If you can’t get the numbers you want, you change the way you get the numbers. Sounds like a SHELL game. I know I have been going through this the last 15 years. You can not make MONEY if the numbers are to low.
Exactly. If you do some research, you'll see that they've recently lowered the numbers and now that allows them to give you a diagnose of a "high sugar" reading from that lowered threshold.
I think I also read somewhere that Canada uses a different threshhold.
I don't trust any of them.
You are, of course, free to be suspicious but more than half the diabetics in the country have not yet been diagnosed so the doctors should easily make up for you absence.
Apparently you did not read the article. The piece describes how different tests results can be interpreted to make a reasonable determination of a threshold.
The A1C has been used as a reliable indicator by my doctor as a reinforcing factor. This piece now reverses the order. The A1C becomes primary with the sugar level as a solid backup.