Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The heart of a lion.
Real Clear Politics ^ | July 9, 2009 | David Warren

Posted on 07/09/2009 5:56:23 AM PDT by militanttoby

End of article ....

The word "populist" could mean many things, both good and bad. To my mind, Palin currently has both good and bad populist qualities. But these include the very best quality: a real, visceral identification, amounting to love, for the people who actually do America's work, take America's risks, raise America's children, and believe in God. These people are held in contempt by the progressive elites -- they are tax fodder -- just as Palin is held in contempt, as "Caribou Barbie."

Quite frankly, she has scores to settle, and on behalf of all those people. That is what got her into politics to begin with, at the PTA level, and that is what will animate the woman on the national stage. She has the heart of a lion, and she will not run away.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 07/09/2009 5:56:23 AM PDT by militanttoby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: militanttoby

bttt


2 posted on 07/09/2009 5:58:09 AM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: militanttoby

“Winners never quit, quitters never win!”—Vince Lombardi


3 posted on 07/09/2009 6:00:13 AM PDT by meandog (Doh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

“Americans traditionally love to fight. All real Americans love the sting of battle”.-Patton


4 posted on 07/09/2009 6:19:52 AM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: militanttoby
Just as when a father 'gives away' his daughter in marriage, in truth he's not losing a daughter, rather he's gaining a son-in-law.

We're not losing Sarah as Governor of Alaska; we're gaining a powerful Reaganite Conservative with the dessicant drawing power and the steel spine needed to thrive on the National Stage as the New Face of the GOP.

She can, and will, tear Zer0bama a "new one" without coming across as racist or finger-pointy, because she's already accomplished (in Alaska) exactly the kind of "Speaking Truth To Power" house-cleaning that is so desperately needed in Washington D.C. Most notably, she did it in a mere two-and-a half years.

Nothing short of amazing. Bring it home, Sarah.

;-/

5 posted on 07/09/2009 6:21:04 AM PDT by Gargantua ("Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people..." John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: militanttoby

Elitism is the belief that you, or some person or persons, has sufficient moral and intellectual ability to substitute their goals and decisions for the goals and decisions of the individual.

That’s what this fight is about. Individualism vs Elitism.

It doesn’t matter one bit what letter is behind your name, R or D.


6 posted on 07/09/2009 6:22:34 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Le Chien Rouge; meandog; militanttoby
“Winners never quit, quitters never win!”—Vince Lombardi
“Americans traditionally love to fight. All real Americans love the sting of battle”.-Patton

Patton and Lombardi were great at what they did, but would've sucked at running for public office.

7 posted on 07/09/2009 6:24:09 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: militanttoby
I think the last time something like this happened the result was Andrew Jackson's presidency. A popular politician, hated by the elite power structure, but with the support of the "common people". I think this is why both the Dems AND the 'Pubbies are attacking her so vigorously.

It begins to look to me like "deja vu all over again".

8 posted on 07/09/2009 6:31:36 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

BTTT


9 posted on 07/09/2009 6:42:02 AM PDT by condi2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: militanttoby

Good article. I think the book is not closed on Sarah Palin. A personality like that just doesn’t disappear.


10 posted on 07/09/2009 6:46:30 AM PDT by Crolis (Kill your television!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: militanttoby; novemberslady; meandog; Le Chien Rouge; Gargantua; MrB; sam_paine; Wonder Warthog; ...
I just found this disturbing chart.

There's as many lefties who hate her as us who hated Shillary.

Perhaps Palin needs to take her star power and be a kingmaker. Get a daytime talkshow and fight for the Katrina Women sitting at home being indoctrinated by the womyn on The View and Oprah.

She will do more for us in 2010 and rebuild her numbers better than anything else she could do.

11 posted on 07/09/2009 6:55:08 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

I fear not, for I believe that God has a distinct plan for this woman.
At this point, I see her as the “winnowing fork” in His hand, separating the wheat from the chaff.

It really doesn’t matter what office she holds, if any, as long as she is doing God’s will, it will be Good.


12 posted on 07/09/2009 6:57:46 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

“Patton and Lombardi were great at what they did, but would’ve sucked at running for public office.”

Hard to say. However, Palin’s similar qualities play very well in a much more attractive package!

I can’t believe some pundits are floating Romney as our potential 2012 guy...he’s a RINO loser, and in fact reminds me a whole lot of 0bama - too slick, too many lies, plastic.

Sarah, on the other hand, is a true conservative who’s authentic through and through. Character trumps everything else at this point.


13 posted on 07/09/2009 7:02:51 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

Palin is now free to exercise her real power

Alaska Dispatch, by Tim Lindell

The general who advances without coveting fame and retreats without fearing disgrace, whose only thought is to protect his country and do good service for his sovereign, is the jewel of the kingdom.

- Sun Tzu

Like virtually all political observers, I was at first surprised by Governor Palin’s decision to hand the reins of Alaska governance over to Lieutenant Governor Parnell. On the national stage, it sent the entirety of the political and chattering classes hurtling into the air like a flock of geese flushed by a hunter, flapping wildly and honking their displeasure. Palin’s announcement, made by the shore of Lake Lucille far from the centers of national power and culture, knocked Michael Jackson’s death and the President’s Russian visit out of the headlines for days, and sent network talking heads scurrying for their travel agents to book flights to Anchorage.

On the tube, in print, on talk radio and in the blogosphere, we were treated to an endless parade of pundits offering opinions. The same people who have been telling us since last fall that “Palin is finished, she has no future in national politics” were now saying “Okay, now she is really finished — I mean it this time!” Political consultants who spent the last days of the 2008 political campaign telling us that the governorship of Alaska was an insignificant job not suitable to prepare a person for the office of Vice President, and who undoubtedly giggled behind their hands when then-Senator Obama referred to Palin as “The Mayor of Wasilly,” suddenly were insisting that she was abandoning a critical post.

Alaskan critics — in the press, local politics, and the blogosphere — who had worked tirelessly to cripple even routine functions of the Palin Administration were suddenly tsk-tsking with concern and disappointment that Palin had “let them down.” In most cases, notably among the Alaskan progressive blogosphere, the “disappointment” carried a heavy undertone of schadenfreude and self-congratulation. The national press went straight back to the same old Alaskan figures it has always relied on as foils to Palin — French, Kerttula, Ramras, Gara, Hawker, Persily — presenting their opinions as representative of ordinary Alaskans.

Speculation raged about her real motivations. In a notable nadir for cable news, Rick Sanchez of CNN opined that she must be pregnant again. Nearly everyone in the Beltway projected their own motivations onto her; politicos framed the debate in terms of her political future, consultants framed it in terms of book deals and paid speaking engagements, TV hosts framed it in terms of Palin herself joining their ranks. Others, encouraged by some particularly vile rumors created on the left side of the blogosphere, insisted that there simply HAD to be a huge scandal about to hit. After all, everyone knows that you only release news on a Friday to bury it! In the meantime, this “buried” news of her resignation was burning up every news source in the country.

More importantly, the news was burning up the venue in which Palin’s core of supporters and advocates resides — the conservative blogs. And it was the subject of endless discussion in the places where her national constituency gather and live...at backyard Fourth of July barbeques, in the bleachers at Little League baseball games, at small-town fireworks displays, in the kitchens and around the dining tables of family gatherings over the holiday weekend. These are people who don’t obsessively follow politics, but are beginning to awaken with a deep sense of disgust for the condition of our national political discourse...and an equally deep sense of disgust for the politicians of both parties that have brought us here, and for the media that enabled them. To these folks, who often refer to Palin as “Our Sarah,” each attack by the Beltway class simply slaps another layer of concrete on their support for her.

Along with most of those Palin supporters, I didn’t need to speculate about some hidden Machiavellian reason for her resignation. Unlike the national punditocracy, I’d actually been following what Governor Palin had been doing in Alaska since her return from the campaign. And after overcoming the initial surprise and actually listening to her speech, I understood and agreed with her.

In our jaded and cynical times, we expect politicians to speak in the language of vagueness and spin, making it necessary to sift through endless verbal dross to find nuggets of truth. But Palin speaks plainly, and spoke clearly about her reasons in her Friday announcement, reasons both personal and political. They included facts that are beyond dispute - her children have been the subject of the most savage attacks in the history of modern politics. She’s been subjected to a barrage of frivolous legal complaints that placed her family in deep debt and bogged down the mechanisms of state government. This has been accomplished with the cooperation of a complicit press that gave a pulpit to every one of her enemies, while denying her the opportunity to present her own defense.

If Palin were truly the power-hungry, narcissistic backwoods grifter that her opponents eagerly attempt to portray her as, she would have stayed in office and enjoyed the title and the perks. (Such perks that remain - after all, she got rid of the state jet, the Governor’s chef, turned in the state SUV in order to drive her own Jetta, and slashed her expenses to a small fraction of her predecessors’.) She could have coasted along as a do-nothing Governor - making no waves, introducing no controversial legislation, keeping the legislature happy by obtaining as much vote-buying pork for them as possible, and acceding to the wishes of their corporate and union campaign donors. But Palin is not the type to be a do-nothing Governor, she has a vision for Alaska - a vision that includes a major role as a source of energy for the nation, a strategic role in national defense, and local destiny in the hands of the people, not far away in Washington.

But Palin can no longer achieve that vision as Alaska’s chief executive. I’ve watched her try heroically since her return from the campaign trail. As she gave only a handful of interviews to the national press, Alaskan critics accused her of seeking the spotlight. As she practically glued herself to Alaska, leaving only for a few short trips, she was excoriated for “abandoning the state.” Her admirable work in obtaining charitable assistance for economically suffering Western Alaska villages, and in facilitating employment for their residents, was thrown back in her face by critics who insisted that federal handouts were the only way to really help. And the drumbeat of frivolous complaints continued in the background, eating up the time and resources of her staff and the financial resources of the state - while legislators actually complained in the press that she no longer brought them bagels.

The only choice left to her, if she truly wanted to see her vision for Alaska carried forward, was to pass the ball to a teammate. To continue the work she’s started, work that will continue past the end of her term in 2010, she had to put that teammate in a better position to win the 2010 gubernatorial election. By passing to Parnell now, and giving him time to establish himself as a leader with the people of Alaska, she greatly improved his chances.

Palin’s power now lies in her role as a spokeswoman, an advocate, a symbol. Like it or not, she is now the most famous Alaskan ever to have lived - a situation likely to continue through our lifetimes. She has never failed to advocate for Alaska and its future, and I’m certain that she will continue to do so in whatever role she plays on the national stage.

And what of that national role? There is a deep fracture in the Republican Party; this is a situation that anyone can see. Palin didn’t cause it, but she has come to symbolize it...because she is loved by the grassroots of the party, and that same grassroots has come to despise the party leadership. While professional GOP politicians in Washington engage in games of incumbency, triangulation, and vote-buying, conservatives across the country have never given up searching for another Reagan - a conservative politician who can imbue optimism, carry forward a message of pride in our country, strong national defense, and fiscal conservatism - thus reuniting the traditional factions of the party. Many already believe that Palin is that person, and will accept no substitute.

Sarah Palin already has the power to destroy the GOP, simply by taking her constituency off the field with her. That’s why I’ve always viewed the attacks on her by other GOP politicos to be colossally stupid - especially given the fact that she strictly obeys Reagan’s Eleventh Commandment and never herself criticizes another national Republican figure. But her power base also gives her the ability to remake the party, and apparently this is the role she has chosen. By using the financial resources, volunteers, and bully pulpit that she can command, she can shape the candidates and the message for the conservative movement. And this is a role in which national Democrats should fear her, not some purely speculative 2012 or 2016 presidential run.

It’s going to be fascinating watching her on the battlefield, free of the constraints of both Alaskan state politics and the incompetent McCain campaign. I can’t wait.

Tim Lindell is a Nebraska-based libertarian blogger.


14 posted on 07/09/2009 7:08:37 AM PDT by roses of sharon (It is not actual suffering but a taste of better things which excites people to revolt: Hoffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
If Sarah's not on the ticket, there's a pretty good chance I won't be voting next time around.

Especially if romney, newt or hucklebee get the nod...
15 posted on 07/09/2009 7:10:05 AM PDT by novemberslady (leap of faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Crolis
The MSM has declared open season on Palin. She won't go away and disappear, so they will try everything to sully her character.

American voters (the ones who elected our current ‘President’) will swallow anything the MSM hands them. There is an element in this country which has habituated itself to being conned... and this in a way and to an extent which is absolutely breathtaking! Of course, the MSM can expect positive results for their efforts with THESE people, so all they have to do is continue their barrage,no matter how groundless or fraudulent the charges. It's up to the rest of us to stand our ground...TOGETHER!

16 posted on 07/09/2009 7:12:58 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else" Lucius Septimus Severus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty; novemberslady; MrB
If Sarah's not on the ticket, there's a pretty good chance I won't be voting next time around.

That's your choice to make.

I felt that way about Thompson, but he ended up endorsing McCain.

If Sarah does not run, and only Huck, Mitt or some other RINO runs, do you really think she will withhold her endorsement of the "not-Obama" candidate?

Think about it: In the most overt way possible, she's already endorsed the biggest RINO ever--McPain!

I only have two real chances to vote NO on Obama's socialist agenda: 2010, 2012.

And hell and high water will not stop me from voting against him, whoever it is who opposes them.

17 posted on 07/09/2009 7:22:12 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Let’s make sure that the appropriate label is used.
“Elitist RINO”.

Let’s define the fight clearly.


18 posted on 07/09/2009 7:23:38 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MrB
“Elitist RINO”.

Ok. But I think the Republican in Name Only is such a meaningless thing.

Conservative In Name Only is more informative.

Blue Dog Democrats is definitive.

RINO doesn't mean anything if the GOP has morphed under full control of the Rockefeller wing.

19 posted on 07/09/2009 7:31:01 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
I will not vote for romney or newt or hucklebee.
I've drawn a line in the sand.

If the gop is determined to push one of those three on me, they'll simply pull what they pulled last election.

They'll put Sarah on the ticket.

But I'm not voting for any of the three of them.
20 posted on 07/09/2009 7:31:15 AM PDT by novemberslady (leap of faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson