Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored
Terrible. This is not justice. Justice would be to make her pay for the songs and sign an agreement not to do it again. Then if she violates that then assess fines. This is ridiculous.
7 posted on 06/18/2009 6:35:32 PM PDT by pray4liberty (http://www.foundersvalues.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pray4liberty
> Terrible. This is not justice.... This is ridiculous.

The RIAA is trying to make up for years of stupidity (on their own part) for not recognizing a decade ago that the business model had to change.

Damn parasites, they sit between the creative artists and the eager listeners, reaping windfall after windfall for years with overpriced CDs, and they bitch when it falls apart.... they COULD have responded reasonably years ago, but now all they can do is squeeze anybody they catch.

Don'tcha know, their coke spoons are getting tarnished... they have to make their middleman cut...

17 posted on 06/18/2009 6:40:16 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: pray4liberty

I disagree with the amount but also with you. The punishment for a crime is not simple restitution lets say someone downloaded 100 songs that would have gotten one hundred dollars the less than an hour of good attorney fees..

20 times the value of the song, or a min of 20,000$ for all songs which ever is greater..


182 posted on 07/20/2009 9:44:27 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson