Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Admits Possible Discrepancy in 3 Million Votes
New York Times ^ | June 22, 2009 | Nazila Fathi and Michael Slackman

Posted on 06/22/2009 4:40:46 AM PDT by Loyalist

TEHRAN — Locked in a continuing bitter contest Monday with Iranians who say the presidential elections were rigged, the authorities here acknowledged that the number of votes cast in 50 cities exceeded the actual number of voters, state television reported following assertions by the country’s supreme leader that the ballot was fair.

But the authorities insisted that discrepancies, which could affect three million votes, did not violate Iranian law and the country’s influential Guardian Council said it was not clear whether they would decisively change the election result.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: election; iran; iranviolence2009; rigthevote
More votes cast than actual voters?

You'd think this was an election in Chicago!

1 posted on 06/22/2009 4:40:46 AM PDT by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Acorn in Iran too?


2 posted on 06/22/2009 4:43:53 AM PDT by mtngrandpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtngrandpa

beat me by that much


3 posted on 06/22/2009 4:46:50 AM PDT by bikerman (Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
You'd think this was an election in Chicago!

Or any place that is historically dominated by Democrats. Does anyone remember the infamous Tammany Society that dominated New York City politics for over a century?

4 posted on 06/22/2009 4:51:40 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Exactly Loyalist,
Chicago and a whole lot more places here in the U.S. had rigged elections.
Should think before being too critical of Irans election, not too much more malfeasance than here.


5 posted on 06/22/2009 5:03:13 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

If there was a true domination, I wouldn’t think phantom votes would be needed.


6 posted on 06/22/2009 5:14:05 AM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
That won't even come close to covering the discrepancy.
7 posted on 06/22/2009 5:18:53 AM PDT by wolfcreek (KMTEXASA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

What about the many tens of millions of votes that weren’t cast at all, because all of the candidates were pre-approved by the ruling elite?


8 posted on 06/22/2009 5:45:27 AM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

“But the authorities insisted that discrepancies, which could affect three million votes, did not violate Iranian law and the country’s influential Guardian Council said it was not clear whether they would decisively change the election result.”

I don’t see what the problem is. Apparently stealing elections by voter fraud is not illegal in Iran. Voter fraud took place, the election was stolen.

Let’s move on. Nothing to see here.


9 posted on 06/22/2009 6:11:47 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Climate change alarmists are Warm-Mongers. Now that's funny right there. I don't care who you are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

Chicago? Don’t forget Detroit and Philadelphia. Because of what happened in 2000 though, most associate election fraud and stealing with Republicans. Ridiculous.


10 posted on 06/22/2009 6:20:08 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

TNCMAXQ
How are elections in Connecticut?
Here in Florida you quite obviously are aware of just how pathetic they can be after 2000 and G.W. Bush vs. algore.


11 posted on 06/22/2009 6:38:17 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Their next leader will be Al F’n Frankin.


12 posted on 06/22/2009 7:26:11 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB
Their next leader will be Al F’n Frankin.

Well, gotta hand it to them, ACORN has gone world wide. The mullah's should have turned off AVS on their donation page, would have received millions from supporters here in the US ...
13 posted on 06/22/2009 7:28:48 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Goes to show you, without Jimmah Carter keeping an eagle eye, election fraud reigns!


14 posted on 06/22/2009 7:30:27 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Iran election turnouts exceeded 100% in 30 towns. Taft, a town in the central province of Yazd, had a turnout of 141%, Kouhrang, in Chahar Mahaal Bakhtiari province, recorded a 132% turnout while Chadegan, in Isfahan province, had 120%.

At least 200 polling stations across Iran had participation rates of 95% or above.

Kamran Daneshjou, the head of the ministry’s election commission has attributed the reported 141% participation in the town of Taft to the good weather in Yazd province, where the town is situated.

15 posted on 06/22/2009 8:42:31 AM PDT by gandalftb (An appeaser feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson