises, which she can help do as a state governor. If she thinks the GW fight is a lost cause and cap and trade is a certainty then she should have said so. Or she could have said that the issue deserves an honest debate and as governor she will push for that. (Or anything along either of those lines). Doing so would have answered the question. To me this is all very clear from the question asked and banter between the parties.

What concerns me is that I don’t think GW/cap and trade should be treated as a foregone conclusion, but it will be if it is not fought against. As a state governor her voice can help and she certainly knows that. A plan to push for the increase of the natural gas supply during an assumed required transition to green technology in order to battle “the long term effects” of co2 because natural gas has a “low carbon footprint” is not what I call a fight against the global warming movement. But, perhaps I read it wrong and she will come out swinging at the core issue during the next couple months - I hope. If she does not, I will question it.

On the other hand, she was very clear about wanting to convince conservatives to sign on to the Law of Sea Treaty.

I am critical of all politicians, and if called for, I will be critical of her as a spokesperson for the conservative movement. If I am not, than I am no better than an Obamabot.


167 posted on 07/11/2009 11:39:51 PM PDT by Yooper4Life (47% voted against him, and millions stayed home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: tuckrdout

I don’t know about the “cash[ing] in” part of your post, but I agree that more growth as leader would be nice, if not necessary. I’ll admit that I don’t know her life story, but she obviously has some experience as a leader (definitely more than Zero) and it may be enough. Also, we are at a critical point in time and a strong conservative voice is needed. If she is that voice, it will turn out be great timing heading into 2010. We shall find out.


168 posted on 07/11/2009 11:53:02 PM PDT by Yooper4Life (47% voted against him, and millions stayed home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Sarah is going to get her book out, go on tour, give speeches and promote conservatie principles all over this country in the midst of the Obama administration disaster and gain great political capital in the process. Then she will support conservative candidates in 2010 and help them win, amassing much more political capital. She will then take all of that and make an awesome, stunning run for the Presidency in 2012.

My tagline concurs.

169 posted on 07/12/2009 7:46:13 AM PDT by torchthemummy (Sarah Palin: Conservative Point Guard-2009/10 Conservative Captain-2011/12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thesearethetimes...

Yeah, I was really disappointed that Fred dropped out so soon in the election cycle. It was like he just gave up without even giving himself a chance.


170 posted on 07/13/2009 7:32:30 PM PDT by NellieMae (Here...... common sense,common sense,common sense,where'd ya go... common sense......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson