Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin's Popularity in GOP Soars After Quitting
Cleveland Leader ^ | Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Posted on 07/08/2009 8:13:03 AM PDT by kristinn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 301-311 next last
To: MrsEmmaPeel
Would you be willing to pay twice your gross annual salary for the priviledge of working, year after year?

You've had some very patient and kind people explain Sarah's decision to you, so clearly that any six-year-old could understand. I believe you clearly understand, and that you are spamming your anti-Palin rhetoric because you have loyalties to something other than conservative issues.

Tell us, what elitist snob would you prefer to see trying to rally opposition to the communists currently in power?

241 posted on 07/08/2009 12:08:04 PM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
you are clearly to dense to answer

You argue like a liberal - whip out insults instead of a civil discussion. I'm done with this. Have the last word and insult away.

242 posted on 07/08/2009 12:09:11 PM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel (a government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
I am glad you won our difference of opinion.

Dude! We are both winners in the Palin sweepstakes... :)

243 posted on 07/08/2009 12:09:59 PM PDT by John123 (Turn on your teleprompter Obama and read your lips... "No New Taxes!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

That’s what it is - you nailed it.
You’re either with the elitists, or you prefer individualism.

There is no neutrality here. Something about SP prevents that option.


244 posted on 07/08/2009 12:10:44 PM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes
Hope that you wake up soon. There will NEVER be a strong third party.

To me a strong third party was all of those tea parties.

245 posted on 07/08/2009 12:16:51 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel

You have been insulting Sarah Palin since you hit this thread. And for your information, I’m no liberal. I will however, defend a gem like Sarah Palin no matter what I’m called. Discussion over. CO


246 posted on 07/08/2009 12:18:37 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what an antibiotic is to an infection - Healing!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

I once heard from a caller on the Sean Hannity Show that Sarah Palin’s good look is why leftist women hate her because they are not as attractive. It is jealousy.


247 posted on 07/08/2009 12:22:59 PM PDT by Ptarmigan (God Hates Bunnies. God Loves Ptarmigans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: MrB
I just loved that Fox News interview clip with Sarah pulling in the nets while answering questions. What the Dems hate is that the scenes are REAL -- she and Todd have been fishing that area year after year.

The DC/NY people who can't identify with Sarah are outnumbered 20 to 1 by the rest of the people who can. She and/or we won't win them all over, but I strongly believe she can rally a very healthy majority.

248 posted on 07/08/2009 12:27:58 PM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

SP’s authenticity is another thing that drives the left nuts.

They KNOW they can’t be authentic and speak from their core values, or 90% of the public would reject them.

They also know that, by comparison to SP, their attempts to hide their core values becomes obvious.


249 posted on 07/08/2009 12:29:56 PM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Absolutely lovely. But then again she always is.


250 posted on 07/08/2009 12:30:46 PM PDT by CharterOakie (It's Sarah's if she wants it. 1 John 4:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Dowd has CRAZY written all over her.


251 posted on 07/08/2009 12:34:05 PM PDT by Miss Behave (OMG, my tagline is stalking me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

My! My! You ain’t kidding!


252 posted on 07/08/2009 12:46:56 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #253 Removed by Moderator

To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
254 posted on 07/08/2009 12:55:52 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goldwaterepublican

Penn is a conservative, isn’t he? And that gif has been around for YEARS, long before Sarah hit the scene last summer.


255 posted on 07/08/2009 12:59:03 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

Comment #256 Removed by Moderator

To: kristinn

The fact that the establishmedia hates her is good enough for most Conservatives.

Pray for America and Gov Palin


257 posted on 07/08/2009 1:11:34 PM PDT by bray (Rope & Chains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth
"Shaking in their boots comes to mind! :) "

Even in a crappy stock market, I'd give consideration to heavily investing in Kimberly Clark!
(There WILL be a run on Depend Underwear.)

258 posted on 07/08/2009 1:28:23 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel; SuziQ
Oh, cry me a river! And she'll have NO lawsuits if she's Prez???? Bill Clinton showed us you can be Prez and be sued. With Palin, it will only get worse.

Idiots in the press (left-wing hate bloggers) were behind the nuisance lawsuits.

The answer is NOT to resign, but to have serious "loser-pays" penalties in place -- tough enough to discourage this kind of idiotic hate mongering.


You are refusing to look at this logically.

She and her staff were spending 80% of her/their time dealing with these bogus, false ethic charges.

Furthermore, she is limited by her own budget as to how many people she can hire and the resources she can apply to this issue. She does not have an infinite number of people to handle this.

And finally, with regards to your suggestion concerning "loser-pays", she is the Chief Executive, not the legislative branch.

She does not have the power to wave her magic wand to create a new law.

While your idea has merit, it has no value right now, and given the animus that the GOP has for her in Alaska, there is no way that Law or anything like it was going to get passed during the remainder of her term.

She had no other option, if she wanted to continue to be effective in the GOP both in Alaska and the Nation at large.
259 posted on 07/08/2009 1:31:38 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Bookmark to join when I get home!


260 posted on 07/08/2009 1:31:38 PM PDT by Dooderbutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson