Skip to comments.
Sarah Palin, New Party ?????
vanity
| 07/03/2008
| taildragger
Posted on 07/03/2009 6:40:30 PM PDT by taildragger
Like many here, I am a political prognosticator. I followed Sarah Palin here for almost 2 years and told friends last May if McCain only chance is to pick Palin. So what does Sarah Palin's latest move mean?
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2012; fedindictmentcoming; gopimplosion; independent; palin; parties; quitter; sarahbarraquitta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 341-358 next last
To: counterpunch
“But then they lost it all once she started talking to the media and embarrassed herself.”
If you really believe that tripe, you are denser than I previously thought in your undying support for FLIP Romney.
241
posted on
07/03/2009 10:34:29 PM PDT
by
RasterMaster
(DUmocrats - the party of slavery, sedition, subversion, socialism & surrender)
To: Texas Fossil
I’m all for (1), (3), and (5).
However, I think (2) may be unconstitutional.
And (4) isn’t necessarily a recipe for conservatism. We tried this approach when we brought a certain squadron commander back from Vietnam. That didn’t work out so well, did it. And then there was that swiftboat commander who ran 4 years earlier. Neither of these guys are posterchildren for conservatism.
242
posted on
07/03/2009 10:36:40 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
(In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
To: counterpunch
Keep in mind kids, Not even Jimmy Carter lost by 10 million votes. How badly did Jimmy Carter lose the 1980 election? Really. .... I believe he lost by 49 states.
243
posted on
07/03/2009 10:38:01 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
To: LucyJo
It doesn’t matter who Palin is surrounded by.
People vote for people, not campaign.
Sarah Palin doesn’t have enough people who want to vote for her as a person.
That’s why she lost to 0bama once already, and will lose again if she goes for a rematch.
244
posted on
07/03/2009 10:38:20 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
(In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
To: itsahoot
No, that was Mondale in 1984.
245
posted on
07/03/2009 10:38:49 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
(In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
To: GovernmentShrinker
“There was NOBODY there.”
Not EVERYONE could make the drive to Wasilla for a previously UNKNOWN announcement. When they know she’s in town, do you honestly think they are sitting on their couches waiting on the RINOs or LIEberal media to tell them what happened?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJeccdI4R1Q
246
posted on
07/03/2009 10:39:30 PM PDT
by
RasterMaster
(DUmocrats - the party of slavery, sedition, subversion, socialism & surrender)
To: mtntop3
If the media wants to focus on her, then finelet them do this as she relates to the events of the day as a much-needed counterpoint to Obama and the Media. If the media ever get to the point of playing fair in the politcal circus - Sarah can more that handle whatever they lob over the net. When they start on the family crap, she needs to smack 'em down the second it starts oozing out their mouths. Do what Dims do and just say the kids are off limits. End of story.
247
posted on
07/03/2009 10:40:09 PM PDT
by
boatbums
(Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
To: itsahoot
Carter only lost by about 8½ million votes.
That’s fewer than McCain-Palin lost by.
248
posted on
07/03/2009 10:40:23 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
(In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
To: RasterMaster
I saw the interviews when she did them.
I was embarrassed for her.
It’s not what I believe, it’s what I saw.
249
posted on
07/03/2009 10:42:08 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
(In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
To: counterpunch
“Carter only lost by about 8½ million votes.
Thats fewer than McCain-Palin lost by.”
Now’s the time to jump ship for that CARTER JUGGERNAUT, don’tchathink?
250
posted on
07/03/2009 10:42:41 PM PDT
by
RasterMaster
(DUmocrats - the party of slavery, sedition, subversion, socialism & surrender)
To: RasterMaster
To: counterpunch
“Its not what I believe, its what I saw.”
It’s what you were SPOONFED from the RINOs and LIEberal media...I saw the interviews too.
252
posted on
07/03/2009 10:44:22 PM PDT
by
RasterMaster
(DUmocrats - the party of slavery, sedition, subversion, socialism & surrender)
To: counterpunch
Ive got no agenda beyond analyzing the current situation as it is. More wishful thinking than analysis, since no one knows her plan.
The next battle in this country is for the salvation of the Republic, either lead or get out of the way. Useless ankle biting does not help.
When one of your picks can attract 20,000+ without giving a free pop concert, then I will respect your choice. Until then cork it.
253
posted on
07/03/2009 10:44:27 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
To: counterpunch
When we bring commanders home from Iraq and Afghanistan we should seek out the best to run for public office and clean out the leeches.I stated that we should be selective.
John Fnnnn Kerry should have been court marshaled. He was and is a total fraud.
As far as the tele commute thing. They currently do not vote in the chamber in all occasions. And it is done electronically. I am not a constitutional scholar, but to me it makes a lot of sense to move the power center from DC. I feel the survival of the Nation depends on it. The Constitution could be amended to allow it.
254
posted on
07/03/2009 10:46:30 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
To: counterpunch
the Duncan Hunterites, the Alan Keyesters, all the crybabies who say theyre going to pack up their toys and not be team players if they dont get their no-shot candidate. So they didn't show up, even after all your non-condescending encouragement. Sad day for you, huh?
255
posted on
07/03/2009 10:47:46 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
To: counterpunch
Yes, it does matter if Sarah, or anyone else, has people around her who want her to succeed or to fail.
Sarah wasn’t the loser on that ticket.
256
posted on
07/03/2009 10:48:01 PM PDT
by
LucyJo
("...guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism...". George Washington)
To: counterpunch
Ok...in this post alone you say Sarah “imploded” twice. What do you mean by this? Sarah inploded in what way!! you are throwing this crap out and hoping someone will just accept your statement. WHAT IMPLOSION ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
257
posted on
07/03/2009 10:49:27 PM PDT
by
boatbums
(Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
To: counterpunch
She hasnt done her homework and shes turned herself into a one-woman media circus. And how many votes did you get in the last election? And you are so wise, shame.
258
posted on
07/03/2009 10:50:21 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
To: RasterMaster
It’s a safer bet than the Palin juggernaut.
By about 2 million votes.
259
posted on
07/03/2009 10:51:36 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
(In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
To: itsahoot
Bingo!!! I think we have a winner!
When one of your picks can attract 20,000+ without giving a free pop concert, then I will respect your choice. Until then cork it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 341-358 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson