Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Palin's national political career over? (Sadly, the answer is YES)
Hotair ^ | 7/3/2009 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 07/03/2009 5:24:46 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

The news of Sarah Palin’s resignation as governor came during my show this afternoon, where we spent most of an hour discussing it with the chatizens and my co-host Duane Patterson. I’ve had a chance to watch the video of her announcement and read through dozens of Twitter messages back and forth attempting to rationalize this, and still, it simply can’t be rationalized on the basis of what Palin said today. It’s easily the most bizarre resignation I’ve seen, and just about senseless.

The lame-duck explanation was the most incoherent part of the entire statement:

“Once I decided not to run for re-election, I also felt that to embrace the conventional ‘Lame Duck’ status in this particular climate would just be another dose of ‘politics as usual,’ something I campaigned against and will always oppose. It is my duty to always protect our great state. With that in mind, my family and I determined that it is best to make a difference this summer, and I am willing to change things, so that this administration, with its positive agenda, its accomplishments and its successful road to an incredible future, can continue without interruption and with great administrative and legislative success.”

Bear in mind that the election isn’t next month but about 16 months from now, in November 2010. Using this logic, Palin should never have run for the first term unless she was willing to run for the second, and not run for either if she wasn’t willing (or legally able) to run for a third. Politicians don’t enter lame-duck status until their successor has already been elected and they’re running out the rest of the term. And all politicians become lame ducks at some point — and none of them quit just to avoid it.

Also, how can Palin quit because she didn’t want to deal with being a lame duck and claim in the same breath that her administration would “continue without interruption”? She just interrupted it! If she thinks that being a “lame duck” would hamper her ability to push her agenda in the state’s capital, how does she think that an unelected Sean Parnell is going to get it done?

If it’s her duty to always “protect” Alaska, then that strongly implies not walking away from the responsibility of governing it — a responsibility she sought, and with which her constituents trusted her to execute. No one leads by quitting. No one leads by quitting. Palin’s abandoning her post, and at least from her own description, doing it because she doesn’t want to deal with the issues of being a “lame duck,” a status all politicians have to handle at some point.

I’ve seen a myriad of excuses on Twitter and e-mail for this bizarre resignation: her legal bills are too high, she’s putting her family first, she doesn’t want to distract Alaskans because of cheap-shot ethics complaints that are distracting everyone. None of those make any sense. If the spotlight was too much, then she shouldn’t have run for office in the first place. If she’s quitting because people are taking potshots at her, then she’s not the kind of political fighter we thought she was. The legal bills might be a rational reason, but thoroughly insufficient for betraying the people who put her in charge of Alaska — and her memoirs would have paid for her legal bills many times over, had she completed her term.

There’s really no excuse, and what Rich Lowry also calls her “terrible,” “rambling,” and “not at all persuasive” statement showed that. Unless there was a serious illness or a serious scandal, the resignation on the grounds Palin gave is simply incomprehensible. She has destroyed her own credibiity in a single day.

I liked Sarah Palin and supported her inclusion on the GOP ticket last fall. I thought she had more toughness than this. It’s a big disappointment, and it’s the end of any hope of Palin getting taken seriously as a politician on the national level in the future.

Update (AP): I was going to tuck this into one of my own posts but it fits better here. Quin Hillyer, senior editor at the Spectator, calls the resignation an “appalling dereliction of duty.”

What Sarah Palin did today was get out before the real challenges of the job (whatever challenges there are for such an easy job) really rear their heads. The going got tough in terms of spurious ethics charges against her, and she took off. That’s cowardly. That’s not sign of staying power. It’s a sign of wanting to get out while the getting is good, in order to become a full-time candidate for a presidential race that won’t culminate for 3 1/2 more years. It’s a little too calculating, by half — or more.

I just listened to her speech announcing her decision, and found it singularly unimpressive. “This was a rambling, bombastic, self-centered, ‘poor me’ kind of speech.” That’s how Mike Carey of the Anchorage Daily News just described her speech on Fox News. I agree. He then said it was, darn, I already can’t remember if he said it was “pitiful” or “pathetic,” but it was some word like that. Again, I agree. It was a speech in which she clearly made a bit for a national audience — not a very effective bid, but a transparent one — but didn’t adequately explain to the people of Alaska why she was relinquishing her duty…

Statesmen hang tough. Sarah Palin is cutting and running. ‘Nuff said.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: careerishistory; gopimplosion; palin; quitter; resignation; sarahbarraquitta; sarahpalin; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 341-351 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Yeah, I thought the lame duck excuse was pretty pathetic, too.

On the other hand, I wouldn't stay in and let the socialists bankrupt my family.

261 posted on 07/03/2009 8:51:28 PM PDT by Texas_shutterbug (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The GOP has failed, time and time again, to follow Ann Coulter's Rule No. 3 (How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must), p.10):

“You must outrage the enemy. If the liberal you’re arguing with doesn’t become speechless with sputtering, impotent rage, you’re not doing it right. People don’t get angry when lies are told about them; they get angry when the truth is told about them. If you are not being called outrageous by liberals, you’re not being outrageous enough. Start with the maximum assertion about liberals and then push the envelope, because, as we know, their evil is incalculable.”

262 posted on 07/03/2009 8:52:02 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtntop3
You have the same take on that piece (of shovel ready) as I did. If one wants to be nice, one could say it was a piece of over analysis. Get some dirt on it quick, it stinks!

Sarah is going to use some Alaska strong whup ass on the Obamanitwits and their court of mind numbed robot yes men.

Wait until Sarah shows up at a few Tea Parties. Instead of 1000 people at them, we will see crowds that will make TOTUS toast and the state run media in babble land.

263 posted on 07/03/2009 8:53:24 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Obama Administration is a blueprint for Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: heye2monn
"Dear Sarah, why don’t you practice?"

Because no one is writing great speeches for her to practice? :)

264 posted on 07/03/2009 8:54:39 PM PDT by Texas_shutterbug (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon
Give us all the name of this great new leader. Heck, it can be a lesbian hispanic black female midget single mother. As long as they are well spoken and will advance the conservative platform that you have so eloquently outlined for every ones edification. I can not find it right now, yet I am certain that you will post it in bold text in your reply.
265 posted on 07/03/2009 8:58:51 PM PDT by AH_LiveRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Sorry, but running away never solves a problem coming from the left.


266 posted on 07/03/2009 9:00:09 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AH_LiveRight

...and your pick is....?


267 posted on 07/03/2009 9:00:17 PM PDT by rbmillerjr ("We Are All Socialists Now"........not me, not now, not ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: AH_LiveRight

I do not feed trolls.

Bye.


268 posted on 07/03/2009 9:00:48 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

My pick is: “There is no balm in Gilead”. The American people are beyond having the freedom to pick.


269 posted on 07/03/2009 9:02:30 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
...Are you concerned he might up and quit in the middle of his 1st term as President?

LOL! Only because I can't fathom a President Biden!

Look, it just doesn't make any real sense for her to quit in the middle of her first term. It gives her enemies yet another stone to throw at her. Reagan served two terms as Governor and then hit the "rubber chicken"/GE factory tour circuit. He published thoughtful op-eds and gave substantive speeches after he left office.

270 posted on 07/03/2009 9:02:34 PM PDT by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Texas_shutterbug

Yeah, I thought the lame duck excuse was pretty pathetic, too.

On the other hand, I wouldn’t stay in and let the socialists bankrupt my family.


Try Doctor Zero’s analysis at Hot Air....pretty much a 180 from Ed Morrissey’s article.

Interesting I just was listenning to Mark Levin, who has been around a while and has pretty good conservatie political street cred, and he thinks Palin’s resignation was actaully a pretty good idea—she can spend more time in lower 48 with fundraising, networking with folks who actualy could help her in a 2012 run. She could not do that if she continues on as Governor.

Regarding Lame Duck, Why is it no one said anything about Obama only serving one year of his 6 year term (he was not there more than 141 days and pretty much voted present on most bills when he was). Actually, I appreciate Sarah being direct and leaving office if she did not feel she was effective doing the job==unlike the occupant who campaigned on the state of IL’s expense.


271 posted on 07/03/2009 9:04:01 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 ("If you think healthcare is expensive now, just wait till it is free! "~ PJ O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Especially when the problem is a bunch of lowlife, Chicago scumbag thugs bent on the total destruction of anyone who does not kneel and kiss their feet.


272 posted on 07/03/2009 9:05:46 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Hey America! How's that "hope and change" thing working out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist

All I asked was whether she could be counted on to finish out her first term as President. I think it’s a fair question. If you have so much personal baggage that you can’t handle being governor, how will you handle being POTUS?


273 posted on 07/03/2009 9:06:21 PM PDT by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

Trolls are out in force tonight, I see.

Lots of Romney bots signed up today. Figures...


274 posted on 07/03/2009 9:12:26 PM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

“She’ll make millions on a speaking tour.”

Thank you for this, and you can bet your sweet bippy that when you said “she will make millions”, you of course mean money and converts to the Conservative Cause.

Mahalo and lets all get out there tomorrow for a great 4th of July Tea Party.


275 posted on 07/03/2009 9:14:15 PM PDT by Islander2 (Abort Planned Parenthood and other abortuaries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

“The American people are beyond having the freedom to pick.”

“Voted for Buchanan in the 1992 and 1996 primaries”

...Theodore R.

I see lol.


276 posted on 07/03/2009 9:17:54 PM PDT by rbmillerjr ("We Are All Socialists Now"........not me, not now, not ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The going got tough in terms of spurious ethics charges against her, and she took off. That’s cowardly. That’s not sign of staying power.

Not true. There were 15 cases charged against her and she fought them all and won all of them.

277 posted on 07/03/2009 9:19:58 PM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaggieCarta

Ding! Ding! I think Dick Morris nails it:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2285261/posts?page=1


278 posted on 07/03/2009 9:20:06 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Obama Administration is a blueprint for Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
...and your pick is....?

Governor C.L. Otter. With a running mate of either Huck or Romney. How do you like me now?

279 posted on 07/03/2009 9:21:07 PM PDT by AH_LiveRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Pretty one-dimensional thinking from Mr. Morrissey. Palin is moving her fight to guerrilla tactics, away from conventional warfare.


280 posted on 07/03/2009 9:21:57 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 341-351 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson