Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sikhs challenge US Army's ban on turbans, beards
Sacramento Bee ^ | June 14, 2009 | By DEEPTI HAJELA

Posted on 06/14/2009 8:57:35 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

NEW YORK -- Military service is in Capt. Kamaljit Singh Kalsi's blood. But his plans to go on active duty in July are now on hold. An Army policy from the 1980s that regulates the wearing of religious items would mean he would need to shave his beard and remove the turban he wears in accordance with his religious precepts.

Sikhs have a long history with the U.S. military, serving in World Wars I and II, the Korean and Vietnam wars, and in the Persian Gulf.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: sikhs; uniform; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
My better half used to work in the Chemical Corps, back in the day. She used to work on Johnston Atoll, inspecting and maintaining the chemical weapon stockpiles. She says that the issue pro-mask the Army uses is completely useless against most real agents, and that it's practically suicide to employ in real life. More of a 'feel good' device than a real protective measure. (They used full rubber suits with independent oxygen.)

So, I understand the 'beard won't work with pro-mask' argument, but that issue is almost a moot point.

61 posted on 06/14/2009 10:30:42 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (Oh, well. Back to the drawing board....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

“Sikhs were responsible for stopping the Islamification of India”

Anything that stops islam, i like. Islam was Americas first enemy. (besides England)


62 posted on 06/14/2009 10:31:54 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Or the Texans at the Alamo?

But with a somewhat worse ratio of forces than Crockett, Bowie and Travis faced.

63 posted on 06/14/2009 10:32:47 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

The Cav wearing uniform article directly related to US history is not at all the same thing. I meant it more like saying if you are Texan, can you wear a cowboy hat because it means sometining to you personally? Lke a Sihk with a turban.

It’s be un-American to hate the Cav.


64 posted on 06/14/2009 10:36:39 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Lose the headgear or leave the Army. End of discussion.


65 posted on 06/14/2009 10:37:20 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
So, I understand the 'beard won't work with pro-mask' argument, but that issue is almost a moot point.

Not really, masks are effective against many gases and are also used to prevent smoke inhalation in firefighting. Different masks provide different levels of protection, and can be used for biological as well as chemical situations. The military used many oxygen cannister type masks when I was in the USNR and I expect they still do.

66 posted on 06/14/2009 10:39:09 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
I don't know how they will be able to utilize proper headgear and gasmasks or maintain proper field hygiene.

The gas masks are probably an insoluble problem, but the hygiene seems to be part of their religion. They are to take the turban off, and comb the hair out, twice a day.

US special operations forces in Afghanistan: (SEALS I think)


67 posted on 06/14/2009 10:48:52 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

> US special operations forces in Afghanistan: (SEALS I think)

I understand that the SAS doesn’t shave or cut their hair when they are in the field — a tradition that goes back to their days as the Long Range Desert Unit in WW-II.


68 posted on 06/14/2009 10:53:09 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: C19fan; wardaddy

Our Sikhs are not in the British colonial army, or coming from that colonial tradition.

They are in the USA now, so follow USA laws and military customs.

Or don’t join. Better yet, go home to lovely wonderful Sikhlandia.


69 posted on 06/14/2009 11:01:04 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

I’m Scottish - why can’t I wear my kilt?
I’m Jamaican - why can’t I have dreadlocks?
I’m Jewish - why can’t I wear my yamaka (sp?)
I’m Japanese - I should get to carry my samuri sword
I’m Mexican - I want my sombrero
I’m Muslim - I shouldn’t have to ride in a vehicle with a woman

Why do we insist on wanting to bend or wills/regulations to satisy everyone? You join the army, you follow the rules. You didn’t get drafted.

I have 14 years in (MAJ US Army Aviation). I see no problems with the current uniform standards. Except the f*cking beret which I along with 90% of the army hate. But that’s another issue.


70 posted on 06/14/2009 11:19:38 AM PDT by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I fully support the Sikhs on this issue. The only value of uniformity is support logistics, and they are no great issue. The nonsense excuse of protective masks is just that. A large percentage of the male black soldiers in the military cannot use protective masks either because of a common facial skin condition.

Sikhs are generally fine soldiers. Theirs is a disciplined and militant religion of the entrepreneurial Indian middle class, they dominate the leadership roles of the Indian army, and they are loyal members of whatever army in which they serve. They have demonstrated remarkable performance in combat, lead orderly and polite lives, and are committed to doing the best job possible.

I would strongly caution against segregating Sikhs in their own units, because they provide both performance and leadership examples to any unit in which they serve.


71 posted on 06/14/2009 11:20:10 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Unclear on the concept of the word "uniform" -- one form.

Why would anyone in the military want to single themselves out from others? That would just make them a target.

-PJ

72 posted on 06/14/2009 11:27:55 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (This just in... Voting Republican is a Terrorist act!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Well this is the American Military and this is our Code NOT theirs .


73 posted on 06/14/2009 11:46:35 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

This is just sikh !......:o)


74 posted on 06/14/2009 11:51:43 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
They are actually protecting them...MOPP gear, gas masks, helmets will not work with a beard and turban. Consider also that without the new intelligent helmets a soldiers effectiveness drops considerably.

The right answer is for the Sikhs to accept *temporary* violation of some portion of the 5 Ks while actively serving.

75 posted on 06/14/2009 12:24:54 PM PDT by Starwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter
The only toy Kirpans I see are in school or other places where carrying a knife is banned. Most of the Sikhs I know keep them theirs fully functional.
76 posted on 06/14/2009 12:26:56 PM PDT by Starwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter
The Canadian Armed Forces are a joke. There are only 65,000 active duty personnel and the head of the Canadian Army has said that they will have to take a year off from operational duties because of Afghanistan.

How may Sikhs are in the Canadian Armed Forces?

77 posted on 06/14/2009 2:06:55 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
England did it as a way to reinforce to colonial troops that they were most assuredly not British. It wasnt that England was culturally sensitive. They were well aware that if they wore the standard British Army uniform, they would feel equal.

British military tradition is that a soldier is a member of and takes pride in a distinctive Regiment, rather than a standardized GI item supplied to a unit as required.

78 posted on 06/14/2009 5:35:47 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (a competent small government conservative is good enough for government work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kabar; fanfan; StarCMC

> The Canadian Armed Forces are a joke.

I can’t believe you said that. What a jerk.

The Canadian Army is paying the butcher’s bill in Afghanistan, and has from day one. They fight bravely and well, and unlike most of the rest of your allies they actually go into Harm’s Way and kill the enemy. Saying that they are “a joke” is in really bad taste.

I don’t think I have much more to say to you.


79 posted on 06/14/2009 7:39:56 PM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: strider44

> I’m Scottish - why can’t I wear my kilt?

The USMC has a very sharp kilt: their tartan pattern looks alot like the Macmillan Hunting tartan. Earn the right and you too could wear it.


80 posted on 06/14/2009 7:45:12 PM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson