Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9

It’s one of the rhetorical devices I use when discussing the abortion issue with a pro-abort.

No matter what extreme situation they bring up to justify abortion, I’ll tell them I’ll accept that if all others are prohibited.

Finally they get down to arguing for abortion for all the indefensible reasons.


21 posted on 06/16/2009 2:02:48 PM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

Is there a home-kit test for black, Jewish, female, Chinese babies?


23 posted on 06/16/2009 2:35:23 PM PDT by mbarker12474 (If thine enemy offend thee, give his childe a drum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: MrB

I think I’m having deja vu here. I once said to another FReeper that I might be willing to conceede abortions for all pregnancies that are the result of rape or incest (that’s something like 1.5% of all abortions) if liberals would allow the rest to be outlawed (I don’t consider terminating a pregnancy that is going to kill the mother an abortion). That would be in line with the position of the vast majority of the voting public. I recognize that the unborn children who resulted from acts of rape or incest are innocent and do not deserve the death penalty for another man’s crime. But think of the millions who would be saved. And imagine the abortionists who would be forced to close shop for lack of business. Only the largest cities could support an abortionist who only served rape or incest victims.


37 posted on 06/17/2009 2:05:31 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson