Posted on 06/23/2009 11:47:26 AM PDT by AJKauf
Lets review the bidding, shall we? The election circus took place a week ago Friday, and demonstrations began that night, June 12th. Ten days have passed. What have we learned?
First, that a significant number of Iranians hate the regime and are prepared to die to bring it down;
Second, that the fanatical religious zealots that hold the guns, chains, knives, tear gas cannisters, high-powered water hoses, sniper rifles and (perhaps) chemical weapons (said by some to have been deployed from helicopters), are prepared to order the killing of any number of Iranians in order to maintain their own power and preserve the Islamic Republic;
Third, that women are playing a key role in the insurrection (a central element of any good analysis of events in Iran, which is invariably overlooked, even by some outstanding scholars)....
(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...
N-th. Bring guns.
1) Don’t ever let the gov’t disarm the citizens.
2) Yes, this CAN happen here.
Voices and signs mean nothing when the government you are protesting has guns and not afraid to use them against you.
Solution, come heavy or not at all
A revolution is not a dinner party.
The article asked — What have we learned?
—
Well, I can say what I know and also, what I hope that others have learned.
I know that electing one Muslim terrorist is as good as electing another Muslim terrorist...
It makes no difference...
One more lesson for the World: As long as Baraq Hussein 0bama sits in the White House, don't count on the US for anything, even moral support!
You said — The revolution in Iran is over. The fire is gone and the will has faded. They populace will return to whatever life they had before. The RG will search out leaders and they will be tried and executed. Next story please.
—
As long as those 98% of the population in Iran continue to adhere to the false and evil religion and government idealogy (being one and the same...), they’ll simply elect one Muslilm terrorist or another Muslim terrorist for their leader.
There will never be anything different there in Iran as long as they continue agreeing to be subjects of *Islam*...
The key is not “elections” — because Muslims continue election Muslim terrorists for leaders. The key is *dumping* Islam in the first place.
Pretty simple.
We riot and get upset when the Lakers win the title.
We aren’t upset by the Trillions pumped out by the Fed and wasted by the Gov’t under the Republicans and Democrats.
Yet, Iran has an election and the people cry out.
We are the losers.
So..., he’s supposed to be upset that the *other* Muslim terrorist candidate didn’t get elected... LOL...
Heres your other Muslim terrorist candidate...
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Mousavi
Iranian reformist may seem moderate but his history is one of a radical sympathizer of the ayatollahs regime. Can a leopard really change its spots?
Smadar Peri
Published: 06.18.09, 14:22 / Israel News
Reformist Iranian leader Mir-Hossein Mousavi, with his sleek, striped shirts and overall serene demeanor, may seem like the nuclear threat-wary Wests wildest dream, but a closer look into the mans past reveals a darker image, of a man who was a radical sympathizer of the ayatollahs.
Mousavi (67), who became Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejads main political rival during the last presidential race, is an architect by training, an amateur artist and a would-be poet, who has penned dozens of romantic songs.
His presidential campaign focused on problems rooted within the Islamic Republic: He pledged to improve the status of women, fight unemployment, poverty and the younger generations disconcerting affection for drugs, and he vowed that change will come.
His resume, however, depicts an extremist a man who is not so different than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
[ ... ]
at http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3733426,00.html
“Solution, come heavy or not at all”
Can I get an AMEN!
Solution, come heavy or not at all
Irregardless of what anyone thinks of the theology of David Koresh, the Branch Davidians were the canary in the coal mine.
The hills will have more than eyes as the “next Waco” unfolds.
Once again you prove your own ineptness.
This is not about picking Mousavi over Ahmadinejad.
It is about the uprising against the whole corrupt theocratic regime in Iran.
0bama has chosen the side of the Mullahs, not the Iranian People.
And it looks like you’ve chosen the side of 0bama.
There’ll be an uprising here soon, if Obanaga keeps pushing us!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.