Posted on 07/01/2009 5:22:07 PM PDT by Maelstorm
Editor's note: The content of this story is graphic in nature and may be objectionable to some readers.
Frank Lombard
News coverage of a Duke University official accused of raping his adopted 5-year-old son and offering the child to someone else is apparently lacking what some say is a key piece of information: the fact the alleged perpetrator is a homosexual who lives with another "gay" man.
Frank Lombard, associate director of the Health Inequalities Program at the university's Center for Health Policy, was arrested last Wednesday in Raleigh, N.C., for attempting to induce someone to cross state lines to engage in sex with the child, who is black.
The arrest affidavit goes into graphic detail of Lombard's alleged actions, including alleged performance of oral sex with the child in front of a webcam, and sodomizing the boy with his finger and tongue.
In his online profile, Lombard reportedly describes himself as "perv dad for fun."
But days after the case broke, there have been few, if any, mentions in news stories that Lombard is part of a homosexual couple raising children.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I’m no fan of Obama, but this claim is absurd. It makes principled opponents of the Obama agenda look bad.
GEESH!
it isn't rocket science!
Perversion doesn't have AGE as a boundary.
Tell that to O’Reilly too!
He defends GAYS.
If anyone on the right does anything the MSM blames every single one of us.
It's called being painted with the same broad brush.
I wonder if Janet Napolitano and her team rape 5 year old black children - or offer them for sale. They are - after all - all liberals.
> “I tried to contact Frank Lombard over the weekend to probe his expertise regarding the health benefits of raping small children,” wrote Adams. “So far, he’s declined to comment.”
That sums it up well.
And they were such sure picks for the “Personal Bitc* of the leaders of the mid east team.
He’ll keep them on his short list for whenever they are released from prison.
I don’t believe homosexuals of either gender should be allowed to adopt kids. However, I don’t think lesbian adopters are sexually dangerous to their adopted children. To me, it’s obvious that gay men — not gay women — have disordered, uncontrollable sexual appetites and are sexually drawn to young boys.
I'm also surprised the Civil Rights activists have not objected to a white man offering a black child "for sale" on the internet for adult men to rape ...
All I hear is crickets...
It sure does. And the title of this thread is not even the title of the story at the link provided.It is: "News agencies gagging 'gay' factor in boy rape". Nor did I see an 'expert' quoted anywhere in the story who made the ridiculous charge that Obama was responsible for this man's horrific crimes. What gives?
I agree with you that lesbians should not be allowed to adopt kids. I agree with you also as to the reasons. My point was just that male homosexuals are much, much more likely to sexually abuse children than lesbians are. I am not making a case for lesbian parents! I just object when the media gloss over sexual differences between men and women, including between homosexual men and women.
While lesbains may not be a danger to their children sexually, nothing would convince me they are not a danger to their children’s sexuality.
I just realized - all the civil rights leaders are out in Neverland celebrating the life of the KING of PEDOPHILES - Michael (I pay the kids off) Jackson.
Again, I agree with you. My point was that gay men are more DIRECTLY sexually dangerous to children than lesbians are. My point and yours are not in conflict.
The commonality is that liberals do not believe in God and the Truth....they do not care if they kill children, so what is the big deal about rape????
Liberals back gay couple adoption, so children can be seduced into the gay lifestyle and used for their own selfish purposes. They care only about themselves and nothing for the health and welfare of the children. If they did, they would set up government to make sure that children have a right to both a biological mother and father and encourage that in all schools and programs.
It is what produces a HEALTHY society....both physically and emotionally.
“I’m no fan of Obama, but this claim is absurd.”
What claim is that? That the media is ignoring this story.
“It makes principled opponents of the Obama agenda look bad.”
Look bad? The story is talking about selling his kid for rape and you worry about opponents of Obama looking bad?
“Again, I agree with you. My point was that gay men are more DIRECTLY sexually dangerous to children than lesbians are. My point and yours are not in conflict.”
There have been numerous cases recently of lesbians killing their little babys. Mutilation, beating, starvation.
Do you really think I am arguing that lesbians pose no danger to children?! I am asserting that, IN GENERAL, more male homosexuals than lesbians abuse children. If you heard someone say that it rains more in Seattle than in Chicago, would you respond, “It does so rain in Chicago!� You keep challenging an argument that I have NOT been making.
I was doing a turnabouts fair play - but you make a point. When they do it - they mean it. Crazy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.