Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/06/2009 2:23:17 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Berlin_Freeper

You mean the reasons she gave for resigning are the reasons she is resigning? Who woulda thunk it.


2 posted on 07/06/2009 2:27:08 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper

From the article:

“Here’s the bottom line: She has a ton of support, but she felt behind a desk her resources were being wasted,” said Ms. Cole, who runs a real-estate business. “She thinks she can get things done more efficiently this way.”
*************************************************************

Sarah’s gonna travel around the country and she’s gonna build up support for a 2012 presidential run! SHE IS GONNA WIN IN 2012!!!!!!! YEAH, BABY!!!!!!!!

I am so excited! I’ve been donating to SARAHPAC and I’m gonna join her 2012 campaign, once it gets going!


3 posted on 07/06/2009 2:28:19 PM PDT by wk4bush2004 (SA-RAH, 20-12! SA-RAH, 20-12! SA-RAH, 20-12! SARAH PALIN, HELL YEAH!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Good for her for putting Alaska first.


5 posted on 07/06/2009 2:30:10 PM PDT by Danae (Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper

there is such an absolute vaccuum out there waiting to be filled by a voice that will take on Obama, she’ll be fine.


6 posted on 07/06/2009 2:30:52 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper

In other words, Palin has proved that she is susceptible to the Cloward-Piven strategy.


7 posted on 07/06/2009 2:34:41 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in an attempt to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations who utilize the courts as a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to silence another’s speech. RICO could be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or their clients conspired and collaborated to concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in retribution and retaliation for themselves having been brought before the courts.


11 posted on 07/06/2009 2:37:23 PM PDT by big bad easter bunny (I live so far beyond my means it could be said we live apart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Sarah coverage on this site rivals Micheal Jackson coverage on the MSM. Both are getting old fast.

Theres plenty of time before a campaign can start.

15 posted on 07/06/2009 2:43:17 PM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Ain't that what the woman said!!

Trivasanno tonight said there were 15 investigations in the last 2 years.

Results: Nothing, not a thing.

42 posted on 07/06/2009 3:40:39 PM PDT by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper; hoosiermama; RasterMaster
Gotta love the WSJ:

In the "Troopergate" matter, an investigation by an agency under her office cleared her of any wrongdoing, while one headed by a legislative committee concluded she had abused her office.

Meanwhile, the following had been posted at the time, on the Flopping Aces website:

Talk about a stacked deck!

Sarah Palin is being investigated by the Alaska Legislative Counsel for any improper action she may have taken in firing the State’s public safety commissioner or any pressure Palin may have put on him regarding her brother in law: a State Trooper known for being violent towards members of his family and threatening to kill Palin’s father.

Mata Harley has the whole story covered in detail.

Questions about the partisan nature of the investigation arose after State Senator Hollis French (D), project manager for the investigation, promised the findings would be an “October surprise.”

Further questions regarding the objectivity of this investigation are raised by the following photograph which shows some Democrat members of the Alaska Legislative Counsel and State Sen. French, at an Obama event July 30, 2008. From the official Obama web site:

(Click link above for rest of article and links.)

This "legislative committee" is referenced again in a recent article at Flopping Aces:

4: Sept. 2, 2008: Palin files an ethics complaint request on her Troopergate charges, saying that the legislative investigation has now become too political. This is the first of the three Troopergate related ethics charges, atop the legislative investigation. One day before the election, the Personnel Board dismissed the charges, saying the firing of Monegan violated no ethics laws. As I said… already been there, done that… see the Troopergate series archives.

WSJ's brief reference to the findings of "a legislative committee" would naturally put doubt in the mind of the reader that, perhaps, Sarah had been guilty of some wrongdoing, especially because it was the "agency under her office" that cleared her.

Slimy, aren't they?

46 posted on 07/06/2009 3:59:40 PM PDT by Lauren BaRecall (Proud heterosexual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Palin Confidante Cites Distraction of Investigations

What part of the word confidante doen't this woman understand????

56 posted on 07/06/2009 4:40:13 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson