To: crazyotto
"If you can’t get the numbers you want, you change the way you get the numbers. Sounds like a SHELL game. I know I have been going through this the last 15 years. You can not make MONEY if the numbers are to low." Exactly. If you do some research, you'll see that they've recently lowered the numbers and now that allows them to give you a diagnose of a "high sugar" reading from that lowered threshold.
I think I also read somewhere that Canada uses a different threshhold.
I don't trust any of them.
7 posted on
07/02/2009 5:01:09 AM PDT by
Matchett-PI
(Obama has entered the "cracking stage" of his presidency. ~ Gagdad)
To: Matchett-PI
Do you know your A!C level?
Has it been determined?
If not, you are likely not at risk
10 posted on
07/02/2009 5:11:08 AM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . The boy's war in Detriot has already cost more then the war in Iraq.)
To: Matchett-PI
If you do some research, you'll see that they've recently lowered the numbers and now that allows them to give you a diagnose of a "high sugar" reading from that lowered threshold. As a result; they can dupe even more people into consuming even MORE high-priced 'medication'. Quit eating garbage, America...bye-bye, Type 2.
33 posted on
07/05/2009 8:46:07 AM PDT by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: Matchett-PI
They lowered the number to 6 because damage begins to happen to the body if the numbers tun over 6.5 for very long. How is more research a bad thing?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson