Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin, New Party ?????
vanity | 07/03/2008 | taildragger

Posted on 07/03/2009 6:40:30 PM PDT by taildragger

Like many here, I am a political prognosticator. I followed Sarah Palin here for almost 2 years and told friends last May if McCain only chance is to pick Palin. So what does Sarah Palin's latest move mean?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2012; fedindictmentcoming; gopimplosion; independent; palin; parties; quitter; sarahbarraquitta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-358 next last
To: ansel12

I don’t think you need to move left to win an election.
You just have to pick the right candidate.
Sarah Palin is not the right candidate.
She hasn’t done her homework and she’s turned herself into a one-woman media circus.

Oh, yeah, and she’s ALREADY LOST TO 0BAMA ONCE BEFORE.
Hello, McFly! Anybody in there?

When something isn’t working, STOP DOING IT.


181 posted on 07/03/2009 9:14:12 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Romney was the most effective advocate for McCain, and he did have the sharpest teeth.
What part of that do you disagree with?


182 posted on 07/03/2009 9:15:03 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You still didn’t answer the questions.
Did you prefer McCain to Romney as the GOP nominee?
Did you refuse to support McCain over 0bama?

Who did you vote for? McCain or 0bama?
Or did you stay home and not vote?

Answer honestly, if you have it in you.


183 posted on 07/03/2009 9:18:16 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Nixon lost to JFK for the Presidency

Nixon then ran against Brown for Governor of California - and lost again

Nixon then ran again for President and won two (2) terms

The 60s radicals - including a crooked Hillary railroaded Nixon in network televised impeachment hearings


184 posted on 07/03/2009 9:19:42 PM PDT by devolve (- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sarah Palin 2012 - - - - - - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
counterpunch...
Are you a Romney supporter??
Just asking...
185 posted on 07/03/2009 9:20:30 PM PDT by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
..the GOP went from being the party of Sarah Palin to the party of Mehgan McCain...

Quote of the day. Speaking of...where is Mehgs these days? I haven't read a dispatch from Slutz Ultra Lounge in several months.

186 posted on 07/03/2009 9:21:29 PM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

If Palin decided to form a new party, she would have a lot of support. I think people like Bachmann et al would join her and she could blow the remnants of the liberal controlled GOP out of the water.


187 posted on 07/03/2009 9:23:37 PM PDT by ZULU (God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: haircutter

I supported Romney in the final stretch of the primaries when it was down to him vs. McCain.
I had supported Fred Thompson until he dropped out.

And I am still waiting for the right candidate to jump in the race for 2012.
So far I haven’t seen that person.


188 posted on 07/03/2009 9:24:24 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

What is clear is that you are pro McCain (now pro Romney) and wanted Romney to assume the vice presidency, making him president next.

Long after the election you are energetically trying to clear the field for Romney so we freepers don’t drive the republican party “over a cliff” with a conservative candidate.

You will have to work even harder than you are lately to move FR left, there are still a handful of threads that you aren’t spamming yet.


189 posted on 07/03/2009 9:26:07 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Answer my questions.
Did you support Romney or McCain in the final stretch?
Did you vote for McCain or 0bama, or did you sit the election out?


190 posted on 07/03/2009 9:27:44 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
...but there are not enough of us to get her elected....

I might have to disagree with that. I'm thinking of a poll a couple of months ago in which 60% of Americans considered themselves "conservative". That got me to wondering why we can't rally that kind of political pool. Well, we can because we've done it in the past. Reagan blew Jimmuh out of the water in a landslide election.

Maybe a new party with a very visible, charasmatic leader (Sarah Palin) is the ticket. Even a jug-eared goof neck like Ross Perot managed to get 20% of the vote after he said he was withdrawing from the race. And that thing about having to join the republicans to win races: what's wrong with the republicans joining the conservatives to win races...?

191 posted on 07/03/2009 9:28:14 PM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
"I’m not even sure Palin is really on our side."

Dude, step away from the crackpipe!

192 posted on 07/03/2009 9:28:31 PM PDT by RasterMaster (DUmocrats - the party of slavery, sedition, subversion, socialism & surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

What makes you think I’m “trying to clear the field for Romney”?
I’m hoping for a better candidate than Palin, Romney, or Huckabee to enter the 2012 race.
And I am pretty confident one will.
We’ve got 3 years.
It’s still a long time away.


193 posted on 07/03/2009 9:29:35 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

Well tell me, have you ever seen someone gather up more Republican support and then implode more spectacularly at the most inopportune time than Sarah Palin?

And now her remaining supporters who refuse to see her for the hot mess she is are tearing the GOP apart, even talking of splitting off to form their own party now.

0bama couldn’t have hoped for a better ally.


194 posted on 07/03/2009 9:32:01 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Pretty sure she is positioning for 2016 or 2020. She’ll still be young. She can let Romney lose his shirt against the Obama machine.


195 posted on 07/03/2009 9:34:31 PM PDT by weston (As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

In the meantime you have a single minded obsession with the person standing in his way.

So you have journeyed from Romney for president, to Romney for vice-president, to eliminating the candidate that has been in his way for the next run for president.


196 posted on 07/03/2009 9:35:56 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

I’m not doing your work for you.


197 posted on 07/03/2009 9:39:02 PM PDT by Lauren BaRecall (Proud heterosexual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Lurkus Maximus

We need a Conservative 3rd Party. Not a Ross Perot ego trip but a real, viable 3rd Party. A party of reformers who want to shake things up. A party that glorify the Constitution.
1. It should be a real party with its own contract with America.
2. It should be ready to field people for all jobs, both state and federal office.
3. It should stick up for things like NO GAY Marriage and NO Amnesty for illegals and No to socialist medicine. It should not be a “big Tent” for all people.
4. It should have a plan to save America not some half-baked slogans.
5. And don’t give me that wasted vote BS. To vote for a RINO is the worst form of vote wasting. As for Ross Perot giving us Clinton—maybe it was a good thing. He balanced the budget when his feet were held too the fire. Would Bob Dole have done that? I think not.
6. A viable 3rd party may force the GOP to the right. If these jokers see they could lose their jobs— they may really serve the people rather than their lobbyists.


198 posted on 07/03/2009 9:41:41 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Answer the questions.
Did you vote for McCain?
Did you support him or Romney in the final stretch for the nomination?

Are you impugning every FReeper who supported McCain over 0bama, or supported Romney when he was all that stood between McCain and the nomination?

Because you are in the extreme minority here if you are.
Attacking people for picking the best option out of a bad selection isn’t going to get you very far.

So for the 5th time, answer the questions.


199 posted on 07/03/2009 9:42:14 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Lauren BaRecall

You can’t.
And it’s not my work.
No one knows what 2011 will bring.
So it’s too soon to line up behind someone in a race with no declared candidates.
That’s just the point.

I can’t predict the future, so I can’t tell you who I am supporting in 2011/2012.


200 posted on 07/03/2009 9:44:46 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-358 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson