Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reagandemocrat
Does Obama's appointment of his sister or half-sister or whatever she is, violate the federal anti-nepotism statute?

see http://uscode.house.gov/uscode-cgi/fastweb.exe?getdoc+uscview+t05t08+208+0++()%20%20AN

5 USC Sec. 3110 01/08/2008 -EXPCITE- TITLE 5 - GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES PART III - EMPLOYEES Subpart B - Employment and Retention CHAPTER 31 - AUTHORITY FOR EMPLOYMENT SUBCHAPTER I - EMPLOYMENT AUTHORITIES -HEAD- Sec. 3110. Employment of relatives; restrictions -STATUTE- (a) For the purpose of this section - (1) agency means - (A) an Executive agency; (B) an office, agency, or other establishment in the legislative branch; (C) an office, agency, or other establishment in the judicial branch; and (D) the government of the District of Columbia; (2) "public official" means an officer (including the President and a Member of Congress), a member of the uniformed service, an employee and any other individual, in whom is vested the authority by law, rule, or regulation, or to whom the authority has been delegated, to appoint, employ, promote, or advance individuals, or to recommend individuals for appointment, employment, promotion, or advancement in connection with employment in an agency; and (3) "relative" means, with respect to a public official, an individual who is related to the public official as father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in- law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, or half sister. (b) A public official may not appoint, employ, promote, advance, or advocate for appointment, employment, promotion, or advancement, in or to a civilian position in the agency in which he is serving or over which he exercises jurisdiction or control any individual who is a relative of the public official. An individual may not be appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced in or to a civilian position in an agency if such appointment, employment, promotion, or advancement has been advocated by a public official, serving in or exercising jurisdiction or control over the agency, who is a relative of the individual. (c) An individual appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced in violation of this section is not entitled to pay, and money may not be paid from the Treasury as pay to an individual so appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced. (d) The Office of Personnel Management may prescribe regulations authorizing the temporary employment, in the event of emergencies resulting from natural disasters or similar unforeseen events or circumstances, of individuals whose employment would otherwise be prohibited by this section. (e) This section shall not be construed to prohibit the appointment of an individual who is a preference eligible in any case in which the passing over of that individual on a certificate of eligibles furnished under section 3317(a) of this title will result in the selection for appointment of an individual who is not a preference eligible.

12 posted on 06/18/2009 11:25:07 AM PDT by AJFavish (www.allanfavish.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AJFavish

Nice find. Indeed, 5 U.S.C. §3110 was passed in 1967, a seemingly direct response to the Kennedy clan’s familiar power-play.


16 posted on 06/18/2009 11:39:53 AM PDT by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

>>>Does Obama’s appointment of his sister or half-sister or whatever she is, violate the federal anti-nepotism statute?<<<

Yes. It’s embarrassing that an Obama official doesn’t know this.


21 posted on 06/18/2009 11:56:46 AM PDT by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

That is a good catch. I wonder if Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Bill O’Reilly are aware?


23 posted on 06/18/2009 12:05:11 PM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish
How did Clinton circumnavigate this statute by appointing Hitlery to head his health care task force?
25 posted on 06/18/2009 12:10:27 PM PDT by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish
Does Obama's appointment of his sister or half-sister or whatever she is, violate the federal anti-nepotism statute?

Rules? He don't need no stinking rules! He's THE ONE!

Worship, follow or get out of the way!

28 posted on 06/18/2009 12:45:13 PM PDT by mort56 (He who would sacrifice freedom for security deserves neither. - Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Well done, sir.

I’ve sent a message to my Senators asking if this is a violation of that statute.


30 posted on 06/18/2009 12:54:00 PM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson