Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin -- All In
American Thinker ^ | July 6, 2009 | Jay Valentine

Posted on 07/06/2009 11:01:20 AM PDT by DB9

There is a point in tournament poker where one player doesn't have the chips to play out the next raise, but they have great cards, so they call "all in." At that point, nobody can raise them and the hand gets played out -- either to a game changing win or a total loss for the person who made the call.

It appears Sarah Palin decided she and her family could no longer deal with the thousand cuts, so she is "all in."

Palin may well decide to stay home and make macaroni and cheese for the kids, but history may not let her. She has already established herself as a major player -- candidate or not. More importantly, the wildly critical left has put her in a financial position where she has no choice but to speak out, perhaps do a book, and make the money she needs to pay legal bills for 15 unwarranted "ethics" investigations, all of which she handily won. The legal bills remain.

One doubts that when she speaks out, it will be about how to field dress a moose. Rather, she will take positions in speaking and writing about her core beliefs. That is a problem for the radical left of their own creation.

Palin enters the arena where the fight is not between liberal and conservative; nor is it between Republican and Democrat. The fight is between elite and the common person who works every day and continually asks how Washington D.C., under both parties, is so out of control.

Elitism has never been popular in America. Major American critics from H.L Menken to Rush Limbaugh made careers poking fun at elites.

Elitism is on display today as never before. Senate and Congressional seats are passed down in the family. Just look at the family members lining up for Ted Kennedy's seat or Caroline's assumption that she deserved the New York Senate seat. Vice President Biden's Senate seat is being kept warm for his son, now serving in the Middle East. Lots of talk that Michelle Obama may be the next Illinois senator.

Hereditary government on display. How much more elitist can a nation become?

The fight is between an out of control government led by media and government elites and common sense Americans, of both parties, who have had enough. Sarah Palin is in the enviable, although personally painful position, of being the "anti elite" voice of common sense and shared American values.

The vicious left put her there and now they may live to regret it.

When informed of the invention of "poison gas" by Admiral Cochrane, the Duke of Wellington cautioned that "that is a game two can play." He wisely chose not to go there because it would certainly be used by both sides.

The parallel exists with Saul Alinsky, the progenitor of much radical leftist smear techniques. His key dictum was that ridicule had no antidote. Sarah Palin was wildly successful heaping ridicule on Obama during the campaign, when he was at his best.

Nothing is more easily and cogently ridiculed than elitism.

Obama even appointed an elite college professor who posits that animals should have legal rights to sue their owners. Can one imagine Sarah Palin foisting this foolish, elitist intellectual on the question: "well, then professor, shouldn't a 6 month, developed fetus have the same legal rights as a chicken?" Make Obama defend that position.

Now Obama is finding the treading a bit harder. Rasmussen polls show a weakening of his approval numbers and all polls agree that most Americans do not support cap and tax, do not want illegals to get health care funded by taxpayers and now are becoming pro life. Wide swaths of informed citizens are coming to understand man made global warming is a hoax used to heap new energy taxes on them. Only elites, from both parties, can propose such nonsense.

Even Colin Powell, the truest weathervane of elitist thinking, is openly questioning Obama's spending. Certainly he did not get these doubts from listening to Rush Limbaugh. Perhaps, Colin Powell senses where this is going, and it is not going his way.

Sara Palin takes on the "fancy people" from a position, eagerly given to her by her enemies, of being a "common" person who went to an ordinary college, has typical family problems, is married to a guy who works in an oil field, buys her kid's diapers at WalMart. If the fight is with the elites, what better background could one have?

Ayn Rand said that there is right and there is wrong, and everything in the middle is evil. Sarah Palin is not a person from the middle. She has her beliefs and lives them in her daily life. Her children are her life's work, they are not accessories.

Nobody is better positioned, as a candidate or commentator, to take on the elites and the nonsense they put forward.

What an irony if the only American President who can make a 3 point shot were taken out by a point guard who came up to his shoulder. And if the guard was a chick -- who went to a no name school?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: iquitarod; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

1 posted on 07/06/2009 11:01:20 AM PDT by DB9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DB9

“All in” was the term I used on Friday,

thank you very much.

Also, “stepping out in faith” is applicable.


2 posted on 07/06/2009 11:02:18 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB9

“Winners never quit and quitters never win!”—Vince Lombardi


3 posted on 07/06/2009 11:02:59 AM PDT by meandog (Doh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB9

Go Sarah, no matter what your objectives are. We need a a lot more like her to run for the Congress.....


4 posted on 07/06/2009 11:04:06 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Except sometimes they do.


5 posted on 07/06/2009 11:04:57 AM PDT by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Only elites, from both parties, can propose such nonsense.

And interestingly, I just added a tagline to my posts for the first time ever, just about 10 minutes and two posts ago.

6 posted on 07/06/2009 11:07:23 AM PDT by john in springfield (One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe such things.No ordinary man could be such a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DB9

Great points made in the article about what [earthly part of] the struggle is about - elites vs individualists.

The leftist/statist elite, whether it is a conscious thought or not, are wanting a feudalist system in which they are the property owning nobility and everyone else lives or dies at their pleasure.


7 posted on 07/06/2009 11:07:42 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB9

Sarah has made a brilliant move. Guess what everyone was talking about at the Teaparty that I went to on the Fourth?

The economy, unemployment, and Sarah!


8 posted on 07/06/2009 11:08:15 AM PDT by proudpapa (Obama - Worst One Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB9
This is one of if not the best article I have read regarding Sarah. I just love that woman, whatever she decides to do, I am glad to know she is out there. What a lift she gave so many of us.

And yeah, if she stays in, she will have a BALL ridiculing uhbama's picks, his appointees as it were. Ya have to be really stupid to make the picks this man has. I mean seriously stupid or totally depraved. One of the two, for sure.

9 posted on 07/06/2009 11:08:26 AM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

I personally believe she had no choice. As governor, her salary is $125,000. The unending frivolous “ethics” complaints” have cost her in excess of $500,000. These complaints were not going to end. Basically, it was costing her to be governor far more than she was making. Would you stay in a position like that? I know I wouldn’t. She did not inherit millions of dollars like Mitt Romney (who, by the way, will never be president) and is not wealthy. She is the main breadwinner for her family, a very large family with a special needs child.


10 posted on 07/06/2009 11:10:15 AM PDT by DB9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I think Sarah’s motive is to influence American politics, to play on the largest stage she can, to be a force for good, to use her energy, talents and “wiring” to the fullest extent, and if that leads to a high office then so be it.

The media attacks on never have and never will affect her goals.


11 posted on 07/06/2009 11:10:31 AM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DB9; Bahbah; kanawa

12 posted on 07/06/2009 11:11:08 AM PDT by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
"Nothing is more easily and cogently ridiculed than elitism."

And now she's free to do it with zeal !!!

13 posted on 07/06/2009 11:11:18 AM PDT by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: meandog
“Winners never quit and quitters never win!”—Vince Lombardi

And yet, the Welfare State persists...

14 posted on 07/06/2009 11:11:31 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DB9

You and this writer are both dead-on. It’s all about Elitism, regardless of political stripe. One of the best pieces I have read.


15 posted on 07/06/2009 11:12:10 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog
“Winners never quit and quitters never win!”—Vince Lombardi

Pains me to say it as a Cavs fan but:

Phil Jackson - Quit with the Bulls after 1998 season.
Quit Lakers after '04 season.

I think I heard that he's quitting again this year.

NBA Champions 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998 (Chicago)
NBA Champions 2000, 2001, 2002 (LA Lakers stint #1)
NBA Champions 2009 (LA Lakers stint #2)
16 posted on 07/06/2009 11:12:29 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DB9

” make the money she needs to pay legal bills for 15 unwarranted “ethics” investigations, all of which she handily won. The legal bills remain. “

I don’t get this.
Why can she not go after these people and sue to recover the expenses they put her through?
They filed the complaints simply to cause her to incur legal expenses; she should have recourse against them.


17 posted on 07/06/2009 11:13:00 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (I agree with Rick..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

If there were recourse for frivolous lawsuits,
there would be less frivolous lawsuits,
and lawyers wouldn’t profit from them.

Lawyers make the tort laws.


One lawyer in a town will go broke.
Two lawyers in a town will own it in 10 years.


18 posted on 07/06/2009 11:14:37 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DB9
It's all about Elitism. All roads lead back to it.
19 posted on 07/06/2009 11:14:49 AM PDT by Miss Behave (OMG, my tagline is stalking me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB9

God Bless her.


20 posted on 07/06/2009 11:14:53 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("I've conquered my goddam willpower." Don Marquis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson