Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington Post Campaigning for Democrat Candidate for Governor of Virginia
Me ^ | 06/09/2009 | Me

Posted on 06/09/2009 10:21:43 AM PDT by WaterBoard



These signs have been popping up all over northern Virginia.

I thought the press was not supposed to be biased nor actively campaigning for a particular candidate?


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 2009endorsements; deeds; mccauliffe; mcdonnell; va2009; virginia; washingtonpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 06/09/2009 10:21:43 AM PDT by WaterBoard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

In fairness, if I’m reading the sign correctly, it just says that the paper endorses him, and newspapers do that all the time. It’s not clear who paid for the sign.


2 posted on 06/09/2009 10:24:20 AM PDT by NRPM (America again in 2010!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard
Who paid for the signs? Did the Washington Post do it? Or (more likely) did Deeds use the Post's endorsement and print signs with the Post's name on them?
3 posted on 06/09/2009 10:24:24 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard
Signs states:

"The Washington Post
Endorses
Deeds
Democrat for Governor
Vote June 9th"

4 posted on 06/09/2009 10:24:27 AM PDT by WaterBoard (Somewhere a Village is Missing it's Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard
I thought the press was not supposed to be biased nor actively campaigning for a particular candidate?

*chuckle*
Good one.

5 posted on 06/09/2009 10:24:37 AM PDT by theDentist (qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard
"I thought the press was not supposed to be biased nor actively campaigning for a particular candidate?"

Never was the case. Never will be.

6 posted on 06/09/2009 10:25:16 AM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

I’m shocked I tell you — simply SHOCKED!!

(I fully realize that all sensible, thinking Americans — that’d be conservatives —fully understand this information. I post it only for the brain-dead Obama voters and statists — that’d be liberals — who might have slipped out of their rubber rooms over at DU and are lurking, hacking or generally causing trouble here at FR.)

Recently, I read what probably amounts to the obituary for the Atlanta Journal Constitution. (My wife insists on buying the Sunday edition for the TV guide.) It joins the growing list of print newspapers in deep, deep financial trouble. The LA Times, NY Times, Boston Globe, Cleveland Plain Dealer, etc.

Here’s my horseback analysis of why they’re heading for extinction.

As generally liberal statist propaganda outlets, they have for decades supported a government “education” system (and I used the term very loosely) dominated by the NEA and the idiot bureaucrats running the DOE in Washington. The unions and the NEA have largely hurled the traditional three “Rs” and critical thinking skills under the bus in favor of touchy-feely diversity training, self-esteem building, political correctness, African studies, teaching Hispanic kids in SPANISH instead of teaching them English on day one, social promotions, basket weaving, navel gazing, etc., etc.

I won’t dwell on it here but would, instead, refer you to my personal experience with the government schools here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0lR1KQq2-U

What I cannot grasp is precisely why, after effectively dumbing down the members of the American populace who have traversed the conveyor belt of mediocrity called government schools, the overeducated owners and operators of these newspapers are surprised that this population has lost its interest in READING NEWSPAPERS: Many of them CAN’T read!!

Those folks – especially conservatives who resent the increasingly liberal drivel found in the major papers — who can and DO read things are now getting their information from the Internet or, for those too busy to actually read, from largely conservative talk radio (which helps explain why Algore, Pelosi, Reid, et al feel the need to control both these formats).

Their statist dumbing down has produced huge numbers of voters who lacked the critical thinking skills necessary to determine that their present-voting, slick-talking liar of a candidate had virtually NO management or legislative experience. And the economic illiterates they have elevated to high office in Washington for years have produced a growing economic crisis which has even those with any money left spending it on “luxuries” like food, clothing and shelter. Newspapers and advertising therein are far down the list.

And did I mention that the economic collapse Obama “inherited” has its genesis in Jimmy Carter’s Community Reinvestment Act? It was then expanded by Clinton and stridently defended by Chris Dodd, Maxine Waters and Barney Frank (who was sleeping with Herb Moses while he held a top spot at – appropriately – Fannie). Only government could turn the dream of home ownership for poor folks into a NIGHTMARE for the rest of us.

Now that they have control of the White House and both houses of Congress, the liberals who run most of the newspapers here SHOULD be on a beach somewhere throwing a huge party. Instead, they are dusting off their resumes. The Editor of the AJC informed us that she was actively seeking to get more conservative/traditional values writers in the pages down there. I’d submit that it’s too little, too late!

Perhaps she’ll write and let us know if that “Hope” and “Change We Can Believe In” thing helps with the job search.

If you just have to have one of those 1,000 new jobs dunning folks for Tim Geithner’s IRS, it couldn’t hurt.


7 posted on 06/09/2009 10:25:24 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard
Newspapers can campaign for or endorse anyone they wish. This is a state election though, so don't expect anything like the fascist rules you find in McCain-Feingold.

As soon as the Washington Post figures out who's the most Jewish among the candidates, they'll start doing negative campaigning against him.

The campaigns in Virginia have gotten progressively dirtier and nastier every year, and particularly so during this period where we have two Democrat senators.

8 posted on 06/09/2009 10:25:28 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

I thought the press was not supposed to be biased nor actively campaigning for a particular candidate?

I take it you didn’t watch much TV last fall??


9 posted on 06/09/2009 10:25:29 AM PDT by skully (EEEWWW!! Who's carbon footprint do I smell ??!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

In fairness, I don’t know who paid for the signs or if the Washington Post did it as there is no indication available. I just noticed a large number of them this week.


10 posted on 06/09/2009 10:25:52 AM PDT by WaterBoard (Somewhere a Village is Missing it's Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

They would still have to do it with the permission of the paper.


11 posted on 06/09/2009 10:29:16 AM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard
In fairness, I don’t know who paid for the signs or if the Washington Post did it as there is no indication available. I just noticed a large number of them this week.

I think the signs should have some fine print on them, "Paid for by Committee to Elect Deeds," or some such thing.

12 posted on 06/09/2009 10:30:44 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

The signs were produced by the Deeds campaign and Deeds volunteers are putting them up.

Candidates run ads and send direct mail highlighting newspaper endorsements ALL THE TIME.

If you ask me, this is just a smart campaign tactic by a downstate moderate trying to build support among northern virginia liberals who respect the Washington Post.

I think newspaper endorsements are pointless and I always ignore them, but hey I’m not a democrat primary voter.

Nothing to see here.


13 posted on 06/09/2009 10:31:45 AM PDT by Nightbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard
Well, duh. What kind of candidate are they going to endorse in the DEMOCRATIC primary?
14 posted on 06/09/2009 10:32:09 AM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kempster
They would still have to do it with the permission of the paper.

Why? The signs are simply making a statement of fact -- the Washington Post endorsed this candidate in the Democratic primary. At most, the Post might object to the use of their distinctive logo, but even that is almost certainly fair use in this context.

15 posted on 06/09/2009 10:34:13 AM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

They singlehandedly destroyed George Allen. Nothing new here.


16 posted on 06/09/2009 10:34:17 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

I think the days of newpapers are so bad that if a candidate will pay for advertising they will do it. I would think they would advertise for a Republican if paid.


17 posted on 06/09/2009 10:37:09 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard
I thought the press was not supposed to be biased nor actively campaigning for a particular candidate?

BWAH HA HA HA HA HA. So when did you first come to America?

18 posted on 06/09/2009 10:37:42 AM PDT by Long Island Pete (Stupidity is in the DNA of liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Remind the last time the Washington Post endorsed a Republican in the Republican primary?


19 posted on 06/09/2009 10:40:51 AM PDT by WaterBoard (Somewhere a Village is Missing it's Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
In the endorsement The Post called Deeds "the best candidate for Northern Virginia" and said he "would make the best governor in the Warner-Kaine tradition."



The Post concluded: "We also believe that he has the character, experience and savvy to be a successful leader of the entire commonwealth."

Do you get it now?
20 posted on 06/09/2009 10:45:28 AM PDT by WaterBoard (Somewhere a Village is Missing it's Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson