Posted on 06/21/2009 8:46:25 AM PDT by fiscon1
Her name was Neda, which means voice in Farsi. According to numerous online accounts picked up by media outlets worldwide, she was shot in the streets by Iranian state police while protesting today. This is what repression looks (warning: graphic):
(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...
>>Photo of the year.<<
Pitifully, not here.
The Photo of the Year will be the Obama Ice Cream Photo.
:-(
Mousavi was a hard-core hardliner in the 80s; back when we were actually in a shooting war with Iran over tanker access through the Straits of Hormuz.
And he's made a very nice living at it.
“Like I (and Pat Buchanan!!) said before, if Zero gave over the top support for Mousavi, it would suck the life (perhaps literally) out of him and the protestors”
So then you are actually in FAVOR of intenrvetion, and this is just your tactic to assist the resistance! Ohhh i get it now,, earlier you said the founders would have never even cared what happened in Iran. But u really meant that *actually* they would have used strategery of ignoring the resistance, to *help* the resistance,,,
Yep, or Bo the water dog eating ice cream treats obama bought for him as Neda bled out. That girl had more courage than obama EVER will understand.
If there are any, they have been drowned out by his insults of other FReepers and of conservatives in general.
You realize that Mousavi is nothing more than a kinder and gentler Ahmadinejad right.
Even if that were true (which I haven't verified to my satisfaction yet), that doesn't detract from the facts on the ground that Ahmadinejad and his followers are gunning down peaceful protestors to cement in place the results of a probably fraudulent election.
By your logic, we ought to support Obama, since John McCain just said he is doing a good job as President.
Cheers!
Exactly, and I pointed this out on several other threads. So basically, the Iranians are just protesting to have their chains loosened a bit.
I think the world is ready for even a slightly kinder and gentler ahmadinejad. WTH, let’s go with the devil we don’t know.
Besides, once the Iranians get the hang of actually getting who they elect, they can work to get better candidates next time.
MEK was founded in 1963 by a group of college-educated Iranian leftistssupporters of Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadeqopposed to the countrys pro-Western ruler, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The group participated in the 1979 Islamic revolution that replaced the shah with a Shiite Islamist regime led by the Ayatollah Khomeini. But MEKs ideology, a blend of Marxism, feminism, and Islamism, put it at odds with the post-revolutionary government, and its original leadership was soon executed by the Khomeini regime. In 1981, the group was driven from its bases on the Iran-Iraq border and resettled in Paris, where it began supporting Iraq in its eight-year war against Khomeinis Iran. In 1986, after France recognized the Iranian regime, MEK moved its headquarters to Iraq, which used MEK to harass neighboring Iran. MEK maintained its headquarters in Iraq until the American invasion in 2003 when many members surrendered their weapons. http://www.cfr.org/publication/9158/
MEK is the group organizing this "revolt".
—So then you are actually in FAVOR of intenrvetion, and this is just your tactic to assist the resistance!—
It would be all well and good for the Iranian people (and perhaps the world at large) if a more humane and forward-looking regime came to power. But it is UP TO THEM (the Iranians); it is not up to the United States. Ignoring the “resistance” might or might not help it, but boisterous support that would lable the “resistance” “Made in the USA” would certainly injure it. Clear now?
That photo of that black bastard Obama sucking on his white ice cream cone laughing and grinning and having a good time while at the exact same time the media is presenting the bloody pictures of the pawns that he set in motion with his speech in Iranin bleeding and dying as they struggle to come out of their enburkenated nightmares, just makes me really sick. What a demon.
Linguistics are not your strong suit, are they? That’s not Hebrew, it’s Greek, and it means “Come and Take Them” (a taunt, I believe, uttered by the Spartan warrior king Leondias to the Persians at Thermopylae).
And you inderstand the Mullahs and their theocracy is every bit as targeted as Ahmandinejad,,, don’t you?
Let me see:
Innocent women being gunned down to die in the streets...check.
Thugs being imported from other countries...check.
People's homes being raided in the middle of the night...check.
Yep, sounds like the resistance is gaining all kinds of legitimacy now that it is not associated with the U.S.
And you might note, that in that part of the world, the U.S. and Israel get blamed for everthing, whether they are involved or not.
Cheers!
If you are so worried about, why don’t you go there and help out!
Well, insults and name-calling are pretty much the par for course here. You've been here 5 years you should know that already.
Even if that were true (which I haven't verified to my satisfaction yet),
So you didn't know Mousavi was actually the Iranian PM in the 1980s and was probably a bigger bad-ass than Ahmadinejad is now. Pitiful.
that doesn't detract from the facts on the ground that Ahmadinejad and his followers are gunning down peaceful protestors to cement in place the results of a probably fraudulent election.
No, it doesn't. But you have to look at the bigger picture though. The President of Iran is just a figurehead; the Ayatollah holds the real power. Had Mousavi won, he'd still would have called for the destruction of Israel and antagonized the West anyway, albeit with a smiley face.
By your logic, we ought to support Obama, since John McCain just said he is doing a good job as President.
No, I'm saying it's best to let events play out in Iran on its own.
Amen!
I can improve my linguistics, But you’ll still be a PBJ loving, Ron Paul following Jew hater.
They hold the real power in Iran. The President of Iran is just a figurehead. Even if an Iranian version of Reagan would have been elected, I doubt there would be significant changes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.