Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dissecting the Kennedy Health Bill (No, you WON'T be able to keep your plan if you like it)
The Wall Street Journal ^ | June 19, 2009 | Betsy McCaughey

Posted on 06/18/2009 8:54:59 PM PDT by St. Louis Conservative

Last September Sen. Barack Obama promised that under his health-care proposal "you'll be able to get the same kind of coverage that members of Congress give themselves." On Monday, President Obama repeated that promise in a speech to the American Medical Association. It's not true.

The president is barnstorming the nation, urging swift approval of legislation that is taking shape in Congress. This legislation -- the Affordable Health Choices Act that's being drafted by Sen. Edward Kennedy's staff and the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee -- will push Americans into stingy insurance plans with tight, HMO-style controls. It specifically exempts members of Congress (along with federal employees; the exemptions are in section 3116).

Members of Congress "enjoy the widest selection of health plans in the country," according to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. They "can choose from among consumer-driven and high deductible plans that offer catastrophic risk protection with higher deductibles, health saving/reimbursable accounts and lower premiums, or fee-for-service (FFS) plans, and their preferred provider organizations (PPO), or health maintenance organizations (HMO)." These choices would be nice for all of us, but they're not in the offing. Instead, if you don't enroll in a "qualified" health plan and submit proof of enrollment to the federal government, you'll be tracked down and fined (sections 3101 and 6055).

For a health plan to count as "qualified," it has to meet all the restrictions listed in the legislation and whatever criteria the Secretary of Health and Human Services imposes after the bill becomes law. You may think you're in a "qualified" plan, but the language suggests that only plans with managed-care controls such as the "medical home" will meet the definition (sections 3101 and 2707).

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bhohealthcare; healthcare; insurance; kennedy; obama; tedkennedy

1 posted on 06/18/2009 8:55:00 PM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Not to worry, really. You will all become government employees due to Obama’s takeover of every single business in American. As for Congress continuing to have a choice of plans, sorry, but O will put Aetna, Blue Shield out of business. Blue Cross will continue to administer Medicare and the public plan, but they will have layoffs in the thousands as well. It will increase unemployment so I am not sure just where they are going to get the money to pay for so many who are not working or working for an entity (the government) that produces not one dime of it’s own.


2 posted on 06/18/2009 9:06:52 PM PDT by Semperfiwife (It is a tale, told by an idiot.....living in DC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Dear Democrats, don’t tell Obama what comes after a trillion.


3 posted on 06/18/2009 9:15:09 PM PDT by Mark (Don't argue with my posts. I typed while under sniper fire..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semperfiwife

As with Chrysler, not all MDs will be invited to participate with approved provider groups. Many solo and small group surgical specialists will be left out and will experience draconian drops in income, stimulating a reduction of their numbers in practice.


4 posted on 06/18/2009 9:21:12 PM PDT by givemELL (Does Taiwan Meet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"? by Richar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: givemELL

The Kennedy Health Care bill does not need dissection. It needs burial.


5 posted on 06/18/2009 9:25:54 PM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All; St. Louis Conservative

Call your U.S. senators, and write a letter to the editor explaining the lies. We must stop this.


6 posted on 06/18/2009 9:53:42 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Kennedy health care plan:

A poke in the eye with a sharp stick


7 posted on 06/18/2009 10:04:46 PM PDT by This_far
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semperfiwife

For federal employees, the government pays 60% of the premium for Blue Cross,-Blue Shield. and I pay 40%, family option. Since I turned 65, Medicare is now primary and the private plan is secondary. Before there was a “deductble for each family member that had to be paid before benefits kicked in. My wife and I keep close records, but we can’t figure out what deal the medical providers have with either the government or Blue Cross-Blue Shield. We have major procedures that are above what Medicare and Blue-Cross-Blue Shield allow (on paper), but then we owe nothing. We figure that it is a bit like charges for clothing: Huge mark-ups, big discounts, and fictious loses applied against taxes. But who knows. Nothing like it was in 1965, where we paid $20 a night for a private room in a community hospital, and after weeks in hospital, a small ins policy paid for his hospital and our only expense was $300 to our family dollar. That would be about $2000 in todays dollars.

Somewhere along the line things got out of hand. Our family doctor was strongly against medicare, and he correctly prodicted thatthe numbers that Kennedy and others were throwing around were impossibly low. he predicted—accurately—that when government started pumping money into the system that prices would go sky-high, and that a British style system would take the place of the once we knew. He was wrong only in that he said it would happen in 20 years. It has taken 40.


8 posted on 06/18/2009 10:12:58 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
This legislation -- the Affordable Health Choices Act that's being drafted by Sen. Edward Kennedy's staff and the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee -- will push Americans into stingy insurance plans with tight, HMO-style controls.

When I think of Kennedy work on this, I just have to laugh. Just think, we have someone making life altering decisions for generations of Americans, who's brain is being destroyed by cancer and who's treatment, most likely, includes mind altering drugs. Strange how I have to undergo drug testing for my job, and Teddy, with far more effect on the lives of others, doesn't. The world has turned upside down.

9 posted on 06/18/2009 10:35:57 PM PDT by Razz Barry (Round'em up, send'em home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
It specifically exempts members of Congress (along with federal employees; the exemptions are in section 3116).

In. Your. Face.

10 posted on 06/19/2009 1:24:17 AM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

and, the unions are already insisting that only non-union members be taxed on said ‘benefits’.


11 posted on 06/19/2009 1:53:59 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson