Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHASE bank refuses to honor checks written on its bank
Examiner.com ^ | 7-9-2009 | Dianna Cotter

Posted on 07/09/2009 10:01:30 AM PDT by Danae

A funny thing happened at the bank on Wednesday (June 8th). CHASE bank in Newberg Oregon refused to honor two corporate checks totaling over 6 thousand dollars. Despite the fact that the funds were available from the account holder in question, CHASE refused to honor the checks and cash them. Upon demanding that Chase honor the checks written on its bank, I was told that if I wanted the funds, that I would have to open a business account with them in which case they would hold the checks until they cleared the account they were written on, in the same bank, which “would not happen immediately”.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: banking; chase; failure; jpmorganco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last
This is NOT good, Banks not honoring Business to business checks? This is NOT good! Not at all!
1 posted on 07/09/2009 10:01:30 AM PDT by Danae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Danae

They’re probably just out of money.


2 posted on 07/09/2009 10:03:09 AM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

All of the banks are just sitting on stacks of cash laughing their asses off.


3 posted on 07/09/2009 10:03:41 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Sue them!


4 posted on 07/09/2009 10:03:47 AM PDT by taxtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

They must be waiting for the 2nd stimulation to come from DC.


5 posted on 07/09/2009 10:04:23 AM PDT by sniper63 (Silent and stealthy - one shot - one kill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

New Jersey just arrested a bunch of gang members for a corporate check forging scheme. They paid people getting legitimate paychecks to lend them the checks so they could forge them, and then they wrote counterfeit checks for about 800k, IIRC.


6 posted on 07/09/2009 10:04:47 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user

They’re probably just out of money.

Or their latest TARP check isn’t being cashed by the Fed.


7 posted on 07/09/2009 10:04:55 AM PDT by skully (I'm an enemy of the planet!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: taxtruth

LOL Yea, I will get right on that. Think any lawyer will take that on for free? I am a student and husband is unemployed.


8 posted on 07/09/2009 10:05:08 AM PDT by Danae (Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Danae

I think that legally, they must honor the check (you know how it is with a “demand” account) or suspend business, provided the presenter has adequate identification and the account has sufficient funds. Take it to a different branch.


9 posted on 07/09/2009 10:05:21 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (AGWT is very robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it at the 100% confidence level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

No, this is not good at all.

I have an account with Aetna, I better cash it out.


10 posted on 07/09/2009 10:05:45 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

...apparently they just wanted a business account rather than a personal one.


11 posted on 07/09/2009 10:06:50 AM PDT by yoe (Pay attention to what Obama does NOT what he says.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae
I've never been too happy with Case.
Too much East Coast superiority is built into the company.
12 posted on 07/09/2009 10:07:01 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Offhand I can’t think of any bank more deserving of a bank run. Here’s to you, Chase.


13 posted on 07/09/2009 10:07:21 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Chase charged me $5 to cash a $140 reimbursement check from my mother, who has her account at Chase and had the money.

I don’t have an account there and never will.


14 posted on 07/09/2009 10:07:37 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (The UN has never won a war, nor a conflict, but liberals want it to rule all militaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Danae

This is nothing new. It’s a policy that a lot of banks have of *not cashing* business to business checks.

What you’re supposed to do is deposit the business to business check and then write a check out to yourself, on your business account and cash that.

It’s been that way for as long as I can remember...


16 posted on 07/09/2009 10:08:59 AM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Banks are under Big Brother’s eye when it comes to cashing checks written to a business. It scares the devil out of them, because Big Brother, aka the devil, wants his due!

I had a situation where a client of mine appreciated some gratis work I did for him so much that he sent me a few hundred bucks even though I never billed him for it. I tried to cash the check rather than deposit, and my own bank wouldn’t do it. They said that not too long ago it wouldn’t have been a big deal, but that the government is breathing down their backs to not allow any business money escape detection.


17 posted on 07/09/2009 10:09:22 AM PDT by MarineBrat (The New York Times is a Communist Kamikaze.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

I would bet it’s something to do with the amount of the checks. His past check was $2000. These totalled $12,000. The banks probably have secret government-imposed reporting issues and procedures when amounts go over $10,000. Not agreeing with it, just pointing out that is probably what it’s about and why the banks did not give a good explanation as to WHY they couldn’t do it.


18 posted on 07/09/2009 10:09:42 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

As I recall, to get a check cashed immediately, one has to do so at the same branch the check was written on.


19 posted on 07/09/2009 10:10:16 AM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Your state has a Banking Commission. (They all do.) It’s time to call that office and request an investigation. The bank is in pretty clear violation of the UCC as I understand it. (I do not play a lawyer on TV, or in real life; but I do have a small company.)

The Banking Commission can work wonders.


20 posted on 07/09/2009 10:10:48 AM PDT by William of Barsoom (Grace under pressure will win the day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson