I find it abhorrent that you want to murder two human beings even if somehow they are slightly responsible for the death of a few pets.
Maybe they got off with a “slap on the wrist” because the case against them was very weak (i.e. the prosecution would have lost in court) and this is the best deal the prosecutor was able to make in order to claim victory.
Slightly responsible? They either are, or they aren't responsible.
"Men are not hanged for stealing horses, but that horses may not be stolen"
The case against them was not “weak”, it was open and shut. Their actions were responsible for the horrible deaths of many thousands of cats and dogs, not just a few. Those of us who followed it carefully and fearfully knew the devastation among pet owners. But I guess the court figured all of our losses were “only” pets.
There was no justice.
Abhor to your heart’s content, newbie. I could not care less about your delicate feeewings. Thousands of pets suffered and died as a result of ther actions...a hanging offense in my book.