Posted on 07/03/2009 6:02:41 AM PDT by reaganaut1
Wherever Jim Hansen is right now -- whatever speech the "censored" NASA scientist is giving -- perhaps he'll find time to mention the plight of Alan Carlin. Though don't count on it.
Mr. Hansen, as everyone in this solar system knows, is the director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies. Starting in 2004, he launched a campaign against the Bush administration, claiming it was censoring his global-warming thoughts and fiddling with the science. It was all a bit of a hoot, given Mr. Hansen was already a world-famous devotee of the theory of man-made global warming, a reputation earned with some 1,400 speeches he'd given, many while working for Mr. Bush. But it gave Democrats a fun talking point, one the Obama team later picked up.
So much so that one of President Barack Obama's first acts was a memo to agencies demanding new transparency in government, and science. The nominee to head the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Lisa Jackson, joined in, exclaiming, "As administrator, I will ensure EPA's efforts to address the environmental crises of today are rooted in three fundamental values: science-based policies and program, adherence to the rule of law, and overwhelming transparency." In case anyone missed the point, Mr. Obama took another shot at his predecessors in April, vowing that "the days of science taking a backseat to ideology are over."
Except, that is, when it comes to Mr. Carlin, a senior analyst in the EPA's National Center for Environmental Economics and a 35-year veteran of the agency. In March, the Obama EPA prepared to engage the global-warming debate in an astounding new way, by issuing an "endangerment" finding on carbon. It establishes that carbon is a pollutant, and thereby gives the EPA the authority to regulate it -- even if Congress doesn't act.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
global warming ping
Thought police.
Stalin would be proud.
Pray for America
Obama, like Clinton, made many promises yet kept few.
Remember the press being astounded at Bush keeping his promises?
Why is this such an easy lesson for us to know, but one most Americans forget?
They ARE the establishment.
And they're the biggest more intolerant bullies this country has ever had as an establishment.
Mr. Carlin, has shone a light on what many already knew. They have been hiding much of the skeptical evedince. He doesn’t think carbon is the reason as his graphs prove it is not. In 2006, we were told it was the hottest summer on record. We found out later that was not true it was the 5th hottest. Yes, NASA had collected temps at different time of the day. That little mistake had changed the data. Skewed it to fit their model. In 2008, they went back and refigured when the error had been noticed. That however, was not greeted with the same fanfare. It went unpublicized no mention in the media. Why? It dispells fear mongering, which what this religion is based upon.
I heard a comment from someone about artic ice. I heard that same comment about antartic ice except that wasn’t entirely true. The Wilkins Shelf which is 1/4 the size of the Ross Sea had some melting, but that was at a normal rate. The Ross Sea region is cooling, and expanding as we write. You hear about the Polar Bears, but one of the foremost experts was barred from speaking. He was going to say in Copenhagen, that Polar Bear populations are increasing. That there might be warming, but carbon has nothing to do with this. It is more likely to be a product of oceans, and winds across the continent.
The one thing you can blow a giant hole in all Global Warming Theory. Where is the hot spot in the upper atmosphere that should be there if this were happening. That was what they pointed to as proof. It is not there and no amount of BS can say it is!
Why can’t Jim Hanson go back to doing what he always did best:
BOSSING THE MUPPETS!!
I’ve seen his paper and I’m pretty sure he’s moved on since then. At the very least, he wants an honest assessment of the actual science, something vary rare in official circles, witness the hatchet job being done on him now.
Can you please link me to an article about your topic! The polar ice cap and the polar bears have been chief in my discussions with several I am trying to convince to take another look at the global warming ....scam.
Thank you very much.
I will have to look where I found the article but I believe it was a british paper.
That’s it! Thank you very much!
As we know, the debate is over, the science is settled — we have moved to solutions enforcement strategies now.
See this tidbit from W.H.O. and their Healthy Planet team:
“There is also evidence that the health sector’s energy use and resulting toxic emissions undermine the health of the very communities the sector is meant to serve. On the basis of estimates
by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the United States health sector’s 73 billion kWh “conventional”
electricity use adds over US$ 600 million per year in increased health costs – including increases in asthma, respiratory
illness and hospital emergency department visits. In addition,
the United States health sector’s 341 trillion BTUs (or British thermal units) for heat and cooling contributes to even more polluting emissions, adding billions of dollars more in health-care bills and hundreds of billions more in indirect costs to society.”
your welcome!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
